Beyond the United States, the number of Chinese naval vessels has ranked first in the world

[055_destroyer]

Read the thread title...



India is going to have 3 Aircraft carriers, Japan also 3. How is China supposed to stand against USN when it can’t even match its next door rival ?

When did Indian has 3 aircraft carrier in near future? Care to elaborate? You mean on paper can be counted as one also?
Japan carrier is just a floating platform with no arrestor hook to deserve the title as aircraft carrier. It heavily depend on US supplied F-35A which has limited payload compare to Rafale, Mig-29K, F-18 and J-15.

US will not be stupid enough to attack China aircraft carrier when fighting proxy war. They wouldn't want to start WWIII. Has Russian kuznetsov been attacked by US before when participate in Syria war?

 

[RealNapster]

When did Indian has 3 aircraft carrier in near future? Care to elaborate? You mean on paper can be counted as one also?

Sure...
https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&sou...aw3Dm5jgXME-xb3Bdy5hEcbT&ust=1558581608604757

And no i dont mean on paper.

Japan carrier is just a floating platform with no arrestor hook to deserve the title as aircraft carrier. It heavily depend on US supplied F-35A

Japan is going to have 63 F-35A’s and 42 F-35B’s. Don’t be a fool thinking that they will put nothing competent on there carriers. Japan even amended their constitution for these carriers why do you think it will not put B’s on c

which has limited payload compare to Rafale, Mig-29K, F-18 and J-15.

F-35B better/comparable to F-18 in BvR.

US will not be stupid enough to attack China aircraft carrier when fighting proxy war.

Hence the more of carriers... remind me what i said ? I said “China... build more carriers...

They wouldn't want to start WWIII.

Maybe.... maybe not.... they are nit afraid to attack iran. Maybe not even ww3. The thing that matters is that they will always come in group... all the west, europe etc and allies...

Has Russian kuznetsov been attacked by US before when participate in Syria war?

No. Hence more carriers...

 

[Adam WANG SHANGHAI MEGA]

Sure...
https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjIwKuKl67iAhVO1hoKHcdIA4AQzPwBegQIARAC&url=https://www.deccanherald.com/national/navy-looking-inducting-56-706179.html&psig=AOvVaw3Dm5jgXME-xb3Bdy5hEcbT&ust=1558581608604757

And no i dont mean on paper.




Japan is going to have 63 F-35A’s and 42 F-35B’s. Don’t be a fool thinking that they will put nothing competent on there carriers. Japan even amended their constitution for these carriers why do you think it will not put B’s on c



F-35B better/comparable to F-18 in BvR.



Hence the more of carriers... remind me what i said ? I said “China... build more carriers...



Maybe.... maybe not.... they are nit afraid to attack iran. Maybe not even ww3. The thing that matters is that they will always come in group... all the west, europe etc and allies...



No. Hence more carriers...

Do you know. why all Americans are willing to talk about Korea war?!!

And that is one war China fought Without aircraft , canon, tanks as well as battle ships!!!

 

[RealNapster]

Do you know. why all Americans are willing to talk about Korea war?!!

And that is one war China fought Without aircraft , canon, tanks as well as battle ships!!!

Can you fight without carriers ? YES.

Should you fight without carriers when you can get them easily ? Doesn’t seem a good strategy.

 

[Menthol]

How about in term of quality?

 

[oprih]

Good, Chinese navy ships are well ahead of their us counterparts too in terms of quality considering that us ships always malfunction and rams themselves to other commercial shipping vessels.

 

[Han Patriot]

Good, Chinese navy ships are well ahead of their us counterparts too in terms of quality considering that us ships always malfunction and rams themselves to other commercial shipping vessels.

I think they lack discpline.