What's new

Bangladesh targets 7.8% economic growth in new fiscal year

Status
Not open for further replies.
Your habitable areas are not much bigger than Bangladesh.Deduct all those deserts, rugged mountains which has little or no value for settlement or economic activities, Pakistan will come to the Bangladesh size. Why do you think your 55 percent population is concentrated in Punjab which has less than 1/4th of Pakistan's surface area?

Lol, my home province Sindh have same area as Bangladesh. Forget about Punjab which is a much bigger province. You are proving yourself to be a laughing stock here, as the time passes.

Southern parts of Balochistan(which people consider as inhabitable) are something like this, still easily habitable, while northern part have many cities and towns.
13_makran_2.jpg

2496012868_be6d3b48e0_b.jpg
 
Last edited:
. .
Are you actually telling me Dhaka is cleaner than Lahore? Not only are they more dirty they have bad sanitation systems and pot holed roads which make it a nightmare for anybody that live there.
I am not claiming Dhaka is cleaner than Lahore, but do not think it's cleanliness is anyway worse. That's why I am asking how you came into conclusion that Dhaka is dirtier than Lahore?
Not only are they more dirty they have bad sanitation systems and pot holed roads which make it a nightmare for anybody that live there.
Again unsubstantiated claim, Dhaka's sanitation and cleanliness is no doubt less than a developed country's capital, but how you have decided that it is even worse than Lahore? Do you have any Data?
and pot holed roads which make it a nightmare for anybody that live there.
Dhaka has both good road and pot holed road. Are you saying that, Lahore has no pot-holed road?
 
.
I am not claiming Dhaka has cleaner road than Lahore, but do not think it's cleanliness is anyway worse. That's why I am asking how you came into conclusion that Dhaka is dirtier than Lahore?


Lahore actually is very clean and S.Sharif the CM can take the credit for it, it has a proper garbage collection system, a proper garbage disposal system, roads are washed and cleared with machine cleaners and that is about 70% of Lahore, the old high density area, low income area is not that clean and well planned, though the Lahore Metro train is constructed in that low income area.
 
. .
@Homo Sapiens

The reason Lahore is getting cleaner by the day...



Lahore Waste Management Company

http://www.lwmc.com.pk/index.php

670074-lahore-1392090944-333-640x480.jpg


l_97402_103633_print.jpg


truck.jpg


178.jpg


Lahore%20-%20Sukh%20Chain%20Garden%20-%20008.jpg


PITB-LWMC.jpg


IMG_7071.JPG


hqdefault.jpg



FotorCreated-41.jpg




ozpak-main-workshop.jpg


albyairaknecefhaber2.jpg



https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/laho...nd-greener-too-new-imagery-here.515947/page-9

Southern parts of Balochistan(which people consider as inhabitable) are something like this, still easily habitable, while northern part have many cities and towns.


Also Balochistan produces a huge quantity of fruits and dry fruits, the best apples, apricots, peaches, grapes, pomegranates, cherries, plums, dry fruits includes a big variety of them.

Ziarat Balochistan
up-HI4MFEKLJHFMBSBB.jpg


Chaman near Quetta produces the best apples.
191b80a77d8fafb5751eddee914218a7.jpg


Lol, my home province Sindh have same area as Bangladesh. Forget about Punjab which is a much bigger province. You are proving yourself to be a laughing stock here, as the time passes.


Balochistan now has a population of 14 million, so no question of it not habitable. In fact the rate of growth in population is highest in this province.

Capture-3-1-472x480.jpg
 
.
Your habitable areas are not much bigger than Bangladesh.Deduct all those deserts, rugged mountains which has little or no value for settlement or economic activities, Pakistan will come to the Bangladesh size. Why do you think your 55 percent population is concentrated in Punjab which has less than 1/4th of Pakistan's surface area?

Even taking out half of Pakistan, they are still nearly 3 times less dense than BD in population density.
I would say around 50% of the remaining 50% of land can support at least some populations.
Pakistanis have the space to live in large houses, whereas most of BD urban population will need to be housed in apartments.
 
.
Lahore actually is very clean and S.Sharif the CM can take the credit for it, it has a proper garbage collection system, a proper garbage disposal system, roads are washed and cleared with machine cleaners and that is about 70% of Lahore, the old high density area, low income area is not that clean and well planned, though the Lahore Metro train is constructed in that low income area.
If clean, low density area is 70% of Lahore and old, high density unclean areas are 30% of Lahore, that means most of the population are living in unclean areas.So Lahore is basically an unclean city, there is no scope to claim it is more clean than Dhaka. Dhaka also has areas which are very clean and also has areas which are not so clean.For the few years, Dhaka's cleanliness improved a lot, roadside open dustbin are almost gone, garbage are now collected door-to-door, trashcan can be found in many roadside, still it is fundamentally a unclean city.Same with Lahore.There is no scope claiming this city is cleaner than that city.

I understand that Lahore is much developed than rest of Pakistan. But at what cost? I thank God that, there is no one in Bangladesh who think, 58 percent of development budget should go to Dhaka, let alone implementing that outrageous thing. Currently there are 10 fast track mega project in Bangladesh under implementation, among them only 1 in Dhaka city.

Lahore gets 58pc share in development budget
https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/140021-Lahore-gets-58pc-share-in-development-budget

Lahore gets lion’s share of Punjab development budget
https://dailytimes.com.pk/65767/lahore-gets-lions-share-of-punjab-development-budget/


@Species @Ashik Mahmud @TopCat @Black_cats @UKBengali
 
Last edited:
.
Even taking out half of Pakistan, they are still nearly 3 times less dense than BD in population density.
I would say around 50% of the remaining 50% of land can support at least some populations.
Pakistanis have the space to live in large houses, whereas most of BD urban population will need to be housed in apartments.


You are right about the population density it is about 5.5 times higher in Bangladesh compared to Pakistan. Also Balochistan all look rugged and inhabitable has about 14 million population. Gilgit Baltistan region about half the size of B'desh has about 4-4.5 million people.

Yes Balochistan has the lowest density as it is 42% of Pakistan in area and population of 14 million. Rich in minerals and metals gas, oil and ironically grows the largest amount of fruits and dry fruits in Pakistan, some varieties.

I understand that Lahore is much developed than rest of Pakistan. But at what cost? I thank God that, there is no one in Bangladesh who think, 58 percent of development budget should go to Dhaka, let alone implementing that outrageous thing. Currently there are 10 fast track mega project in Bangladesh under implementation, only 2 are in Dhaka city.

58% of Punjab budget, not Pakistan's and that is an anomaly raised by the opposition PTI. Lahore overall gives a very neat and clean look, roads are in fact better than many in Islamabad. Good public transport buses, diff. types, BRTS, now Metro train.

The area spread is as big as Karachi and with a population half of it, at 11 million for Lahore. There is no concept of apartment living in Lahore as it has in Karachi, people just hate apartments in Lahore. Big, not that big bungalows are preferred, the income disparity is acute than in Karachi.

Karachi is the financial, commercial, industrial hub just as Dacca hence lots of inland migration to city. Lahore doesn't faces this problem in that scale.

If clean, low density area is 70% of Lahore and old, high density unclean areas are 30% of Lahore, that means most of the population are living in unclean areas.So Lahore is basically an unclean city, there is no scope to claim it is more clean than Dhaka. Dhaka also has areas which are very clean and also has areas which are not so clean.For the few years, Dhaka's cleanliness improved a lot, roadside open dustbin are almost gone, garbage are now collected door-to-door, trashcan can be found in many roadside, still it is fundamentally a unclean city.Same with Lahore.There is no scope claiming this city is cleaner than that city.



Lahore city overall gives a clean and green, neat and clean impression, and this in fact is true, the old walled city area is all renovated and developed now. A mix of colonial, Moghul and modern and traditional architecture.

087d48e955feb29172df48897915b76c.jpg


1a60026d5572085a008f0d6b85d1e637.jpg


6a4ec99d31c6ceada115bfc93cef251a.jpg


284e608358ebb5a89873a593398144c2.jpg


3f89b71b596e7b5aaab7e845b31c7535.jpg


f69076eb4a7eec29a254be2cbe2a8e70.jpg


mall.png


51103576.jpg


main-qimg-a0ac360741c571ba9388b1d2c9e6b70b


5.-Lahore-Ring-Road-Package-7.jpg


f9529d337267c8ffac2bed98a89f0acb--pakistan-travel-lahore-pakistan.jpg


124.jpg


45665769.jpg


53272216641b31ee04254b9214de84d5--aircraft-carrier-lahore-pakistan.jpg
 
.
Your roads are laughable. We already have 1100 KM of 6 lane expressways. Including one which is 4500 feet above sea level. There is no count of how much 4 lane we have though.
Very good. You should look to manufacture some condoms in Pakistan if you have enough expertise to do that.

Photos of your hotels in a thread about Bangladesh's growth rate.....then stating you have this and that again and again......really, how desperate you guys can get?

You are right about the population density it is about 5.5 times higher in Bangladesh compared to Pakistan. Also Balochistan all look rugged and inhabitable has about 14 million population. Gilgit Baltistan region about half the size of B'desh has about 4-4.5 million people.

Yes Balochistan has the lowest density as it is 42% of Pakistan in area and population of 14 million. Rich in minerals and metals gas, oil and ironically grows the largest amount of fruits and dry fruits in Pakistan, some varieties.



58% of Punjab budget, not Pakistan's and that is an anomaly raised by the opposition PTI. Lahore overall gives a very neat and clean look, roads are in fact better than many in Islamabad. Good public transport buses, diff. types, BRTS, now Metro train.

The area spread is as big as Karachi and with a population half of it, at 11 million for Lahore. There is no concept of apartment living in Lahore as it has in Karachi, people just hate apartments in Lahore. Big, not that big bungalows are preferred, the income disparity is acute than in Karachi.

Karachi is the financial, commercial, industrial hub just as Dacca hence lots of inland migration to city. Lahore doesn't faces this problem in that scale.





Lahore city overall gives a clean and green, neat and clean impression, and this in fact is true, the old walled city area is all renovated and developed now. A mix of colonial, Moghul and modern and traditional architecture.

087d48e955feb29172df48897915b76c.jpg


1a60026d5572085a008f0d6b85d1e637.jpg


6a4ec99d31c6ceada115bfc93cef251a.jpg


284e608358ebb5a89873a593398144c2.jpg


3f89b71b596e7b5aaab7e845b31c7535.jpg


f69076eb4a7eec29a254be2cbe2a8e70.jpg


mall.png


51103576.jpg


main-qimg-a0ac360741c571ba9388b1d2c9e6b70b


5.-Lahore-Ring-Road-Package-7.jpg


f9529d337267c8ffac2bed98a89f0acb--pakistan-travel-lahore-pakistan.jpg


124.jpg


45665769.jpg


53272216641b31ee04254b9214de84d5--aircraft-carrier-lahore-pakistan.jpg
One thing is sure, Lahore has beautiful roads.
 
.
A staff with 3 negative ratings!? Also zero positive ones so net negative 3! I am at a worry on what you are going to do after reading through this thread.
Exceptions are always there. Well i will watch future ambitious Bangladeshies opinions while having sip of coffee. Its fun you shiush try it too.

Soon it will be SP Ban 2020.
 
.
Yep, we are weak. But if you consider the history of Pakistan, as long as we 'weak people' were part of Pakistan, Pakistan never faced a defeat in any war but as soon as we 'weak people' left Pakistan, you have to face the most humiliating surrender in post-WWII era and allowed India to extend its hegemony in the region. Seems quite legit!

The only defeat Pakistan faced was 71, when 34,000 Pakistani troops surrendered. Although it was a humiliating defeat but we should be sane enough to accept the factors that contributed in that defeat. Some to mention includes,

  • Home ground was 1500 km away.
  • No direct or connected supply route from home ground.
  • The turf was surrounded by enemy home ground from 3 sides and the sea had entire coast line spread for thousands of miles of enemy, not to forget the air route was surrounded by enemy too and it was ban for any Pakistani military or civilians flights.
  • The turf was crawling with hostile terrorists who were trained and pushed in by indians, the size of these terrorists alone was 15 times bigger than that of Pakistani soldiers.
  • The population was brainwashed and rebellious.

Years after that Pakistan had a skirmishes with Soviets and Israel and Pakistan was successful. Then again Pakistan had skirmish with India and Pakistan liberated commendable chunk of occupied Kashmir which was later lost due to political pressure, still a strategic peak was kept under control even today and it oversee entire posts of indian forces and serves as excellent vantage point for the road where the supplies goes to Siachen. From 2001 until 2018 there are several standoffs and skirmishes where Pakistan's result is way better.
 
.
Lahore overall gives a very neat and clean look, roads are in fact better than many in Islamabad. Good public transport buses, diff. types, BRTS, now Metro train.

The area spread is as big as Karachi and with a population half of it, at 11 million for Lahore. There is no concept of apartment living in Lahore as it has in Karachi, people just hate apartments in Lahore. Big, not that big bungalows are preferred, the income disparity is acute than in Karachi.

Karachi is the financial, commercial, industrial hub just as Dacca hence lots of inland migration to city. Lahore doesn't faces this problem in that scale.
Very good for Lahore. I actually like Lahore and wish it the best. I acknowledge, life is more comfortable in Lahore than Dhaka right now. I regret that this thread turned into everything BD vs PAK our of no reason. I wish both Bangladesh and Pakistan to develop in a same speed, actually all of South Asia. Even if we compare ourselves, it should be in a friendly manner. I have seen plenty of American, British, french, German are constantly comparing the merit and demerit of living in each of their country, but never in such a foul ways.Can not we become just like them? It is true that one of our poster made a mistake saying that Bangladesh will become 2nd largest economy of South Asia next year, I believe he did not anticipated such an outcome, but trouble started when a notorious Tamil troll catched that opportunity to turn this thread into a ugly mud sliding race between Bangladeshi and Pakistani posters. Some Pakistani poster like @Khan_21 helped him to grow this cancerous thread. Rest of us are now just increasing it's size.:undecided:
 
Last edited:
.
If clean, low density area is 70% of Lahore and old, high density unclean areas are 30% of Lahore, that means most of the population are living in unclean areas.So Lahore is basically an unclean city, there is no scope to claim it is more clean than Dhaka. Dhaka also has areas which are very clean and also has areas which are not so clean.For the few years, Dhaka's cleanliness improved a lot, roadside open dustbin are almost gone, garbage are now collected door-to-door, trashcan can be found in many roadside, still it is fundamentally a unclean city.Same with Lahore.There is no scope claiming this city is cleaner than that city.

I understand that Lahore is much developed than rest of Pakistan. But at what cost? I thank God that, there is no one in Bangladesh who think, 58 percent of development budget should go to Dhaka, let alone implementing that outrageous thing. Currently there are 10 fast track mega project in Bangladesh under implementation, among them only 1 in Dhaka city.

Lahore gets 58pc share in development budget
https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/140021-Lahore-gets-58pc-share-in-development-budget

Lahore gets lion’s share of Punjab development budget
https://dailytimes.com.pk/65767/lahore-gets-lions-share-of-punjab-development-budget/


@Species @Ashik Mahmud @TopCat @Black_cats @UKBengali
Punjabistan
You are right about the population density it is about 5.5 times higher in Bangladesh compared to Pakistan. Also Balochistan all look rugged and inhabitable has about 14 million population. Gilgit Baltistan region about half the size of B'desh has about 4-4.5 million people.

