What's new

Babur and Phalcon ?

Thats right but then you'll be wasting an expensive asset for just few kilometres additional gain, we all know it can't carry anything unconventional..

Depends on what's more important, destroying a high valued enemy asset or having another missile in the arsenal. :azn:

Obviously the range will be incresed more than a few kms
 
.
Are you serious? Kindly elaborate which radar exactly apart from EL/M-2075?





1. Israeli Aerostats...............EL/M 2083 radar with range 500km......Elta Systems EL/M-2083 Aerostat Programmable Radar (APR) is derived from the company's L-band (1 to 2 GHz) EL/L-2080 'Green Pine' ground-based, phased-array, search, acquisition and fire-control radar and is described as being a 3-D sensor that can acquire and track targets at both "high" and "low" altitudes, with the latter height band including targets such as cruise missiles, unmanned aerial vehicles and microlights being used by special forces or terrorists.

2. Arudhra MPR...........The Arudra radar has a range of 300 kilometers, twice the range of the 3D Rohini radar (150 km). With advanced "electronic counter-counter measures", the new radar being inducted will be integrated into the IACCS (integrated air command and control system). The IACCS is a fully-automated network being established to integrate the wide array of military radars with each other as well as with civilian radars.



At short range the detection and interception could be by.......

1. Rajendra Radar with The Akash SAM.........................in fact Akash has been tested several times for crusie missile interception with Lakshya PTA mimicking a terrain hugging cruise missile. Interception range 25 to 30 kms . Detection range 60 to 100 kms.

2. Spyder SAM with Elta EL/M-2106 ATAR 3D surveillance radar which can detect a moving object in a clutter ............operation range 15-20 kms..............these are specifically purchased by IAF to safeguard high value targets against cruise missiles and fighter Planes.

3. Systems like Tunguska could be useful at short ranges.

Future systems which are in development include............

1. AAD
2. Barack NG/Barack 8
3. Akash 2
4. Maitre with France.
 
.
Opss, sorry... It looks you didn't like some extra respect for missile.. I rectify my mistake, its supersonic.. Now tell me about possible increase in range?
Okie.........The range cannot be increased.After completing 290KM,the fuel supply cuts off and it just drops dead.
Happy,troll?
 
.
We can afford to use all of them if the need comes!
We have several squadrons of the Missiles.
@the emboldened part-Yeah sure,whatever floats your rock.

Sure, why should I bother about your wastes...

I am still waiting for some info on additional range that brhamos can achieve...

---------- Post added at 06:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:44 PM ----------

Okie.........The range cannot be increased.After completing 290KM,the fuel supply cuts off and it just drops dead.
Happy,troll?

Troll! Am I? really!... Asking for some info is troll, strange!!
 
. .
Sure, why should I bother about your wastes...

I am still waiting for some info on additional range that brhamos can achieve...

Troll! Am I? really!... Asking for some info is troll, strange!!

Payloadrange.jpg


here's the range-payload graph of a missile, help yourself understanding it.
 
.
Depends on what's more important, destroying a high valued enemy asset or having another missile in the arsenal. :azn:

Obviously the range will be incresed more than a few kms

Absolutely, I agree with the logic but my point is rather more specific, reducing payload means reducing the efficacy of a missile in terms of destruction.

Obviously the range will be incresed more than a few kms

fine, reducing it to 150 kgs gives you what range?
 
. .
Payloadrange.jpg


here's the range-payload graph of a missile, help yourself understanding it.

I know about the relation between payload and range... Thats not my confusion..

I just want to know maximum range of Brahos after a certain decrease in its payload? I mean limits for both payload and range?

---------- Post added at 07:18 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:16 PM ----------

Read the emboldened parts and S&B's reply:lol:

Dont backtrack..... Share your info on Brahmos range.
 
.
I know about the relation between payload and range... Thats not my confusion..

I just want to know maximum range of Brahos after a certain decrease in its payload? I mean limits for both payload and range.

Weight of Brahmos is 3000 kg, while carrying 300 kg of payload upto 290 km. I'm searching the net for the amount of propellant used in Brahmos. By cutting the payload weight by 150 kg, range of brahmos can be increased by 15-20%.
 
. .
Weight of Brahmos is 3000 kg, while carrying 300 kg of payload upto 290 km. I'm searching the net for the amount of propellant used in Brahmos. By cutting the payload weight by 150 kg, range of brahmos can be increased by 15-20%.

Okay.... By cutting off the payload to half gives you 15 to 20% extra range that means additional 45 to 60 kms are added in actual range.. Now its 335-350 kms.

Where's the Lord Of Gondor??
 
.
Okay.... By cutting off the payload to half gives you 15 to 20% extra range that means additional 45 to 60 kms are added in actual range.. Now its 335-350 kms.

Where's the Lord Of Gondor??
We use air launched version of Brahmos coming soon.
If you are not satisfied enough , wait for Brahmos II/LRCM/Nirbhay II
 
.
:Pbabur cannot hug terrain for 300km

It can or cannot hug terrain is irrelevant to my question...You answer me my question, can you hit launch center of babur if it is beyond 300 kms somewhere between 400 to 450 kms?

Please keep your own scenario in mind before replying....

---------- Post added at 07:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:44 PM ----------

We use air launched version of Brahmos coming soon.
If you are not satisfied enough , wait for Brahmos II/LRCM/Nirbhay II

Whats wrong with you? I thought we were exclusively talking about Brahmos, one in operation right now... Kindly grab the context before jumping in.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom