Penguin
ELITE MEMBER
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/General.jpg)
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2009
- Messages
- 13,047
- Reaction score
- 56
Manpads v Mi-17
Manpads v Mi24 Hind
MANDPADs v AN-30
IF you intended to speak about a plane blown up, why then did you include the word BEAM in your original post?
Your inital post suggested Su-25 being unsuitable because vulnerable to MANPADS. In fact, all planes are. And types like SU-25 less so. I know what I would rather use, given a choice of aircraft.
![46860_625007450868374_1349015780_n.jpg](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Ffbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net%2Fhphotos-ak-prn1%2Ft1%2Fq71%2F46860_625007450868374_1349015780_n.jpg&hash=6d847fb747d6866491f3eb24d0403858)
Manpads v Mi24 Hind
![ukraine-helicopter-slaviansk.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.worldbulletin.net%2Fnews%2F2014%2F05%2F02%2Fukraine-helicopter-slaviansk.jpg&hash=34dc1bf10e750a57454bf5318e8296e7)
MANDPADs v AN-30
![BpdDXsoCAAAt08s.png:medium](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FBpdDXsoCAAAt08s.png%3Amedium&hash=f06934cea88e9be928ae223d2ed7c45a)
![AN-30B-site-survey.png](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Ftheaviationist.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F06%2FAN-30B-site-survey.png&hash=7dc81aa2b3f86feba196f6389844a893)
i didnt refer to being lit up as in actual sense that beams are used, what i meant was plane being blown up. I guess i should be exact when talking about missiles and thei tracking.
IF you intended to speak about a plane blown up, why then did you include the word BEAM in your original post?
Your inital post suggested Su-25 being unsuitable because vulnerable to MANPADS. In fact, all planes are. And types like SU-25 less so. I know what I would rather use, given a choice of aircraft.
Last edited: