The bridge
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2012
- Messages
- 142
- Reaction score
- 0
Thats not a valid excuse for not replacing the system.What grantees you had in 1947 that democracy in india wont end up in new dynastic rule who act as present day rajas maharajas and feudal.
I wonder if Akbar was a Phd holder that he came out to be such a good ruler.
I also feel aggrieved by the present day govt. Does that mean I should take up arms and fight till my demands are met? And while doing so, I also make other people also party to my struggle? Just because few of us have not been given our due, we take the whole nation to ransom.
WhY do you think the maoists of Nepal have given up their fight of over a decade and instead chose to join mainstream by contesting elections and forming a govt there. But even could their govt change the fate of the poor and under privileged. Today it is the largest party in Nepal. but who has benefited except a few in the Govt. The common man is still a common man. He still bows to the rulers and waiting for the miracle promised by the Maoists. A Hitler on the other hand would have been better choice.
A Hitler