Informant
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2013
- Messages
- 4,436
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
How about a middle ground ?
Good luck.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How about a middle ground ?
A middle ground isn't so bad , thats what they did in Tunisia i.e the secularists and the islamists reached and understanding and things are much better there when compared to Egypt etc.How about a middle ground ?
Every now and then i do trollNice! @EyanKhan Why are you wasting your precious teenage years on trying to be mature? Be reckless! Troll to your heart's content! You won't get this privilege when you reach my age.
Pluralism is an attitude amongst a culture, it cannot be taught by a state.
Islam doesn't refute evolution, merely Darwinism as has other scientific research.
Tauba Tauba. Evolution is haram in Islam according to many mullahs. :mullah.
bahi you are confusing between
evolution of species
vs.
evolution of knowledge and systems.
please read carefully.
no jumping the gun
So then some of the governing principles should be taken from --------?
Yara sab kuch saath saath chalta hai. though me trying to be reckless these days. hardly post on PDF these days. came back from GB a week ago and will be in Kashmir after a few days.Nice! @EyanKhan Why are you wasting your precious teenage years on trying to be mature? Be reckless! Troll to your heart's content! You won't get this privilege when you reach my age.
shhhh I am trying for people to take me seriously here and then you come in
Don't forget to mention me when you do.I have a full theory on the role of religion in the state but will only state it when i have enough listeners.
Kabhi quran khol kai para hou tou pata chaly naa.It was just a combination of cultural and government practices from 8th century beduin society.
Interestingly some of Greece's greatest minds were against the notion of democracy (thought i'd add this to spice up the argument)For me - Usually 'reason' !
But then what is reasonable & unreasonable or acceptable & unacceptable for me may not be so for you - Hence why man created the notion of 'democracy' - Let the most head's decide !
I foresee this talk of Shariah in the same context as English Civil Law - Both are legal paradigms; if there is nothing wrong with a Turk sitting in the US saying that he thinks that the US should adopt the Swiss Civil Code or the English Civil Law or the Turkish rendition of the Swiss Civil Code or the French Civil Law or the US Law....I don't see whats wrong with someone saying 'I think the following provision of Islamic Jurisprudence is meritorious & I think we ought to include it within our Common Law - Lets put it up for a vote' !
What I would find unreasonable is for the State for saying - No...you can't; even if you're able to convince the voters, their representatives or the courts - You still can't do it !
Thats why I say - Pluralism instead of Secularism !
Theres a whole lot to sharia then just Quranic verses!Kabhi quran khol kai para hou tou pata chaly naa.
Best way to implement Sharia in Pakistan ??? | Page 2
Sharia consists of verses like those.
Kabhi quran khol kai para hou tou pata chaly naa.
Best way to implement Sharia in Pakistan ??? | Page 2
Sharia consists of verses like those.
Theres a whole lot to sharia then just Quranic verses!