I agree, my English is better than yours. You shouldn't even try this: doth thy mother know thou weareth her drapes? Whatever the words mean.
No, I am not trying to change you, strangely enough. I am addressing the middle ground, the lurkers, the fence sitters, those who tend to get intimidated by your bullying tactics and your personal attacks into thinking twice about their fundamental and fundamentally correct values, or into keeping a discouraged silence. I have given up thinking that you will change. Religious bigotry has to do with religion, and that has to do with faith, not with reason. There is no possibility that you can be reasoned out of your positions.
Do you even begin to understand?
Again, a fundamental error. I have labelled positions. Do you even know what distinction I am making? Do you care?
Oh no, that red herring will not work very well. I am not taking it personally, I am undermining your argument in its fundamentals by asking you to point to my lies, my bigotry and racism, while I have pointed out every one of yours. So pretending that you are half-humorously, half-indulgently going off the issues I raised to let me down easily is a transparent dodge: you can't point to anything, so you say you don't want to point to anything and make it even more personal for me.
It's not the forum. The forum is fine. It's the creeps who infest it. I couldn't possibly be referring to you, of course; far be it from me to insult you.
As for it not being worth your effort, of course it isn't! You wouldn't get anywhere, forget about how much effort you put in. And I have already told the lot of you: it isn't about getting to get you to respond better to me by not throwing words around loosely; I am not in a popularity contest, never was.
Up to you.
Don't. I didn't ask for that.
LOL. And you think that is Abracadabra?
Yes, it is. And I am coming to it from exactly the other end. Go look for yourself who hate journalists. You could start with ISIS and the CCP. You are in excellent company.
