karan.1970
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2010
- Messages
- 14,781
- Reaction score
- -20
- Country
- Location
No Karan...if we go by that logic then every damn thing politicians say is nothing but lip service...Consider this if India and Pak go for a war don't you think US will be neutral if not come all the way to support India(Long term interest)??? Don't you think that use of weapons by Pak can then lead to sanctions??? Anyways feel free to disagree because in the end only time will tell if this is lip service or not...
I go with his words as well...However that doesn't mean Indian string lobby presence in US is also doing the same....
Any sane person will choose that...and I know you are one...So no issues with that...However if we look into History Pakistan Army is known for taking bold but conceptually weak steps which are based on some fantasy assumptions....The moment Pakistan got her nukes test there comes the Kargil even though a bus Yatra was on to resolve issues......Their success in Sir Creek and India's debacle in 1962 lead them to 1965 war....So you never know...
Negative...IMO our border with China is peaceful and that's why insignificant...Try to fuel Tibet region with some support and see the real face of dragon...so comparing CHina border with Kashmir irritant is like comparing apples with peanuts...
No Buddy...You ar eonly partly right...India's presence in AF non-militarily cannot negate the fact that western border will be having killer machines...Again as i said 18 odd F16's won't be a big headache for us however if you are in a position to deny even peanuts to adversary then why not...We should at least try and this statement from congressman is a welcome step in that regard....
I dont have strong disagreements with your view. Am just aligned to a different priority in diplomacy..
I think you misunderstood my China comment. What I meant was that due to Chinese enormous growth, all its other problems have become more of irritants for it. And thats what we should aim for.....