Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't think so. Arabs were late to recognize BD due to their closeness with Pakistan. Israel recognized BD early. We should had done the same. There wouldn't had been much public uproar back then. Initially relation with Arabs may had been cold but eventually they would had fallen in line. But now establishing relation with Israel will cause huge uproar among public.That would have been diplomatic suicide.
Azerbaijan also have a very warm relation with Israel. There are many ways the situation between Israel and Palestine may evolve in the future. Forming our strategy based on this is perhaps not the best option. I don't think Israel ever harmed Bangladesh. Rationally speaking there is no point not having diplomatic relation with them. Unless you want to carry the baggage of Arabs. But sadly this is what we want.What Turkey did was wrong.Egypt and Jordan had no other choice.Their diplomatic relation with Israel is very cold.No other muslim countries should establish or normalize relation with Israel in it's current form. Only after Israel end it's occupation of the land seized in 1967 war and after establishing a sovereign Palestinian state in West Bank and Gaza,then all Muslim countries including Bangladesh should establish relation with Israel, not before.
Bangladesh should've established diplomatic ties with Israel right after independence. But now it's too late.
@Solomon2
Bhai, you think too much unrealistic things...Don't think so. Arabs were late to recognize BD due to their closeness with Pakistan. Israel recognized BD early. We should had done the same. There wouldn't had been much public uproar back then. Initially relation with Arabs may had been cold but eventually they would had fallen in line. But now establishing relation with Israel will cause huge uproar among public.
No it has nothing to do with that. Israel's defence exports has nothing to do with the tiny trade between bengladesh and Israel. They are not mutually exclusive.does this ring the bell ? lol
That would have drawn the ire of your islamists in bengladesh, thus leading to even more instability for bengladesh. Since I'm sure almost every bengladeshi Muslim is against recognising Israel, so i think bengladesh government was right not to recognise them. Stakes were too high for them. Same with Pakistan.Don't think so. Arabs were late to recognize BD due to their closeness with Pakistan. Israel recognized BD early. We should had done the same. There wouldn't had been much public uproar back then. Initially relation with Arabs may had been cold but eventually they would had fallen in line. But now establishing relation with Israel will cause huge uproar among public.
I don't know, I've never heard of this French magazine.I didn't expected this.Good for Israeli civil society.
@Solomon2
That's it throw the anti semantic card. So typical do the Zionist. You could have said regardless Israel is doing good or it's position with respect to genocide which the jews themselves suffered.....But noooo you want the money can't, let go of that and hence throw the anti genetic card. True Jewish Zionist racist facistI don't know, I've never heard of this French magazine.
Al-Jazeera English illustrates Myanmar's arms imports with this graphic:
So it's apparent the disproportional emphasis on Israeli arms exports to Burma is a matter of antisemitism - and won't do a thing to help the people oppressed by the Myanmar army.
Well, we know Israel exports very little amount of weapons to burma compared others. But, you guys exported sophisticated high tech weapons and training to burma.I don't know, I've never heard of this French magazine.
Al-Jazeera English illustrates Myanmar's arms imports with this graphic:
So it's apparent the disproportional emphasis on Israeli arms exports to Burma is a matter of antisemitism - and won't do a thing to help the people oppressed by the Myanmar army.
You do not dispute my argument, just that I made it.That's it throw the anti semantic card. So typical do the Zionist.
One, it's not clear if the report about Israel stopping arms exports is true and that's what I was asked my opinion of. So this criticism of yours is unjustified. That said -...You could have said regardless Israel is doing good or it's position with respect to genocide which the jews themselves suffered...you want the money can't, let go -
How do you arrive at that judgment? You see how much more other countries have supplied Burma. Don't you think they provided training in proportion to that?Well, we know Israel exports very little amount of weapons to burma compared others. But, you guys exported sophisticated high tech weapons and training to burma. So, you helped them more than others...
I agree. It would have been an affirmation that the right to self-determination was a moral stance of the new nation of Bangladesh, not just a narrow ethnic one.Israel recognized BD early. We should had done the same. There wouldn't had been much public uproar back then.
Oooh, I want to hear the explanation for this one.Do you even know how much of our people became middle class from lower class just because of our No friendship with Israel policy?
Bangladesh should've established diplomatic ties with Israel right after independence. But now it's too late.
@Solomon2
Turkey(yeah the country everyone on PDF looks up to), Jordan, Egypt has diplomatic relation with Israel. Israel recognized BD, BD should had done the same. But BD always have valued relations with Arabs more. So diplomatic relation was not established. Now this issue has become a political one. Any govt that recognize Israel will shoot itself on the foot.
Palestinians fought against the Ottomans for the Brits. After British took Palestine the Arabs started to sell lands to Jews. Israel was created by British mandate. Palestinians have a lot to blame on their ancestors than evil Jews for their condition.
Don't think so. Arabs were late to recognize BD due to their closeness with Pakistan. Israel recognized BD early. We should had done the same. There wouldn't had been much public uproar back then. Initially relation with Arabs may had been cold but eventually they would had fallen in line. But now establishing relation with Israel will cause huge uproar among public.
Azerbaijan also have a very warm relation with Israel. There are many ways the situation between Israel and Palestine may evolve in the future. Forming our strategy based on this is perhaps not the best option. I don't think Israel ever harmed Bangladesh. Rationally speaking there is no point not having diplomatic relation with them. Unless you want to carry the baggage of Arabs. But sadly this is what we want.
Bhai, you think too much unrealistic things...
Do you even know how much of our people became middle class from lower class just because of our No friendship with Israel policy?
Recognising Israel will be diplomatic and economic suicide. We will be the last country to recognise Israel.
Think before you speak. Don't be like Indians.
(Do you think any political party and person in Bangladesh got guts to speak about recognising Israel?)
You know its bad when even a apartheid israel refuses to work with you
Myanmar do not need India to ward off the international pressure. They got one of the P-5 with a veto.So when will India fall in line and cut relations with Myanmar?
Myanmar do not need India to ward off the international pressure. They got one of the P-5 with a veto.
Please explain a reason why we should cut the relationship with Myanmar then later risk the insurgency in NE(Again). While we can issue 'concerned' statements, send some food, offer to mediate. That makes everyone happy.
You know what's really bad - despite that, Pakistan is fully willing to sell JF-17 to Myanmar. If it was up to me we would refuse to deal with them until they stopped the violence against the Rohingya. If the Chinese wish to sell it to them, they are welcome to, but we should have no involvement.
It's no surprise to be shamed by Israel in the fields of science or technology, but ethics and morality - that's an eye opening low.
Looks like everyone wants my opinion on Modi as a 'Muslim'. Which I don't think is relevant on the issue. Because you can't expect any different attitude from congress either. The same congress was ruling when anti Bangladeshi riot happened in Assam. It has partly to do with the beliefs in different offices such as RAW, IB, FO, diplomatic offices that BD is partly responsible for the plight.What do you as a Muslim think about the anti-Muslim bigot Modi being the only leader to visit Myanmar during the height of the ethnic cleansing and publicly support the vicious regime's treatment of the Rohingyas?
Looks like everyone wants my opinion on Modi as a 'Muslim'. Which I don't think is relevant on the issue. Because you can't expect any different attitude from congress either. The same congress was ruling when anti Bangladeshi riot happened in Assam. It has partly to do with the beliefs in different offices such as RAW, IB, FO, diplomatic offices that BD is partly responsible for the plight.
Just put Sonia Gandhi in place of Modi. She'll go to MM, make a loose concern over the issue, then your'll still be pissed off by the views and comments. Should I say, it's not the politicians it's the bureaucracy that calls the shot in FO (to a great extend). And a larger section in the bureaucracy still believes BD is resonsible for the plight of Rohingya minority. They have the case of our own states to compare to.
Now, I don't know what happens between India-Myanmar behind closed door, but I know you are getting a wind of it.
This quite interesting and surprising. Why should Israel deprive its companies from making money by stop selling weapons to Myanmar while other Islamic countries like pakistan are selling their top range weapons to Myanmar?
It's like expecting China (Myanmars top weapon supplier and diplomatic backer) to stop selling weapons to Myanmar just because of some Rohingyas.
This crisis doesn't concern/affect Israel at all, so I fail to see why they would stop cooperating with a partner for no good reason whatsoever. Or maybe it was due to U. S pressure or something. This is interesting to see though. Let's see how things play out in future.