What's new

Awami govt proved again - they are indian stooges

The true Bangladeshi government should be pro-India. Being anti-India is unnatural for a Bangladeshi. Because Bangladesh is a part of cultural India. Bangladesh is India.

That is not correct or i will say overstatement. Bangladesh is close to Bengali culture and culture of east India, agree with you that it was unfortunate for Bangladesh that at the time of partition it was made to get part of pakistan, there were no big leaders in Bangladesh at that time in central politics. the Punjabi zamindars wanted pakistan for there interests, as india in 1945 decided to do land reforms. Bengal was the poorest state at the time british left, and further pakistan exploited it for next 25 yrs... Bangladesh had it been part of India from beginning would have been relatively prosperous, for example look at Bhutan and Nepal, though they are not part of India ..but there is not hunger and major proverty.
Both are sovereign countries, Both nepali's and Bhutanese do not need work permit or visa to visit or work in india.
 
.
Both are sovereign countries, Both nepali's and Bhutanese do not need work permit or visa to visit or work in india.
That is because they are still culturally Indian.

Culturally Indian = Really Indian.
 
.
so its clear now ..way to go for Bangladesh and indians should have mor humility towards Bangladeshi settlers...India should not have porous border any more with Bangladesh, instead it should be open border. like with Bhutan and Nepal. only few checkpost to be there checking smuggling etc. Bangladesh Nationals should be allowed to work live stay in India as Indians do...however there passports with be Bangladesh passports. Only they will not have voting rights same for Indians in Bangladesh. way to go !!
 
.
That is not correct or i will say overstatement. Bangladesh is close to Bengali culture and culture of east India, agree with you that it was unfortunate for Bangladesh that at the time of partition it was made to get part of pakistan, there were no big leaders in Bangladesh at that time in central politics.

Could you please take off the colour prism from your eyes and then read the history to know which group of people formed Muslim League and then initiated the Pakistan movement. Read first and then come to write in an open forum. I just hope Indian education level is not as low as the content of your post suggests.
 
.
so its clear now ..way to go for Bangladesh and indians should have mor humility towards Bangladeshi settlers...India should not have porous border any more with Bangladesh, instead it should be open border. like with Bhutan and Nepal. only few checkpost to be there checking smuggling etc. Bangladesh Nationals should be allowed to work live stay in India as Indians do...however there passports with be Bangladesh passports. Only they will not have voting rights same for Indians in Bangladesh. way to go !!
NO WAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Indo-bangla border should sealed air tight. All Muslim bangla immigrants should be sent back to Bangladesh. Non-Muslims cannot be sent back because they are ill-treated in Bangladesh. We should fence the entire border.
 
.
That is not correct or i will say overstatement. Bangladesh is close to Bengali culture and culture of east India, agree with you that it was unfortunate for Bangladesh that at the time of partition it was made to get part of pakistan, there were no big leaders in Bangladesh at that time in central politics. the Punjabi zamindars wanted pakistan for there interests, as india in 1945 decided to do land reforms. Bengal was the poorest state at the time british left, and further pakistan exploited it for next 25 yrs... Bangladesh had it been part of India from beginning would have been relatively prosperous, for example look at Bhutan and Nepal, though they are not part of India ..but there is not hunger and major proverty.
Both are sovereign countries, Both nepali's and Bhutanese do not need work permit or visa to visit or work in india.

Huhhh... way to go bro...
But you need little more reading to do before just making an impression like the prime minister of India. Bangladesh economy is bigger than the combined economy of Nepal + Bhutan + Srilanka + Myanmar. Got it?
If we were part of India what would had happend? Dont know but let me guess.
Would it be a better state than WB or Assam or Jharkhand or Bihar? I doubt. Just do your math considering, Bangladesh did belong to the poorest, least developed region in the sub continent in 1947.
Every Bangladeshi believes that we could come that far only because we had a independent country. :cheers:
 
.
NO WAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Indo-bangla border should sealed air tight. All Muslim bangla immigrants should be sent back to Bangladesh. Non-Muslims cannot be sent back because they are ill-treated in Bangladesh. We should fence the entire border.

You are right on money. Border must be sealed off. India is way too volatile for us and we dont want any spill over effect on us.
 
. .
Do you Bangladeshis accept two-nation theory ?

If yes Why broke from Pakistan ?
If NO why can't you rejoin India ?

We do belive in a independent secular bengal. in 1947 it was done in a haste and lots of thing just got messed up which needed to be corrected in 1971.

No thanks we are not joining India. We will be too much trouble for you. ;)
 
.
so its clear now ..way to go for Bangladesh and indians should have mor humility towards Bangladeshi settlers...India should not have porous border any more with Bangladesh, instead it should be open border. like with Bhutan and Nepal. only few checkpost to be there checking smuggling etc. Bangladesh Nationals should be allowed to work live stay in India as Indians do...however there passports with be Bangladesh passports. Only they will not have voting rights same for Indians in Bangladesh. way to go !!

You are right on money. Border must be sealed off. India is way too volatile for us and we dont want any spill over effect on us.
Then why doesn't Bangladesh start fencing there side of the border?

Has Bangladesh ever done 1 meter of fencing on the entire Indo-Bangla border?

Those who are afraid of there neighbors make fences.
Bangladesh is not afraid of India,that's why it is not building fences on international border despite widespread smuggling and infiltration.

India is afraid of Bangladesh that's why it is building the fence by spending billions of dollars.
 
.
cultrurally Bhutanese are inidan??? you joking right?
They are Buddhists and Hindus. The people of Bhutan wish the 'Land of Buddha' happiness. They consider India as their spiritual homeland..and so yes they are culturally Indian. That's the most important factor.
 
.
Pagans dont draw to weird conclusions,and claim sovereign countries as india and the people as indians....just a friendly advice,take a look at the world map!
 
.
Then why doesn't Bangladesh start fencing there side of the border?

Has Bangladesh ever done 1 meter of fencing on the entire Indo-Bangla border?

Those who are afraid of there neighbors make fences.
Bangladesh is not afraid of India,that's why it is not building fences on international border despite widespread smuggling and infiltration.

India is afraid of Bangladesh that's why it is building the fence by spending billions of dollars.

We have far better thing to do than apeasing religious fanatics.
 
.
They are Buddhists and Hindus. The people of Bhutan wish the 'Land of Buddha' happiness. They consider India as their spiritual homeland..and so yes they are culturally Indian. That's the most important factor.

Huh.. whatever yu say.. A Bhutanese could answer that better. :lol:
 
.
Pagans dont draw to weird conclusions,and claim sovereign countries as india and the people as indians....just a friendly advice,take a look at the world map!

Political boundaries means nothing...nada..zlitch ..!!!

Do you know why Nepalis join Indian Army? Because they feel Indian(or more precisely as a part of the subcontinental civilization, this feeling is more important than political boundaries)
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom