What's new

America’s interventions in Bangladesh’s politics hurt the interests of India and regional peace

BanglaBhoot

RETIRED TTA
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Messages
8,839
Reaction score
5
Country
France
Location
France
None is in doubt that the US is keen on a regime change in Dhaka and wants the BNP to replace the Awami League in power. Mozena has made no secret of that so far. Many suspect the US may find Khaleda Zia willing to offer the US a base in the Bay of Bengal, which Hasina never will. Neither will India.” Subir Bhaumik


For more on the historical animosity between India and the United States over Bangladesh read The India Doctrine –


The India Doctrine (1947-2007) | Mohammad Munshi - Academia.edu


America’s interventions in Bangladesh’s politics hurt the interests of India and regional peace


Subir Bhaumik


Economic Times - 24 March, 2014


In Bangladesh, the US is back to rattling the present government headed by Sheikh Hasina. Subdued for a while after India, China and Russia joined hands to support the re-elected Sheikh Hasina government, the US is reminding Dhaka it is not business as usual after the January 5 polls.


US ambassador in Dhaka Dan Mozena has met Opposition BNP chief Khaleda Zia several times and told the media that the US supports the Bangladesh people in their quest for democracy.

Mozena insisted on an immediate dialogue on "how to hold elections fairly" to be followed by fresh polls that are "credible and inclusive". Hasina's foreign policy adviser Gowher Rizvi has described these calls for fresh elections as destabilising the situation that the January 5 polls help stabilise. Mozena's fusillade coincided with a Senate foreign relations hearing on Bangladesh, on the day Mozena met Khaleda Zia. It was titled Prospects for Democratic Reconciliation and Workers' Rights in Bangladesh.


Senior US labour department officials told the committee that Bangladesh has not done enough to improve labour rights and safety standards — so Washington should hold back on resuming the Generalised System of Preferences for 5,000 Bangladesh products that was cancelled in June last year after 1,100 ready-made garment factory workers died in the illfated Rana Plaza collapse.


Eric Biel, the acting associate deputy undersecretary at the US labour department, admitted that there were indications of progress in some areas of the US action plan for the Bangladesh garment industry — but much more needed to be done, specially in allowing workers to form unions.


Senator Robert Menendez, who heads the Senate committee, said only around 100 unions have registered so far with only 40,000 workers in its fold, of the total three million garment industry workers in the country. He said factory owners, like government, needed to appreciate that "it was difficult to sell clothing if it's on the blood of the workers". And Menendez was quick to warn, "Any progress we make on labour issues is taking place in a very tenuous political environment."


Hurting the Poor Millions


The Senate hearing took to task the Hasina government for ousting Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus as managing director of the Grameen Bank. One senator described it as a "crass political move to punish him in some way and sadly to punish millions of people who depend on that bank to survive". US assistant secretary of state for south and central Asia Nisha Biswal echoed that sentiment saying Yunus' ouster was a matter of "deep shame".


Around the same time, the US-based IRI released findings of its public opinion poll in Bangladesh, that suggested most Bangladeshis were unsure of their future on account of "lack of political stability". In the latest survey, 59% said the country was headed in the wrong direction, compared to only 35% who reported they felt the country was headed in the right direction.


In particular, a majority are also pessimistic about the economy, with 60% saying they believed it would get worse in the year ahead. The numbers were even higher concerning the issue of violence, as 71% said they believed it would worsen in the upcoming year.


This survey was funded by the United States Agency for International Development and the UK's Department for International Development. So, though the US State Department says it will work with the Hasina-led government and not cut back on development assistance, it is clear Washington will push Dhaka very hard for fresh elections.


None is in doubt that the US is keen on a regime change in Dhaka and wants the BNP to replace the Awami League in power. Mozena has made no secret of that so far. Many suspect the US may find Khaleda Zia willing to offer the US a base in the Bay of Bengal, which Hasina never will. Neither will India.


Surrounded!


When the US pushes for fresh elections in Bangladesh and plays the Generalised System of Preferences card to threaten its exports, it is likely to find support from the EU and the Commonwealth.

The pressure will increase if the BNP, which boycotted the parliament elections, does well in the Upa-zilla polls that are now taking place in several phases.


Dhaka Dialling Delhi


This is when India is busy with its parliament elections. If it ends in a fractured mandate and there's a weak government in Delhi, India will be uncertain about facing US pressures in the neighbourhood.

West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee's hostility towards the present regime in Dhaka makes the scene more complicated and raises questions on Delhi's policy towards the Hasina government if Banerjee were to become an important factor in a ruling coalition that may be clubbed together after the polls. Hasina has gone out of her way to address India's security and connectivity concerns in the east during her last five years in power. Leaving her to face the inevitable US wrath would do India no good.


