BANGLADESH AND ASIA’S MARITIME BALANCE

[dray]

If you guys could do anything, you would be able to quell all the insurgency in your country. Instead, it keeps on increasing and spreading throughout your country. You can't solve conflicts within your own country and have wet dreams of invading foreign nations. You people are truly delusional.

As for your question well, you never asked a question but rather had an intention to troll.

But I will give you the role Bangladesh can play:

1. Build a deep sea port.
2. After getting the training subs, order newer diesel subs from China. Probably the export version of either Song Class or Yuan class submarine. The Song Class itself has shown its stealth ability by popping up at a US aircraft training. And they couldn't even detect it but rather saw it after it surfaced. That will give India some headache, thinking of it every time they enter Bay of Bengal.
3. Invite more Chinese warships for joint training into both Bangladesh part of Bay of Bengal and the International waters part.

What insurgencies? Those small issues have been contained. In any case, we do not want to invade BD, so no question of having any dreams about it. There is no gain, no pride in invading a defenceless small country.

And I asked about real role that BD might play in Asia's maritime balance, not BD wet dreams!

 

[Signalian]

They didn't fire because they didn't imagine that they would be murdered in cold blood, that was the first and only such type of incident among India and BD. After that incident BSF don't take such chances.

Villagers in border areas are hostile because BSF is a major hindrance to their smuggling business.

And no, they were just 16, and they were murdered by the BGB, not by the villagers, BGB took them away and killed them (BGB had a different name then).

What are the Rules of engagement after crossing international border?

I think smuggling could be happening from both sides, India and Bangladesh and so does bribing. Hindrance in smuggling could not be an issue of hostility. There must be something more to it.

I meant BGB platoon and their own people, crowd control basically.

 

[Stannis Baratheon]

What insurgencies? Those small issues have been contained. In any case, we do not want to invade BD, so no question of having any dreams about it. There is no gain, no pride in invading a defenceless small country.

And I asked about real role that BD might play in Asia's maritime balance, not BD wet dreams!

Small insurgency! They kill hundreds to thousands of your security forces every year and you call that small! Also, those I mentioned are what is going to happen, if I had wet dreams than I would be saying Bangladesh attacking India, like the same wet dreams you people have about China. Or the wet dreams you have of becoming a permanent UNSC member or a Super Power.

 

[gslv mk3]

but if needed we will build frigates.

Claims...

ndia isn't that rich that it can just give away things like frigates.

We already do that- 'soft loans' kid.

See how bright the sky is lit. That's your submarine burning.

Do you even have a submarine ? You don't.We have a navy that operates nuclear attack submarines and Nuclear ballistic missile submarines.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_submarine_incidents_since_2000

 

[Stannis Baratheon]

We already do that- 'soft loans' kid.

Soft loans and giving away are 2 different things you dumb s**t.

Do you even have a submarine ? You don't.We have a navy that operates nuclear attack submarines and Nuclear ballistic missile submarines.

And you also have a population whose 60% don't know how to use a toilet. Difference is, we prefer to develop our country before we develop our military. Also, nations that don't have nukes, don't need nuclear submarines. Thus, we don't see a need for us to have any of those.

 

[gslv mk3]

Soft loans and giving away are 2 different things you dumb s**t.

I was talking both giving away & soft loans dumb bong.

And you also have a population whose 60% don't know how to use a toilet.

Since you want to indulge in pointless trolling,here are some facts for you.

In your country 17 % of population is undernourished,55 % of your urban population lives in slums,and 43% of your population earns less than $ 1.90 a day.

First fix your country before mocking others

Or the wet dreams you have of becoming a permanent UNSC member or a Super Power.

Haha...seems like your rear is on fire.No one gives a damn about your little insignificant country.

As for our UNSC seat,we have teamed up with other World Powers.Heard of G4 ?

Difference is, we prefer to develop our country before we develop our military.

Interesting,as our government spend just 6.47 % of our budget expenditure in defense and you spend 6.22% even when India faces much larger threats.

And since Indian GDP per capita and tax to GDP ratio are much higher yours the funding for 'human development programs are much larger.Last year,when your government spend $ $4.4 billion on 'education,science and technology' our government spend $ 66 billion,15 times.

Do remember that our population is only 7 times yours.

So this claim of your compatriots,that 'India wastes its resources in defense & space research while Bangladesh triumphs in human development' doesn't hold hot water !

Also, nations that don't have nukes, don't need nuclear submarines

And you can neither afford,nor build one.

 

[dray]

Also, nations that don't have nukes, don't need nuclear submarines.

Why?

 

[Nabil365]

Small insurgency! They kill hundreds to thousands of your security forces every year and you call that small! Also, those I mentioned are what is going to happen, if I had wet dreams than I would be saying Bangladesh attacking India, like the same wet dreams you people have about China. Or the wet dreams you have of becoming a permanent UNSC member or a Super Power.

Don't argue with these brainless monkeys.They like to spill their verbal diarrhea everywhere.Oops,I forgot they dont use toilet!!!:hahaha

 

[Stannis Baratheon]

Why?

Nuclear nations need nukes for launching ballistic missiles from the sea without being detected. The ballistic missiles that are launched from subs can't carry a heavy warhead as a land based (or ship) system would. Thus conventional explosives have little effect and nuclear warheads are used.

Also, nuclear subs are much heavier compared to diesel ones, for which they are the ones able to carry ballistic missiles and diesel subs are used for naval attack (destroying enemy subs and ships) due to their stealth capabilities.

 

[dray]

Nuclear nations need nukes for launching ballistic missiles from the sea without being detected. The ballistic missiles that are launched from subs can't carry a heavy warhead as a land based (or ship) system would. Thus conventional explosives have little effect and nuclear warheads are used.

Also, nuclear subs are much heavier compared to diesel ones, for which they are the ones able to carry ballistic missiles and diesel subs are used for naval attack (destroying enemy subs and ships) due to their stealth capabilities.

SSBNs are not the only type of nuclear powered submarine, what about SSN?

 

[Stannis Baratheon]

SSBNs are not the only type of nuclear powered submarine, what about SSN?

They can stay under-water for longer periods of time. Most of them stay sub-merged for upto six months. Since they use nuclear powered they can stay under water for longer periods of time. The strategy they offer is useful when you want your subs to lurk across foreign nations/regions far from home (like the Falklands). But there is a disadvantage and that is if that nation has a good submarine fleet itself.

But since they have very high costs (both making and maintaining), nations are switching to diesel subs and SSBN. Even the US are planning on acquiring diesel subs.

 

[dray]

They can stay under-water for longer periods of time. Most of them stay sub-merged for upto six months. Since they use nuclear powered they can stay under water for longer periods of time. The strategy they offer is useful when you want your subs to lurk across foreign nations/regions far from home (like the Falklands). But there is a disadvantage and that is if that nation has a good submarine fleet itself.

But since they have very high costs (both making and maintaining), nations are switching to diesel subs and SSBN. Even the US are planning on acquiring diesel subs.

SSNs are hunter killers, what you have copy-pasted applies to SSBNs.

Bangladesh needs both SSN and SSBN for power projection and maintaining Asia's maritime balance!

But since they have very high costs (both making and maintaining), nations are switching to diesel subs and SSBN. Even the US are planning on acquiring diesel subs.

And SSBNs are cheap?