B-21 Bomber unveiling tonight

[Rusty2]

LOL! Yeah sure.

So how many brown babies do you think these jets will kill?
I am going to say around half a mill in its life time.
Too small?

 

[Oldman1]

So how many brown babies do you think these jets will kill?
I am going to say around half a mill in its life time.
Too small?

Depends on the population and their willingness to kill each other over religion. Lots of suicide bombings and dead squads, the usual.

 

[Rusty2]

Depends on the population and their willingness to kill each other over religion. Lots of suicide bombings and dead squads, the usual.

you must have a learning disability so it's understandable why you can't seem to stay on topic.
The question was how many brown babies will THIS BOMBER kill. Not what your wet dreams were.

 

[Oldman1]

you must have a learning disability so it's understandable why you can't seem to stay on topic.
The question was how many brown babies will THIS BOMBER kill. Not what your wet dreams were.

Oh sorry. Was just mentioning of future suicide bombers. On the other question, depends on what the war is. If its China or North Korea, could kill tens of thousands of Asians. If its Iran, tens of thousands. Same for the Russians. Hence why they know the bomber doesn't discriminate.

 

[Rusty2]

Oh sorry. Was just mentioning of future suicide bombers. On the other question, depends on what the war is. If its China or North Korea, could kill tens of thousands of Asians. If its Iran, tens of thousands. Same for the Russians. Hence why they know the bomber doesn't discriminate.

Yeah I agree, it will most likely be one of the best brown babies murder machine mankind has ever made. lol, those babies will have no idea what hit them.

 

[Oldman1]

Yeah I agree, it will most likely be one of the best brown babies murder machine mankind has ever made. lol, those babies will have no idea what hit them.

Yeah hence why Russia and China wants to create such similar Brown baby killing machines.

 

[Oldman1]

Now I'm waiting for the NGAD reveal. They should also think of replacing the B-1 in the near future and the B-52 as well long term. In my fantasy, it should be the size of the 777-ER or more. The 777-10X is about 263 feet long, B1 is only 146 feet long, while look similar to the B-1, however the wings should be fixed open instead of variable moving wings that cause headaches in terms of maintenance and cost. So subsonic B-1 bomber the size of the 777-ER with opened and fixed wings.

 

[VCheng]

If B-21 is piece of crap, than I am Nancy Pelosi.

Well, most of PDF knows that Murrikans are fat, dumb and lazy. Just how good of a plane can they make?

 

[PakFactor]

Bombers make it possible to attack, degrade, and destroy increasingly sophisticated defenses and infrastructure of a region in limited sorties. To bomb a country back to the stone age if necessary.

This comparison shows that just two B-2A are sufficient to produce "battlefield effects" that would take multiple aircraft to replicate otherwise. And there is no need to use Tankers for B-2A.

- Costs are reduced.
- Complexity is reduced.
- Probability of suffering losses is reduced.

Unfortunately, what is not understood is that knowledge and research isn’t immediately thrown into the public eyes within the US defense industry (DARPA) and then the massive black programs budget that never sees the light of day until 40 years later.

There is stuff out of groom lake and other facilities that is decades ahead -

But why remind people of that? Instead, tell people that Murrikans are dumb lazy bastards. Let us reinforce that as much as possible.

B-21? Piece of crap!

I was reading about the SR-71, which was back in the 1960s; they used High-Frequency Soundwave to fuse Quartz and Titanium so that it didn't cause vibrations that would prevent taking pictures at high speeds. Alluding to @SQ8, we haven't scratched the surface of what else will come out in the future.

A-12 Blackbird: Breaking Through Technological Barriers (thesr71blackbird.com)

 

[VCheng]

I was reading about the SR-22, which was back in the 1960s; they used High-Frequency Soundwave to fuse Quartz and Titanium so that it didn't cause vibrations that would prevent taking pictures at high speeds. Alluding to @SQ8, we haven't scratched the surface of what else will come out in the future.

A-12 Blackbird: Breaking Through Technological Barriers (thesr71blackbird.com)

SSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Now repeat after me: Those dumb lazy fat Americans are so stupid they cannot make anything including good airplanes.

 

[KAL-EL]

Forget the B-21, the rest of the world, Europe included, will take decades to match the technology of the B-2 bomber which was made decades ago.

This B-21 underscores America’s unmatched unrivaled technological superiority.

^^This ×1000

The B-2 is how many decades old now?

Yet, we all know the list of countries that would love to get their hands on one is quite large.

Only prideful hypernationalist fools would be in pure denial over that

 

[jhungary]

Now I'm waiting for the NGAD reveal. They should also think of replacing the B-1 in the near future and the B-52 as well long term. In my fantasy, it should be the size of the 777-ER or more. The 777-10X is about 263 feet long, B1 is only 146 feet long, while look similar to the B-1, however the wings should be fixed open instead of variable moving wings that cause headaches in terms of maintenance and cost. So subsonic B-1 bomber the size of the 777-ER with opened and fixed wings.

This is sadly probably will not happen. Not talking about the replacement of B-1 and B-52, but I am talking about the replacement being the same "outlook" as a civ air.

Read somewhere (probably Air Force magazine) a long time ago back when I was still in the Military, there were an article that talks about the future bomber and why they don't make the bomber bigger like an airliner? The problem is, they don't want the signature of a military aircraft to look like Civ Air, because that would jeopardise the civilian flight in war. While Boeing 707 and 727 were used by the USAF, but all of them are without offensive capability

If they started making bomber out of 727 or aircraft that emit similar signature of any civ air, that would put all aircraft at risk, it maybe the biggest spoof of all time but then you are talking about hundred, if not thousand aircraft being at risk, that's why they won't make these bomber bigger or as big as the civ air........

 

[Goritoes]

Well, most of PDF knows that Murrikans are fat, dumb and lazy. Just how good of a plane can they make?

Well a lot of them are FAT and LAZY as obesity is a big Issue in America, but those who work they work with dedication, no matter how much one doesn't like it for whatever XYZ reasons truth is America is by far remain unmatched in Military Technology.

 

[VCheng]

Well a lot of them are FAT and LAZY as obesity is a big Issue in America, but those who work they work with dedication, no matter how much one doesn't like it for whatever XYZ reasons truth is America is by far remain unmatched in Military Technology.

As I said above, SSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Now repeat after me: Those dumb lazy fat Americans are so stupid they cannot make anything including good airplanes.

 

[Irfan Baloch]

So how many brown babies do you think these jets will kill?
I am going to say around half a mill in its life time.
Too small?

that is a very retarded post man.