Yes Balochistan has the lowest density as it is 42% of Pakistan in area and population of 14 million. Rich in minerals and metals gas, oil and ironically grows the largest amount of fruits and dry fruits in Pakistan, some varieties.



58% of Punjab budget, not Pakistan's and that is an anomaly raised by the opposition PTI. Lahore overall gives a very neat and clean look, roads are in fact better than many in Islamabad. Good public transport buses, diff. types, BRTS, now Metro train.

The area spread is as big as Karachi and with a population half of it, at 11 million for Lahore. There is no concept of apartment living in Lahore as it has in Karachi, people just hate apartments in Lahore. Big, not that big bungalows are preferred, the income disparity is acute than in Karachi.

Karachi is the financial, commercial, industrial hub just as Dacca hence lots of inland migration to city. Lahore doesn't faces this problem in that scale.





Lahore city overall gives a clean and green, neat and clean impression, and this in fact is true, the old walled city area is all renovated and developed now. A mix of colonial, Moghul and modern and traditional architecture.

087d48e955feb29172df48897915b76c.jpg


1a60026d5572085a008f0d6b85d1e637.jpg


6a4ec99d31c6ceada115bfc93cef251a.jpg


284e608358ebb5a89873a593398144c2.jpg


3f89b71b596e7b5aaab7e845b31c7535.jpg


f69076eb4a7eec29a254be2cbe2a8e70.jpg


mall.png


51103576.jpg


main-qimg-a0ac360741c571ba9388b1d2c9e6b70b


5.-Lahore-Ring-Road-Package-7.jpg


f9529d337267c8ffac2bed98a89f0acb--pakistan-travel-lahore-pakistan.jpg


124.jpg


45665769.jpg


53272216641b31ee04254b9214de84d5--aircraft-carrier-lahore-pakistan.jpg
I have a question which is unrelated to the thread and discussion.....altho at this point nothing seems off topic in d!ck measuring threads.

Why capital was moved from Karachi to Islamabad? Karachi is obviously more important. And better suited to be the capital, no?

The only defeat Pakistan faced was 71, when 34,000 Pakistani troops surrendered. Although it was a humiliating defeat but we should be sane enough to accept the factors that contributed in that defeat. Some to mention includes,

  • Home ground was 1500 km away.
  • No direct or connected supply route from home ground.
  • The turf was surrounded by enemy home ground from 3 sides and the sea had entire coast line spread for thousands of miles of enemy, not to forget the air route was surrounded by enemy too and it was ban for any Pakistani military or civilians flights.
  • The turf was crawling with hostile terrorists who were trained and pushed in by indians, the size of these terrorists alone was 15 times bigger than that of Pakistani soldiers.
  • The population was brainwashed and rebellious.

Years after that Pakistan had a skirmishes with Soviets and Israel and Pakistan was successful. Then again Pakistan had skirmish with India and Pakistan liberated commendable chunk of occupied Kashmir which was later lost due to political pressure, still a strategic peak was kept under control even today and it oversee entire posts of indian forces and serves as excellent vantage point for the road where the supplies goes to Siachen. From 2001 until 2018 there are several standoffs and skirmishes where Pakistan's result is way better.
Say whatever you want, my boy.
Fact remains. No other country lost as much land as Pakistan in last 50 years. No country made this large unconditional surrender since WW2 either. But anyway....master race remains master race. Glory to Punjabistan.
 
.
Punjabistan

Did you even read the article or prematurely f@rt3d?

Lahore gets lion share of Punjab's development budget not Pakistan's.

I have a question which is unrelated to the thread and discussion.....altho at this point nothing seems off topic in d!ck measuring threads.

Why capital was moved from Karachi to Islamabad? Karachi is obviously more important. And better suited to be the capital, no?

Because Karachi is located close to sea and Pakistan naval forces are not as strong as air force and army. Islamabad was close to GHQ in Rawalpindi, several airbase in KPK and Punjab, IOK was closer too. One can easily keep an eye on developments happening in the region from Islamabad than from Karachi.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom