Levina
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2013
- Messages
- 15,278
- Reaction score
- 59
- Country
- Location
I so wish you could have read my complete post where I gave the logic and justification for my views.
I dont mind rehashing all the same. Two direct contradictions -
Point 1
Survival of fittest does not take "Karma backed by Dharma" which means action backed by religious morals.
Survival of fittest is kill or be killed. No Dharma in it.
Point 2
Survival of fittest is based on extinction. You kill someone because if you dont then your life is over
Gita says Soul is immortal, so death is irrelevant. So just do your Karma and dont worry about death.
TLDR - Death is the driving force for survival of fittest. One wants to live at all costs, Dharma be damned. In Gita Death is irrelevant and Karma is the driving force
Regards
P.S. Gita is not usually classified as mythology though the overarching saga of Mahabharat is. Gita is often independently considered as mystic philosophy. Just nitpicking
I don't like getting lectured at midnight ...
Survival of fittest is kill or be killed. No Dharma in it.
Dharma- is the eternal law of cosmos.
Eternal law= survival of the fittest.
And it is not what you have interpreted it to be...
Survival of fittest does not take "Karma backed by Dharma" which means action backed by religious morals
******
Gita says Soul is immortal, so death is irrelevant.
Yes.
True that.So just do your Karma and dont worry about death.
So what's your karma as a King?
To look after your kingdom?
Make sure no enemy attacks it?
Maintain peace???
That's exactly what Krishna asked Arjuna to do- to kill Kauravas and ensure that his kingdom was safe.
Do you get the drift of it?