What's new

Archaeologists confirm Indian civilization is 2000 years older than previou

ok so Ind has been around for millenia...how does that help improve the state of our beloved Bharat?
esp in corruption, and social issues?

whats the point of gloating over this?

Only the insecure and the coward will keep harping on his past glories to cover for his present inadequacies
 
ok so Ind has been around for millenia...how does that help improve the state of our beloved Bharat?
esp in corruption, and social issues?

whats the point of gloating over this?

Only the insecure and the coward will keep harping on his past glories to cover for his present inadequacies

Why does your location flag has Pakistan's flag when you are in UK.
 
ok so Ind has been around for millenia...how does that help improve the state of our beloved Bharat?
esp in corruption, and social issues?

whats the point of gloating over this?

Only the insecure and the coward will keep harping on his past glories to cover for his present inadequacies

Got scolded by history teacher,bro?:D
 
The River Saraswati and Saraswat Desh

The mythological river Saraswati (named after the Goddess Saraswati), flowed in Northern India in the present Punjab and Rajasthan region, from the Himalayas to the western sea near Dwaraka in Gujarat. The vedas were composed mostly on her banks. The Rig Veda describes this river as the holiest, the purest and the grandest of rivers. The river has long since dried out because it flowed from the receding glaciers of the great ice age 10,000 years ago. The land between the rivers Saraswati and Dristhadvathi (near the present day Kurukshetra) was called the Saraswat Desh which was the homeland of Saraswats who are considered the fore-fathers of Saraswats of Goa, Kanara and Kerala. There is a strong belief that in Prayag, Allahabad, flowing under-ground Saraswati joins Ganga and Yamuna to form the Triveni sangam. It is also believed that the river changed its course over the centuries. A part of this mighty river became the small river Ghaggar and one of the tributaries of the Saraswati became the Sutlej, now a tributary of the Indus. Today's scientific evidences have proven the existance of the Saraswati river.


http://www.gsbkerala.com/gsbhistory.htm

Aryans a mythical group has nothing to do with Vedas as described by British and Germans.

Some of these Saraswats also migrated to Ganga and Yamuna river banks.
 
The River Saraswati and Saraswat Desh

The mythological river Saraswati (named after the Goddess Saraswati), flowed in Northern India in the present Punjab and Rajasthan region, from the Himalayas to the western sea near Dwaraka in Gujarat. The vedas were composed mostly on her banks. The Rig Veda describes this river as the holiest, the purest and the grandest of rivers. The river has long since dried out because it flowed from the receding glaciers of the great ice age 10,000 years ago. The land between the rivers Saraswati and Dristhadvathi (near the present day Kurukshetra) was called the Saraswat Desh which was the homeland of Saraswats who are considered the fore-fathers of Saraswats of Goa, Kanara and Kerala. There is a strong belief that in Prayag, Allahabad, flowing under-ground Saraswati joins Ganga and Yamuna to form the Triveni sangam. It is also believed that the river changed its course over the centuries. A part of this mighty river became the small river Ghaggar and one of the tributaries of the Saraswati became the Sutlej, now a tributary of the Indus. Today's scientific evidences have proven the existance of the Saraswati river.


Saraswat history

Aryans a mythical group has nothing to do with Vedas as described by British and Germans.

Some of these Saraswats also migrated to Ganga and Yamuna river banks.

oh look, this ancient book that no one knows who wrote says that there was a river someplace so that disproved all modern scientists, linguist, archaeologists, etc. :rolleyes:

A British man by the name of Isac Newton described gravity, and a German man by the name of Albert Einstine described the theory of relativity.....but obvious they were quacks b/c the vedas say there was a river somewhere
 
I know another book that defies all such scientific logic.

Really?
Does that book also say that because there was a river somewhere, all modern science is null and void?
 
Really?
Does that book also say that because there was a river somewhere, all modern science is null and void?

yeah I believe it claims there was no evolution, that men turned into apes and all such fairy tales.

BTW the presence of Saraswathi river has been scientifically proved by modern science. That is the Ghagra-hakkar system which is currently dry.
 
yeah it claims there was no evolution, that horses flew and all such.

BTW the presence of Saraswathi river has been scientifically proved by modern science. That is the Ghagra-hakkar system which is currently dry.

Wow, sounds like a silly book almost as silly as the one with flying monkey warriors.

And if it has been proven then it would be easy for you to show the evidence. btw, no credible scientist will every in his life say that something is proven, they will always say "evidence shows"
But ignorant people who don't understand science....well to them everything is proven.

And the point was trying to make is, so what? what does the presence or absence of a river have anything to do with the Aryan invasion?
 
Wow, sounds like a silly book almost as silly as the one with flying monkey warriors.

Ofcourse the only difference is that they are not HOLY BOOKS, but jst EPICS like Illiad or Odyssey and people are not mandated to follow them.


And if it has been proven then it would be easy for you to show the evidence. btw, no credible scientist will every in his life say that something is proven, they will always say "evidence shows"
But ignorant people who don't understand science....well to them everything is proven.

And the point was trying to make is, so what? what does the presence or absence of a river have anything to do with the Aryan invasion?

Have anything better than semantics..something like refuting the evidence ?
 
Ofcourse the only difference is that they are not HOLY BOOKS, but jst EPICS like Illiad or Odyssey and people are not mandated to follow them.




Have anything better than semantics..something like refuting the evidence ?

If you say so


Semantics? You clearly don't know what that means otherwise you would not be using it in such a hilariously wrong manner. but then again you are the guy who thinks everything is proven. :lol:

And refute the evidence? for what? you haven't given anything or even made a real argument.
All you said was that there was a river mentioned in the Vedas and thus the Aryan invasion was proven to false.

I don't know how to refute silly......if I did I would become so rich so fast :cool:

For that you need to read up about the "silly" book.... because that "silly" book was the supposed basis for proving the theory of an "Aryan" invasion.

what are you on about?
The Aryan invasion does not hinge on the Vedas, there is plenty of evidence for it outside the vedas.

And no offence but I don't have time to learn Sanskrit and read an ancient book just to make a point against Internet HIndus.
 
Back
Top Bottom