America’s interventions in Bangladesh’s politics hurt the interests of India and regional peace - Page2 - The Economic Times
 
I don't understand this........Muslim majority countries first Invite America......then they start complaining when the 'mericans start killing them.....
America wants to replace moderate BAL with extremist BNP so that they can start 'droning' Bangladesh(in the name of 'war-on-terror') once these extremists show their true colour............just a 'foot-hold gaining' tactics, if you ask me......
 
Last edited:
I don't understand this........Muslim majority countries first Invite America......then they start complaining when the 'mericans start killing them.....
America wants to replace moderate BAL with extremist BNP so that they can start 'droning' Bangladesh(in the name of 'war-on-terror') once these extremists show their true colour............just a 'foot-hold' gaining tactics, if you ask me......

:lol: you just nailed all hard work of munshi....
 
:lol: you just nailed all hard work of munshi....

....old(and overused) American tactics......first they support the bad guys, then they fight the bad guys.....thereby fulfilling their desire of bossing around the world for their own interest...
 
Last edited:
Everyone knows that a US naval base in Bay of Bengal will be used against China, yet the BNP-Jamaatis are bending over backwards just to get back into power.

@Chinese-Dragon your thoughts on this mate?
 
Everyone knows that a US naval base in Bay of Bengal will be used against China, yet the BNP-Jamaatis are bending over backwards just to get back into power.

@Chinese-Dragon your thoughts on this mate?

Any country, anywhere in the world, will be surrounded by American military bases anyway. :lol:

China and Russia are of course the two main targets for containment.

Bangladesh should do what is in their best interests. Just be careful when it comes to America in particular, is all I would say.
 
Any country, anywhere in the world, will be surrounded by American military bases anyway. :lol:

China and Russia are of course the two main targets for containment.

Bangladesh should do what is in their best interests. Just be careful when it comes to America in particular, is all I would say.

Bangladesh first and foremost necessity is to preserve Bangladesh sovereignty and independence from indian attack. Now, if Bangladeshis need help from US or Chinese or both, we should be seeking that. Lately though, indians tried to poison Chinese understanding by propagating a lie that Bangladesh will be used against China by US. But that indian lie is to save indian stooges (Awami League regime) which is not only undermining Bangladesh sovereignty, but also undermining Chinese and US interest in Bangladesh.

Furthermore, india, by undermining Bangladesh sovereignty and keeping indian subservient regime only doing long term damage to Chinese interest in disputed area around Tibet. If China fall for indian lie, it will only enable india to use Bangladesh at staging ground and corridor, in future conflict against China.

China also should not fooled by increasing purchase of military equipments by indian subservient current Bangladesh regime. When indian end game is to use Bangladesh defense force as auxiliary in future conflict against China, such purchase is just india orchestrated deception.

Bangladesh played and will play moderation role when it comes to China and US interests. For Chinese they should not forget, it was Bangladeshi origin (then) Pakistani diplomat who played crucial role in establishing diplomatic relation between China and United States. In Bangladesh, for China and US, it is not zero some game as indians are lying to their teeth. Perhaps, Chinese PM (to be more specific) and foreign ministry needs some soul searching before falling for indian lie.
 
Last edited:
Why is everyone thinking that India is the good guy here. It always plays the saint but is actually the devil.
 
...contrary to what the Jamaatis would like to believe, their collective asses will burn if they either choose America or China.....they're able to breathe in Bangladesh since there is a pro-India govt. there......
 
...contrary to what the Jamaatis would like to believe, their collective asses will burn if they either choose America or China.....they're able to breathe in Bangladesh since there is a pro-India govt. there......
actully i want US to have base there so they get their @ss spanked it would be awsome:dance3::dance3::dance3:
 
I don't think India or China will allow BD to lease a base to the US in our backyard. Most importantly, I dont see any use of such a base :sarcastic:. What strategic value will it provide?
 
actully i want US to have base there so they get their @ss spanked it would be awsome:dance3::dance3::dance3:
Imagine Jamaatis running towards caves to hide from American drones.....Oh wait! there are no caves in Bangladesh...:woot::sarcastic:
 
I don't think India or China will allow BD to lease a base to the US in our backyard. Most importantly, I dont see any use of such a base :sarcastic:. What strategic value will it provide?

Ability to bomb India ... 8-)

Imagine Jamaatis running towards caves to hide from American drones.....Oh wait! there are no caves in Bangladesh...:woot::sarcastic:

It will be Indian dalals running into the jungles and forests ....
 
Back
Top Bottom