What's new

'Beijing-Dhaka ties will be substantially damaged if Bangladesh joins Quad'

As I previously stated, it may have relation to TOT and production line of MANPADS, China will only give it if Bangladesh is under China circle. China tested the water first before agreeing on Bangladesh proposal. It is the price of having significant TOT, something that also happen with all China or USSR ally (in the past)
 
The statement is kinda warning... BD will keep China in consideration next time before committing anything to anyone. There is nothing neutral, now everything has a regional approach. With every action, you choose something.
 
Absolutely nothing will happen.... what leverage does china have? Will it stop selling us $10bn worth of goods per year? No, if they are silly to do it we will switch elsewhere...

Will they stop selling us weapon....no as we will go elsewhere...

Will they stop investing.....possibly but BD FDI is fairly low and chinese cheap loans whilst very usefull is not particularly critical.

China has minimal leverage and all these shouting is demonstrating that strategic weakness.

If china pushes too hard it will simply deliver BD in the arms of the quad. China would have been in a stronger position if it had supported BD regarding Rohingya.... every action has a reaction.... china has lost a lot of goodwill.
 
it has been made explicitly clear that BD does not want to get involved in China-Us struggle. It cetrainly does not want to join QUAD


BD not interested in US defence deal under Indo-Pacific strategy
Mir Mostafizur Rahaman | October 13, 2020 00:00:00
Under the proposed Indo Pacific Strategy alliance, led by the United States, Bangladesh is not interested in purchasing arms, rather the country wants American investments in infrastructure.
"They want to sell arms, but we are not interested in issues related to conflict," foreign minister Dr AK Abdul Momen told the FE when asked about Bangladesh's stance on the IPS.
This message will be conveyed to the US deputy secretary of state Stephen Biegan as he kicks off his three-day Dhaka visit tomorrow (Wednesday).
Bangladesh feels that the IPS will be effective for the country if it gets US investments in infrastructure building under the strategy.
01_1081.jpg

"We have no objection to the Indo Pacific strategy. But they should come forward to the infrastructure development if they want to make the IPS more effective".
"They have to spend money, only talking will not do, they have to invest," the minister said pointing out that the US has no contribution to Bangladesh's infrastructure development.
"They can do it if they want," he said defending his argument.
A recent move by the US to sell sophisticated defence equipment, including Apache helicopters, could not be materialised. US officials admitted that they had several rounds of talks with the authorities concerned on selling of sophisticated US defence equipment, which they claimed 'best in the world'.
According to a recent study by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, China is the fifth-biggest arms supplier in the world and also supplies most weapons to the region, except India, which is its regional rival
Around 35 per cent of China's arms supplies went to Pakistan between 2013 and 2017, followed by 19 per cent to Bangladesh.
Dhaka procured 71 per cent of its arms from China over the five-year period, and Myanmar 68 per cent.
In view of the growing influence of China in the region, the US and its allies launched the IPS, apparently to counter China's Belt and Rod Initiative (BRI).
Bangladesh has already become a major partner of BRI under which it will get over 25 billion US dollar for building infrastructure.
Recently, the USA has unleashed a fresh diplomatic offensive to revamp its ties with the regional countries, which have become partners of the China-led BRI.
Meanwhile, the visit of the US Deputy Secretary of State is considered part of that effort, analysts said.
Asked about the possible agenda, the minister admitted that IPS will be a major focus in the talks between Bangladeshi officials and Mr Biegun.
However, issues related to Rohingya, visa and Covid cooperation will also come up, he added.
"We'll discuss the Rohingya issue and we will make it clear that we are not interested in only humanitarian assistance, our main goal is repatriation, they must go back to that country," the minister said.
Dr Momen criticised the USA for not issuing visas to some Bangladeshi students, who secured I-20 from American institutions.
"They have not issued visas to Bangladeshi students who got I-20, but students of the neighbouring countries like India and Pakistan got the same category visas. This is discriminatory," he noted.
This is very discriminatory because Bangladesh's condition is better than other nations in terms of Covid control, impact is much lesser in the country, he argued.
"Still, they did not issue visas to our students, this is not good," he said.
"We also want support for our garment sector, which was affected by Covid," the minister said.
For example, the U.S. can offer the garments sector three years' moratorium on duty to enable the country to absorb the shock from Covid, he added.
 
Absolutely nothing will happen.... what leverage does china have? Will it stop selling us $10bn worth of goods per year? No, if they are silly to do it we will switch elsewhere...

Will they stop selling us weapon....no as we will go elsewhere...

Will they stop investing.....possibly but BD FDI is fairly low and chinese cheap loans whilst very usefull is not particularly critical.

China has minimal leverage and all these shouting is demonstrating that strategic weakness.

If china pushes too hard it will simply deliver BD in the arms of the quad. China would have been in a stronger position if it had supported BD regarding Rohingya.... every action has a reaction.... china has lost a lot of goodwill.



This is a masterstroke by the BD government actually, they needed to ask China to step up their game without saying it outright..

The Chinese ambassador provided the GoB with a very convenient opening and now Momen delivered the message..


The Chinese now know that while BD values the relationship between the two nations alot, BD has never written out the alternatives..


In other words, China needs to do more to ensure BD doesn't slip away to the other side...




This is all a careful game of diplomacy, bluffing and calculated statements, part and parcel of international geopolitics,...


Quite so refreshing to see such a mature approach from the GoB instead of rolling over like some others.
 
Look on previous statement, it is clear China wants BD to be inside his camp and should see Quad camp as its joined enemy

The question is why China needs to do this kind of requirement to BD ? What prompted them to do that ?

BD is not located in SCS and Asia Pasicif region and doesnt have strong naval power that can help either Quad or China if conflict arise.

Its geographical location can be replaced by China with Myanmar and by USA with Andamands islands or India and even Malaysia since Malaysia has been agree to give the access to US armed force interm of permanent refueling site for US navy
 
Last edited:
China should learn from Pak, and never trust on these bangalis snakes, they will eat on your resources but will keep serving their god fathers hindutva terrorist BjP

I think this is uncalled for. Reality now is that BD is an independent country and has its own interests. Logically, East and West Pakistan were just too far away geographically and culturally to be a single country.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom