Why do you keep diverting from one topic to another? You have overly simplified a very complex phenomena which you don't understand seem to gasp, or let's just say we have different views on. And if I dispute the Mukti Bahini as a propaganda tool and the war to be exaggerated, you will automatically deny that story. (note: I don't have such a view). The problem with your mind is cannot comprehend the level of complexities on the world and you look for common patterns. You use personal letter as sources and references and blame me for using "unreliable" source such as the Economist.
But for you to discredit Amarta Sen's arguments you will need far more than you have mentioned although you have mentioned none. I never claimed him as a god, but he's no military personal who spends time online spreading delusional ideas and neither is self claimed know it all. Your mind has lost the capability to differentiate between a source and reliable source. Can you dispute Amarta Sens argument other than engaging to rhetoric and sarcasm and back it with concrete facts and figures? I doubt it.
