What's new

Army wants ‘Show of Force’ , Government not keen !!

Showing force in not in the Indian interests. Why play the war that you can't win? Smart move by gov.

then why did pak play many wars with india since its inception? beleive me, china has lived its life and they are not running towards it demise...China has no backing except from the least worth countries like Pak......isnt it like Germany under hitler? China is still not the world power, they are still dependent on their exports and dollar reserve....neither of them china can control in case of war!!!
 
Did you meant status quo ?? If yes then you are horribly off the mark in your history lessons.Refresh it
Mercy in 62, doesn't your mastrters told you about lack logistic supply ???

Logistic supply issue applies through out the Indo-china border. chola incident which happened in the sikkim terrain is no different, in fact one of the major reason of annexing sikkim was to use it as a buffer in the himalayan border against chinese incursion. Sikkim is a plain where troops can be fast mobilized and is a gateway across himalayas similar to Nepal and Bhutan which are also a buffer zone in India's eye. No wonder U want to have firm grip of Bhutan while nepal is trying to break free. And U are forgetting that 1962 happened due to chanakya nehru's aggressive forward policy while chola incident is a short border skirmishes. We also spanked Indian buttt in 2001 border skirmishes.
 
Logistic supply issue applies through out the Indo-china border. chola incident which happened in the sikkim terrain is no different, in fact one of the major reason of annexing sikkim was to use it as a buffer in the himalayan border against chinese incursion. Sikkim is a plain where troops can be fast mobilized and is a gateway across himalayas similar to Nepal and Bhutan which are also a buffer zone in India's eye. No wonder U want to have firm grip of Bhutan while nepal is trying to break free. And U are forgetting that 1962 happened due to chanakya nehru's aggressive forward policy while chola incident is a short border skirmishes. We also spanked Indian buttt in 2001 border skirmishes.
What is the point of bragging so much if in the end India won in 67.

We don't want any grip on any friendly countries .You know what I mean ??

Yes and hence after 2001 Rawami took over your nation and only GOI knows how we are punishing you for that incident.Now you are just a vassal state of India.
 
Logistic supply issue applies through out the Indo-china border. chola incident which happened in the sikkim terrain is no different, in fact one of the major reason of annexing sikkim was to use it as a buffer in the himalayan border against chinese incursion. Sikkim is a plain where troops can be fast mobilized and is a gateway across himalayas similar to Nepal and Bhutan which are also a buffer zone in India's eye. No wonder U want to have firm grip of Bhutan while nepal is trying to break free. And U are forgetting that 1962 happened due to chanakya nehru's aggressive forward policy while chola incident is a short border skirmishes. We also spanked Indian buttt in 2001 border skirmishes.
:omghaha::omghaha:

say it again slowly S P A N K E D

now get out of sleep
 
What is the point of bragging so much if in the end India won in 67.

We don't want any grip on any friendly countries .You know what I mean ??

Just stating facts when U bought up the issue of chola and logistic supply. And yes U do control Bhutan completely. Its a defacto Indian state. They even need India's permission in issue regarding foreign affairs. Is there any reason for Bhutan to not have a diplomatic mission even in USA when all the UN member states have a place there. Nepal was in similar dilemma but now broke free to a great degree. Chanakyans are hegemonic bigots that only understands the language of strength.
 
Just stating facts when U bought up the issue of chola and logistic supply. And yes U do control Bhutan completely. Its a defacto Indian state. They even need India's permission in issue regarding foreign affairs. Is there any reason for Bhutan to not have a diplomatic mission even in USA when all the UN member states have a place there. Nepal was in similar dilemma but now broke free to a great degree. Chanakyans are hegemonic bigots that only understands the language of strength.

Correct me if I'm Wrong , Are you trying to tell me that Nepal a Hindu India Frendly Nation is going to Allow or Join with China to Take on India?
and Ya Nehru No longer alive or this isn't 62 any more so Wake up
 
Yes and hence after 2001 Rawami took over your nation and only GOI knows how we are punishing you for that incident.Now you are just a vassal state of India.

Rawami took over in 2009. And will be ousted soon inshallah. And yes we know how U are robbing our country. But then again we are used to chanakyans hegemonism. U guys couldn't turn us into a bhutan or sikkim from 72-75 while U gave everything U had trying to do so. U have to kill all 150 mn muslims of this country to make us an effective vassal.
 
time to teach China a big big lesson...

I think its been stupid from India to let Chinese soldier come in....

India should have followed a very clear policy since 1980s onwards....

Even a bird across the Chinese border would be fried and made ghost for the dinner....

I bet Chinese wont dare sent any soldier 10 KMs near to border from their own side....

its only due to the DUMB agreements on peaceful methods of border mechanism that give the Chinese the opportunities to do circus...

the enemy should know crossing border even in sleep would be impossible...

What should be India's policy now:

India should try diplomacy for 1 more week. if solved good. otherwise go to step two

encircle the Chinese camp from all sides. and ask them to surrender or take them into custody. IF they agree good. Otherwise take step three.

Tell the Chinese that no helicopter will be allowed to enter Indian airspace.. if it enters it will be shot. No helicopter enters then good, the Chinese soldiers would give up in few days due to lack of supplies.

Keep suffiicient forces as back up. If Chinese helicopter enters, give warnings. IF it doesn't go back. boom down goes a cheap heli.

then wait and watch. If China escalates, escalate to equal proportions. Let the burden of the Choice of war be on Chinese and let them escalate the situation.
 
Just stating facts when U bought up the issue of chola and logistic supply. And yes U do control Bhutan completely. Its a defacto Indian state. They even need India's permission in issue regarding foreign affairs. Is there any reason for Bhutan to not have a diplomatic mission even in USA when all the UN member states have a place there. Nepal was in similar dilemma but now broke free to a great degree. Chanakyans are hegemonic bigots that only understands the language of strength.

Did you call us bigots ??? Then why are you BDeshi beggars pole vaulting into India ??

If we were hegomons then in 71 itself we would have merged you to fulfill the dream of Akhand Bharat.

Rawami took over in 2009. And will be ousted soon inshallah. And yes we know how U are robbing our country. But then again we are used to chanakyans hegemonism. U guys couldn't turn us into a bhutan or sikkim from 72-75 while U gave everything U had trying to do so. U have to kill all 150 mn muslims of this country to make us an effective vassal.

We don't believe in genocides we have devised more subtle ways to control you.
 
Logistic supply issue applies through out the Indo-china border. chola incident which happened in the sikkim terrain is no different, in fact one of the major reason of annexing sikkim was to use it as a buffer in the himalayan border against chinese incursion. Sikkim is a plain where troops can be fast mobilized and is a gateway across himalayas similar to Nepal and Bhutan which are also a buffer zone in India's eye. No wonder U want to have firm grip of Bhutan while nepal is trying to break free. And U are forgetting that 1962 happened due to chanakya nehru's aggressive forward policy while chola incident is a short border skirmishes. We also spanked Indian buttt in 2001 border skirmishes.

Again Poor Nehru is no more man, Our current Generals and Govrn won't do the same Mistake.... In reply to China's Rail Network we're Building Roads Right, till the work finishes Many of the Inidan troops are stationed in North, If they can mount dozens of Troops then so do we can,.. and the cargo planes which India has more than enough to Air lift the troops and Arms to those areas in time... so no need to worry about logistics....We aren't fool to not to have an contingency plan... we may just down play it.
 
China is in no position to fight a war with India right now with all the troubles in the SCS and with Japan...

time to blow the Chinese bluff... as soon as IA is involved the Chinese would withdraw just before the moment or they would be defeated in a border war
 
Did you call us bigots ??? Then why are you BDeshi beggars pole vaulting into India ??

If we were hegomons then in 71 itself we would have merged you to fulfill the dream of Akhand Bharat.

NO one paul vaults into your shining sickular country. Stop repeating this myth and go gossip this with one of your fellow chanakyan countrymen. NO human being in his/her sane mind will pole vault into a garbage dump. Only lunatic idiots can even comprehend doing such a thing. I hope U genuinely don't believe in such farce otherwise U know what U are and should go see a doctor :rolleyes:

And yes U did try it from 72-75. One of India's major condition was that BD won't have a standing military. Indira was pretty open about it. She even didn't want the troops to leave BD and robbed millions of $$ (in 1970s terms) worth of industrial machinery from BD. Don't keep on blabbering the same thing like a boring tape recorder. :coffee:
 
NO one paul vaults into your shining sickular country. Stop repeating this myth and go gossip this with one of your fellow chanakyan countrymen. NO human being in his/her sane mind will pole vault into a garbage dump. Only lunatic idiots can even comprehend doing such a thing. I hope U genuinely don't believe in such farce otherwise U know what U are and should go see a doctor :rolleyes:

And yes U did try it from 72-75. One of India's major condition was that BD won't have a standing military. Indira was pretty open about it. She even didn't want the troops to leave BD and robbed millions of $$ (in 1970s terms) worth of industrial machinery from BD. Don't keep on blabbering the same thing as a boring tape recorder. :coffee:

hey stop your OFF TOPIC posts..

we dont want to discuss a tiny tiny BD in this thread... this is for India and China....
 
cheerleaders should calm down!

Talks are already on at the highest level, either this issue will sorted out diplomatically or else no one can stop IA from kicking these PLA troops out from Indian Territory just like 1987. Its just that GOI is playing safe and dont wanted to be accused of aggressive response from world community after escalation, GOI is playing Quite Maturely here. Trying every step up till the last resort "Use of Force".


it is useless to cry over spilt milk , better need to protect remaining borders rather than crying for whats by gone ..

And you should mark my words, nothing is Gone. Either this issue will get sorted out diplomatically (Most Likely) Or else PLA will get kicked out by IA from Our territory.

Just wait and watch.
 
hey stop your OFF TOPIC posts..

we dont want to discuss a tiny tiny BD in this thread... this is for India and China....

U should tell that to your fellow countrymen @SURYA-1. He seems pretty obsessed about tiny tiny BD like the rest of PDF indians here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom