What's new

Barak-8 is India's answer to Pakistan's Harpoon Anti-Ship Missile

081346orzsex1o9c9cdc1d.jpg.thumb.jpg


Your missile is as misleading as its model. Come on, missile is so smaller that two or three can fit into JF17, now how do you fit in an engine that can take it 5 times speed of sound in that small package with fuel to take it to mentioned range. Either rest of the part is invisible or you guys are blufifng big time. Can you post info/specificatons, about the same missile which is in service with PLAAF..??
I doubt Big time about he power plant part.. And by the way, pls don't type that hypersonic crap again..
No point arguing, patriotism triumph common sense and physical limitations .
chinese propaganda won, pakistan got a false self assurance and we don't care, so everyone is happy.
 
Last edited:
.
It means that it can fly to the target from land or through sea -- from land means the terrain matching and from sea means the sensors like magnetic map to guide the missile to the target, but that target is a fixed target whose image and the map is embebebded prior to the lauch. Not the movable target, which will be 50NM away when it reached the target, and which required constant Monitoring (Satellite), High speed data Link to real time update, Mission computer to change the flight profile and path and intelligent computing.

Nope it does not, because ISPR don't release press release like that, if they are saying targets at land and sea then it means hitting targets at land and sea and in Indo-Pak scenario there are no stationery targets at sea for PAF all are moving capability targets.
 
.
there is only one way to find out if you are correct :devil:

USA itself is moving on to LRASM AND HARPOON new generation.USN never felt the need to have anti ship missiles to the degree the soviets did.Because USN doctrine centres around its carriers,and their aircraft..while soviets were forced to try and counter them with anti ship missiles.If US wanted sure they could ,but they feel no need to.

U dont park your flag ship in enemy waters with its radar off....

U do make excuses when your advertised super defence system fails to pick up a promitive missile

Blame the israeli navy for being sloppy..blaming the missile is just lol.

Omg ....indians on pdf found out things about cm 400 akg that no one in world has so far....only by closing eyes .....

Whoa thats great....

I think the whole displaying in airshows and even offering it for export in REAL WORLD is just a build up to bollywood movie

CM400 itself is largely a show weapon,china itself doesn't bother to use it..prefering actual sea skimmers.The exocets launched by agostas are far more dangerous to IN.
 
.
CM400 itself is largely a show weapon,china itself doesn't bother to use it..prefering actual sea skimmers.The exocets launched by agostas are far more dangerous to IN.

Is that why russia doesnt bother to induct joint dev barahmos aka p800...
 
. .
USA itself is moving on to LRASM AND HARPOON new generation.USN never felt the need to have anti ship missiles to the degree the soviets did.Because USN doctrine centres around its carriers,and their aircraft..while soviets were forced to try and counter them with anti ship missiles.If US wanted sure they could ,but they feel no need to.



Blame the israeli navy for being sloppy..blaming the missile is just lol.



CM400 itself is largely a show weapon,china itself doesn't bother to use it..prefering actual sea skimmers.The exocets launched by agostas are far more dangerous to IN.


Show weapon?? What the £uck is that???

So u think chinese are repeatedly offering potential buyers show weapons in international arms shows?? Be serious....

By the way israeli military is one of the best trained and disciplined in the world...they are not slopy....
That radar on that ship was on that day......
 
. .
Hey,

Let us look at a scenario

1. Gaofeng spots a target. For simplicity sake, assume it is a land based SAM, which has been deployed in a stationary position. The Gaofeng now spots this.

We both are on the same page here. Where we differ on is what happens next. You say, the Beido system tracks the target. I am saying, you are mixing two things here. One is the Beidou constellation of satellites and the second is the GIS system with the spatial data. The satellites of GPS systems only transmit a time stamp. The satellites cannot track the 'target' or a device which receives the data.
Hi

first of i am talking about sea based targets, not land based. this thread is about the barak 8 and the harpoon. but i shall answer it when relevant.a gps is moe than one satalite, as an actuall a single satalite is not even a gps satelite you need atleast 3. this is to trianglate the target which pin points your exact location. also can yuo prove the gaofeng only gives out a time stamp only and notreal time guidance.

Next let us say, what you says is correct.
1. The Gaefong knows where it is. Agreed on this. The Gaofeng knows where the target is. For this you will need the following:
a. What is the target. This would mean either a manual operator marking the target. Let us assume the manual operator marks the target. Once, the operator marks the target the satellite does not need to have the image maps. They are stored in a GIS database locally where the operator sits. So the situation you mentioned of images loaded on the satellite does not arise.
this is very linear and irrelevant. firstly i did mention a library of targets and also the satelite will only ensure its not going to identify a civilian target i.e. a cargoship. also one of its own ships. its worth pointing out that civilain ships have route plans, just like flight plans for aircraft. but for ships. it would just ensure that it ignors civilian ships and ensure they are civilian and not mascurading as civilian ships. and then know where its own ships are. it does sound quiet complicated, im not to good with words. but in the end, it is visully confirmed before action is taken


b. You mention the Gaofeng searching for something from a library of images. Possible. But, then the military does not automate target selection. But, here is a problem. The Gaofeng can be used only on water. Not on land. Due to multiple other variation possibilities. But let us go ahead and say the Gaofeng identifies a target. This is handed over to an officer for confirmation. He confirms the target.

Now, where we differ is what happens next.
the gaofang can be used for land targets. infact thats what its specifically made for. they are other more advanced satelites but this one is the most publically known so i though i may as well referance this instead of more sensative systems.
below is a image taken be gaofang-1
hqdefault.jpg


how do you know the chinese millitary does not automatically identify specific targets?
as you said moving on......

The Baidu keeps track. The question is how? The satellite only transmits timestamps. How will it keep track? Does the Baidu satellite have a receiver for receiving signals from a device? Does it have an imaging camera to keep track? How does it 'track' the target?
baidu is a gps satelite. now how does a gps satalite track where you are.lets say your in mumbia and you want to go to dehli and your gps is giving you directions. how does it know where you are. easy the reciever or the thing thats giving your directions. now that is not going to work, as the adversary is not going to have a gps reciever for you to use to sink them! duh i guess. so how does the satalite actually locate where you are. now that comes from the gaofang-1. that finds the target and gives its location to baidu and thenis process and it threat level is assessed and it confirmed via c&c and via library image and then its tracked by image and its current loaction. word out is that there is a satelite thats can do both identyfy and track already up!!! so that removes any comunication compleatly and removes your concerns.



I hope you understand the query we are having now. How does a satellite which only sends out a particular data, track a stationary or mobile device? It is logical for the Gaofeng to track the target and update real-time. Not Baidu.
well to aviod being abrupt i will say i will agree to disagree and move on.

regards

Barak-1 has very small range -less than 15 km..so detecting at lower ranges is not an issue because the missile can't attack beyond a certain range.Barak and harpoon are same generation weapons.PN has had harpoon for yaesr and IN has counted on barak to intercept it.The new generation Barak 8 is a step above this old 80s era missile which USN is now seeking to replace.
i am aware of the barak1 short range but dont you think it range is a weakness in its self. it means the threat is closers and the responce windown is exreamly small. the barak 8 does solve this by being long range but my first post already covers that.
 
. .
So the Brahmos also obsolete ?
Don't talk like an imbecile for the love of God in an international forum.Brahmos has got the unique distinction of being the only cruise missile in the world which flies it's entire path in supersonic speed of Mach 2.8-3.0.Yup there are many theatre/tactical ballistic missiles in the world that have a speed in excess of 5 Mach but they are all ballistic missiles,that means they will always follow an exoatmospheric trajectory which can be easily countered by any anti-ballistic missile.Otoh,a sea skimming cruise missile that too flying towards the target at supersonic speed throughout it's path is extremely difficult to intercept due to the lack of reaction time:coffee:!!
 
.
Russia uses the Oniks which is same specifications.Inducting a weapon assembled in india would make no sense for russia which could do it at home.The p800 is also much costlier than the klub,and also heavier.
If oniks is so super duper then why Russia doesnt use it in mass scale to score 100% hit! the only countries who use this missile is vietnam syria and indonesia. lol
 
.
If oniks is so super duper then why Russia doesnt use it in mass scale to score 100% hit! the only countries who use this missile is vietnam syria and indonesia. lol

1.Cost of oniks.Russian navy was cash strapped in case u didn't notice.Klub is a whole versatile family,which performs multiple tasks moreover.
2.Weight of oniks which hinders use in ships less than large frigate size.Russia has not inducted very many ships of such size after breakup of soviet union.The odler ships were fitted with soviet era missiles and deemed too costly to upgrade.
Russia does use Oniks as coastal defence anti ship batteries.

IN evaluated both missiles and replaced the klubs on its talwars with the more costlier brahmos.If brahmos was inferior it would make no sense to induct a heavier and far more costly missile over a cheaper one.
 
.
Indians here think Ra' ad can not hit Ships while ISPR saying it can hit targets at Land and Sea, at sea there are no stationery targets for PAF when it comes to India vs Pakistan.



Indian only think they can strike or defend while Pakistanis are sleeping and sitting ducks. LOL

RA'AD is a badass .. Try intercepting a missile that skimms barely a few meters from surface... And can change target during flight ...


Terrain hugging muthafucka!
 
.
RA'AD is a badass .. Try intercepting a missile that skimms barely a few meters from surface... And can change target during flight ...


Terrain hugging muthafucka!
Any update on Babur naval version? It's been awhile.
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom