kadamba-warrior
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2012
- Messages
- 1,542
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
The bottom line of the article got lost somehow, I am afraid. Its primary objective was not to show that terrorism based upon Islamic ideologies does not exist at all, but to emphasize on the fact that irreligious political extremism against the democratic institution poses greater threat for its extensiveness in terms of human lives lost which gets quite unnoticed in Indian societies today.
Don't you think that the bottom line that the article tried to highlight, itself is inaccurate?
If you are talking about extensiveness of the damaged by religious terrorism, in Pakistan alone, Islamic extremism killed 80000 in less than a decade and similar numbers in one Indian state of J&K. I am not even talking about Middle East or Nigeria, Kenya where the damages are far worse.
I don't, for a second, believe that all Muslims are terrorists, but don't you think that the prospects of 200 millions picking up a gun (because some bigot in Muslim community twisted their scriptures and convinced others to pick up a gun, as it so often happens among Muslims) are far more terrifying than those of Bodos or Maoists? Who is more extensive in their reach and threat level?
Similar is the case for any major religion, if they were ever to take up arms - although there are less chances of that NOW! In summary, religion + gun powder is literally an explosive combination!
how come moist are hindus????? they are communist....... being an AAP supporter(who belive in socialism) you should understand the difference between HINDUs and COMMUNISTs... you are very shrewd to dodge the blame of your own communist brothers on HINDUS......
You are all forgetting a very important aspect!
Not all of Maoists are even Hindus!!
There have been enough Muslim members among Maoist ranks - especially along Karnataka/Kerala border districts and Western Ghats. Similarly, I have no trouble believing that might well be some Christian members too!