Two completely different topics. Credit for the pathetic attempt at deflection.
It's a known fact that Nouri-al-Maliki was prejudiced against the Sunnis and made sure that it was mostly the Shi'ites who held the greater deal of political power.
If you want to make a comparison, East Pakistan and 1971 is a good place to start.
Give me a break. You can't just dismiss anything which doesn't go along with your deluded world view is propaganda.
Full of nonsense. First of all, this "worry about your state." cheap remark made by the Indians, Chinese and Iranians on this forum is absolutely pathetic. How about you worry about your own state first? Get off this Pakistani Defence Forum and return to your echo boxes where you can swallow the regurgitated propaganda of your fellow Iranians. If you're going to stay on this forum, get used to
opposing views and don't resort to cheap remarks like that.
Iran is safe and sound? Please, no jokes. How can Iran be safe when its been at this game of supporting militia groups and warlords all across the Middle East and Central Asia since the 1980s? Of course, Saudi Arabia will eventually be bitten in the *** by their own proxies, but Iran is big, Iran is stronk. Iran never fall. Shia militia groups are fighting in
4 fronts. You will eventually be bitten in the ***, either by the drug traffickers and warlords you support or your enemies.
My point isn't how the Iraqi army fell, but the fact that it was defeated on several fronts surprisingly quickly with our regional superpower, Iran barely capable of reacting. Reminds me of Iran and their support for their friend Gaddafi, who despite being confronted by the evil West and the Wahabist, Salafist, Reptilian Islamist Saudi filth, had very little backing.
Iran Backs Libyan Rebels, Chastises West Over Oil, Bahrain | The Iran Primer