Bangladesh is also worried about Indian Muslims: Pakistani President Alvi

[pakpride00090]

From my experience, atleast a half or 40% Bangladeshis have a good impression of Pakistanis and don't ascribe to Hasina's brainwashing. The Sylhetis are almost totally pro-Pakistani, and they share blood with Pukhtoons and Punjabis whom they intermarried with or descended from.

And yet 1971 happened and they said bye bye forever .....

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

And yet 1971 happened and they said bye bye forever .....

Situation evolved rapidly into something very few people foresaw. Few individuals and groups controlled the narrative, and India w/ Hindu Bangalis did great PR for those people.

In the same way, I can tell you about Partition, no one wanted massacres and bloodshed in Punjab, except a few Indian and Sikh leaders who wanted to change the demographics to steal land. It was difficult to predict, and million Muslims atleast were killed due to the rapid pace and methodical organization of massacres.

Its time we move on from then.

 

[pakpride00090]

Situation evolved rapidly into something very few people foresaw. Few individuals and groups controlled the narrative, and India w/ Hindu Bangalis did great PR for those people.

In the same way, I can tell you about Partition, no one wanted massacres and bloodshed in Punjab, except a few Indian and Sikh leaders who wanted to change the demographics to steal land. It was difficult to predict, and million Muslims atleast were killed due to the rapid pace and methodical organization of massacres.

Its time we move on from then.

What are you talking about mate ... An over-whelming majority of Awami league was bengali muslims. Mukhti bahini was primarily composed of bengali muslims. A good number of defections happened from Pakistan armed forces by bengali muslims.

You can't compare this to Partition. Bloodshed during partition happened due to haste. British tried to do it quickly which resulted in panic and poorly executed decisions. Also , animosity b/w hindus/sikhs and muslims played a key role too.

Sheikh mujeeb and his cronies were on the separatist path since late 1950s and/or early 1960s. His party won the majority in Bengal with his separatist agenda. You are just trying to white-wash bengali crime.

 

[Black_cats]

What are you talking about mate ... An over-whelming majority of Awami league was bengali muslims. Mukhti bahini was primarily composed of bengali muslims. A good number of defections happened from Pakistan armed forces by bengali muslims.

You can't compare this to Partition. Bloodshed during partition happened due to haste. British tried to do it quickly which resulted in panic and poorly executed decisions. Also , animosity b/w hindus/sikhs and muslims played a key role too.

Sheikh mujeeb and his cronies were on the separatist path since late 1950s and/or early 1960s. His party won the majority in Bengal with his separatist agenda. You are just trying to white-wash bengali crime.

Mukti Bahini was created as a reaction to genocide and rape carried out by occupational Pakistani army and its collaborators. This is not the other way around.

 

[hussain0216]

Mukti Bahini was created as a reaction to genocide and rape carried out by occupational Pakistani army and its collaborators. This is not the other way around.

It's the other way around you were always traitors

 

[UKBengali]

It's the other way around you were always traitors

Technically the majority cannot be traitors, only the minority.

You see in 1971, BD was Pakistan and everyone else was there for the ride.

 

[Black_cats]

It's the other way around you were always traitors

So tell me when Bhutto and Yahiya instructed you kill and rape it’s own citizen just to remain in power or to go to power they were patriotic?

 

[Ritual]

This nonsense divide and rule must end. We are moving towards unity & co-operation once again. 50 years of animosity cannot trump 1000 years of bonds between all Muslims of South Asia or Hindutva extremists will continue to infiltrate into BD and cause strife from within.

 

[SIPRA]

This nonsense divide and rule must end. We are moving towards unity & co-operation once again. 50 years of animosity cannot trump 1000 years of bonds between all Muslims of South Asia or Hindutva extremists will continue to infiltrate into BD and cause strife from within.

Possibly, this conflict, between Pakistan and Bangladesh, would continue. This divide is psychological in nature and is, in fact, a war of opposing narratives. People of both countries tend to stick to their own narratives; and unless this gap is abridged, the conflict would remain, as it is.

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

What are you talking about mate ... An over-whelming majority of Awami league was bengali muslims. Mukhti bahini was primarily composed of bengali muslims. A good number of defections happened from Pakistan armed forces by bengali muslims.

You can't compare this to Partition. Bloodshed during partition happened due to haste. British tried to do it quickly which resulted in panic and poorly executed decisions. Also , animosity b/w hindus/sikhs and muslims played a key role too.

Sheikh mujeeb and his cronies were on the separatist path since late 1950s and/or early 1960s. His party won the majority in Bengal with his separatist agenda. You are just trying to white-wash bengali crime.

The situation can deteriorate rapidly, and in both circumstances we were caught off guard. We never expected Indians to be this cruel and inhuman, but they have showed us again and again that they doing the Devil's work on Earth.

Mukti Bahini was created as a reaction to genocide and rape carried out by occupational Pakistani army and its collaborators. This is not the other way around.

India and Bangali Hindus created the groundwork for Mukhti Bahini. Some of those 'Muslims' fed those lies by Tagore and his type of anti-Muslim, sectarian bigots like Mujeeb saw advantage in dividing a Muslim country. It mattered not that it fell into the hands of Indian Kuffar.

Yet I think that it was good for Pakistan, as it freed us to look after ourselves and build our narrative for our country which gave more importance to our Afghan, Iranic, and Turkic roots. It also made us, more or less, a homogeneous Muslim country with an IVC/Iranic culture.

 

[pakpride00090]

Mukti Bahini was created as a reaction to genocide and rape carried out by occupational Pakistani army and its collaborators. This is not the other way around.

There was no genocide or rape as advertised by Indians and Bengalis.. You just have to repeat the lie again and again to make yourself feel better.

Read the book by sharmila bose.

 

[Black_cats]

There was no genocide or rape as advertised by Indians and Bengalis.. You just have to repeat the lie again and again to make yourself feel better.

Read the book by sharmila bose.

It may be on your dictionary but genocide and rape is well accepted fact worldwide including UN. Educate yourself.

 

[pakpride00090]

It may be on your dictionary but genocide and rape is well accepted fact worldwide including UN. Educate yourself.

You clearly are an idiot ... No one recognizes that except India and Bangladesh.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1167832861644328966

Your whole genocide narrative is based on a lie. Mujib concocted 3 million figure from his jail ... Lol https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/may/24/mujib-confusion-on-bangladeshi-deaths

The situation can deteriorate rapidly, and in both circumstances we were caught off guard. We never expected Indians to be this cruel and inhuman, but they have showed us again and again that they doing the Devil's work on Earth.



India and Bangali Hindus created the groundwork for Mukhti Bahini. Some of those 'Muslims' fed those lies by Tagore and his type of anti-Muslim, sectarian bigots like Mujeeb saw advantage in dividing a Muslim country. It mattered not that it fell into the hands of Indian Kuffar.

Yet I think that it was good for Pakistan, as it freed us to look after ourselves and build our narrative for our country which gave more importance to our Afghan, Iranic, and Turkic roots. It also made us, more or less, a homogeneous Muslim country with an IVC/Iranic culture.

Not some of the muslims brother otherwise we would have clearly won. But you are right , what has happened , has happened. Although we must not forget what happened and who was the main orchestra-tor.

 

[Black_cats]

You clearly are an idiot ... No one recognizes that except India and Bangladesh.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1167832861644328966

Your whole genocide narrative is based on a lie. Mujib concocted 3 million figure from his jail ... Lol https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/may/24/mujib-confusion-on-bangladeshi-deaths



Not some of the muslims brother otherwise we would have clearly won. But you are right , what has happened , has happened. Although we must not forget what happened and who was the main orchestra-tor.

This is your delusion that no genocide happened. Even the article you shared mentioned Bangabandhu mistakenly said .3 million as 3 million. Even if we accept the later figure it is a mass genocide.

In 1970s US sided with Pakistan as it was doing the dirty works for master against the soviets. That’s the reason it’s not officially accepted. But even in USA it is well recognized as a genocide.

Here the whole narratives and chain of events are described what happened during and after the genocide at UN.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_recognition_of_Bangladesh

 

[SIPRA]

You clearly are an idiot ... No one recognizes that except India and Bangladesh.

I fail to understand that why you are entering into a futile discussion with BD posters, on establishment of BD. It has nothing to do with this thread, which pertains to an issue, that is between India and BD, and Pakistan has hardly any relevance in it.