Serpentine
INT'L MOD
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2011
- Messages
- 12,131
- Reaction score
- 30
- Country
- Location
Spare me from the nonsense. We have discussed this too much and I told you why I don't think Bahraini "revolution" as a rightful one. However, to make it easier for you to get, both Jordanians and Bahrainis who resorted to violence are terrorists. Why? because both resorted to violence at the very early stage of their demonstrations trying to impose their demands on the rest of people and ignoring governments calls for dialogues. Protesters in the most democratic countries get beaten up and jailed if they resorted to violence. I gave you Jordanian case as an example to make sure that there are a Sunni and Shia in both cases.
BTW, Bashar is the most racist Arab secular leader of all times. So, according to you I should like him.
Somboso strikes again.
Oh, how nice.So Bahrain revolution is not a righteous one, but the FSA terrorists and AlQaeda are the freedom fighters.
Can you even compare the use of violence by Bahrainis and FSA ? What did protesters in Bahrain do in very first stage of revolution? What are they doing now?Still cmong to streets chanting 'Down with king'. Egyptians too used molotoves in their revolution, so as very few Bahrainis. And they have every right to do so, being shoot at by foreign troops and their own dictator's army.So, wasn't Egyptian revolution a righteous one?
Believe me if Iran had slightest intention to interfere in Bahrain, we would kick the king in his back in few hours, with all those Saudi guardians around him.The day Iran starts arming the revolutionaries in Bahrain, the king and his wives would escape to KSA, the same fate as many dictators.They are just using Iran excuse to deny the rightful demands of the majority of the country.