IndoCarib
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2011
- Messages
- 10,784
- Reaction score
- -14
- Country
- Location
AUSTRALIA'S ban on uranium exports to India is set to be overturned, with Prime Minister Julia Gillard declaring the present policy outdated.
Ms Gillard will push for a change in party policy at next month's Labor national conference to lift the ban, bringing Australia into line with America's thinking.
In an article in today's Age, Ms Gillard declares it is ''time for Labor to modernise our platform and enable us to strengthen our connection with dynamic, democratic India''.
The U-turn, Ms Gillard's most radical foreign policy initiative to date, would substantially improve relations with India, which has greatly resented that Australia discriminates against it - because it is not a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty - while being willing to sell to China. The change will be opposed by the Left but will get through the conference, backed by the Prime Minister's authority and the Right's numbers.
Buoyed by some improvement in the polls, including yesterday's Nielsen poll showing her approval jumping 6 points, Ms Gillard wants to use the conference - at which she is looking forward to ''some noise'' - to stamp her mark on the party.
She is mounting her case for exporting uranium to India on the grounds it will benefit Australia's jobs and economy as well as the bilateral relationship. She is also arguing that the present ban has become anachronistic.
Ms Gillard writes that India is one of our nearest neighbours, long a close partner and the world's biggest democracy. ''Yet despite the links of language, heritage and democratic values in one important regard we treat India differently.
''We will not sell India uranium for peaceful purposes - though Canada is preparing to - while policy allows us to export it to countries such as China, Japan and the United States.''
She stresses that ''we must, of course, expect of India the same standards we do of all countries for uranium export''. These include strict adherence to international arrangements and strong bilateral undertakings and transparency measures, providing assurances the uranium would only be used for peaceful purposes.
Pressure to change the platform has been mounting, with Resources Minister Martin Ferguson leading the charge. Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd is also in favour of a switch. But the proposed change has not gone to cabinet, on the grounds that it is the PM's position for the party's conference, rather than a government policy.
The Greens will be against exports to India, but Ms Gillard, who has been painted as the creature of Bob Brown, is quite happy to be differentiated from her minority partner when there is an opportunity.
Those urging change argue that refusing to sell uranium to India made sense when it was part of an international strategy to bring it into the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. But, they say, after the 2007 US-India civil nuclear agreement lifted the de facto international ban on nuclear co-operation with India, it is not sensible for Australia to stand alone.
Ministers have been annoyed, however, that India has been trying to pressure Australia publicly, complicating moves to lift the ban. Mr Rudd recently pointed out sharply that India had no problem with getting supplies elsewhere.
The present ALP platform, banning exports to non-signatories, dates from 2007.
The Age reported last month that the two countries had begun a dialogue that was likely to canvass uranium sales if the ALP changed its policy.
According to WikiLeaks cables Mr Ferguson told American officials in 2009 that there could be a deal to sell to India within years.
Read more: PM backs uranium for India
Ms Gillard will push for a change in party policy at next month's Labor national conference to lift the ban, bringing Australia into line with America's thinking.
In an article in today's Age, Ms Gillard declares it is ''time for Labor to modernise our platform and enable us to strengthen our connection with dynamic, democratic India''.
The U-turn, Ms Gillard's most radical foreign policy initiative to date, would substantially improve relations with India, which has greatly resented that Australia discriminates against it - because it is not a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty - while being willing to sell to China. The change will be opposed by the Left but will get through the conference, backed by the Prime Minister's authority and the Right's numbers.
Buoyed by some improvement in the polls, including yesterday's Nielsen poll showing her approval jumping 6 points, Ms Gillard wants to use the conference - at which she is looking forward to ''some noise'' - to stamp her mark on the party.
She is mounting her case for exporting uranium to India on the grounds it will benefit Australia's jobs and economy as well as the bilateral relationship. She is also arguing that the present ban has become anachronistic.
Ms Gillard writes that India is one of our nearest neighbours, long a close partner and the world's biggest democracy. ''Yet despite the links of language, heritage and democratic values in one important regard we treat India differently.
''We will not sell India uranium for peaceful purposes - though Canada is preparing to - while policy allows us to export it to countries such as China, Japan and the United States.''
She stresses that ''we must, of course, expect of India the same standards we do of all countries for uranium export''. These include strict adherence to international arrangements and strong bilateral undertakings and transparency measures, providing assurances the uranium would only be used for peaceful purposes.
Pressure to change the platform has been mounting, with Resources Minister Martin Ferguson leading the charge. Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd is also in favour of a switch. But the proposed change has not gone to cabinet, on the grounds that it is the PM's position for the party's conference, rather than a government policy.
The Greens will be against exports to India, but Ms Gillard, who has been painted as the creature of Bob Brown, is quite happy to be differentiated from her minority partner when there is an opportunity.
Those urging change argue that refusing to sell uranium to India made sense when it was part of an international strategy to bring it into the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. But, they say, after the 2007 US-India civil nuclear agreement lifted the de facto international ban on nuclear co-operation with India, it is not sensible for Australia to stand alone.
Ministers have been annoyed, however, that India has been trying to pressure Australia publicly, complicating moves to lift the ban. Mr Rudd recently pointed out sharply that India had no problem with getting supplies elsewhere.
The present ALP platform, banning exports to non-signatories, dates from 2007.
The Age reported last month that the two countries had begun a dialogue that was likely to canvass uranium sales if the ALP changed its policy.
According to WikiLeaks cables Mr Ferguson told American officials in 2009 that there could be a deal to sell to India within years.
Read more: PM backs uranium for India
this is the counter-post 
![Bl[i]tZ](/data/avatars/m/41/41754.jpg?1322350299){kind=avatar}
Lets see how long she can fiddle with Israelis get ready for a lesson from Israelis. 
)... we need to improve our policies, our sincerity and our performance in all fields, and the world will respect us automatically.
