What's new

ALL Xinjiang related issues e.g. uyghur people, development, videos etc, In here please.

An Independent East Turkestan will be bad for Pakistan

  • Yes

    Votes: 64 53.8%
  • No

    Votes: 55 46.2%

  • Total voters
    119
any random Youtuber cannot be considered credible source of information
But you still haven't answer me on which source you believe is reliable, more reliable than foreign expats who really live in China for years.
 
oh so CIA robots can no longer accept any facts.

You said I was a CCP robot. Because you believe that the CCP will not sanction Pakistan?

Come on, robot. Do you want China and the US to sanction Pakistan together? WOW. Are you so brave?

Who do you think you are? Do you forget how failed your country is when you read too much western news?
hey. robot. I'm not looking down on you. The CCP doesn't even need to sanction you. In fact, the CCP only needs to be neutral in the UN....... Other countries will make Pakistan desperate. Lolllllllllllllllllllll....

Listen, what's the sound "bomb, bomb, bomb". hahahahahahaha
Woah! that's a major bug in this CCP bot
 
But you still haven't answer me on which source you believe is reliable, more reliable than foreign expats who really live in China for years.

in Western standards we have something called standards, in China no such thing , only state sponsored propaganda

when something happens we have independent media with independent judiciary system who can verify claims

I know you cant understand the concept, you were not born in this type of open system, since you are obviously being monitored by Chinese authorities , so I will leave it to you to work it out

a twitter account or youtube is not credible source of information

inviting independent media organisation from outside with unrestricted access to all site would constitutes a credible source, with no Chinese minders and police
 
in Western standards we have something called standards, in China no such thing , only state sponsored propaganda

when something happens we have independent media with independent judiciary system who can verify claims

I know you cant understand the concept, you were not born in this type of open system, since you are obviously being monitored by Chinese authorities , so I will leave it to you to work it out

a twitter account or youtube is not credible source of information

inviting independent media organisation from outside with unrestricted access to all site would constitutes a credible source, with no Chinese minders and police

We know and witnessed your standard first hand so many times in the history, we don't need you to specify it this much.
BN-HS085_C3_M_20150402104744.jpg
 
in Western standards we have something called standards

Standards? Like what West displayed in Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine, and now in Kashmir?

So only Western sources are credible. You sir are fully brainwashed.
Showing Chinese ID cards on social media become a popular new trend in Xinjiang in support of Xinjiang and China amid western Xinjiang smearing campaign



Ma sha Allah. We will prevent the terrorism in Xinjiang and help support genuine peace and tranquility in the region. We don't want another Syria, Yemen, or Libya where Muslims are slaughtered for the West's designs.
 
At least he got honest and changed his flags to the UK. More Fakeistanis should do the same.

Many of these diaspora kids are brainwashed by Muslim Brotherhood or Daesh. They don't know the reality. You can check yourself.

Imagine gay Daeshis, this is the world we live in.

I think PDF should have a strong policy against support for terrorism.
 
Who are "we"?

Me & Aziqbal.......duh.
Ma sha Allah. We will prevent the terrorism in Xinjiang and help support genuine peace and tranquility in the region. We don't want another Syria, Yemen, or Libya where Muslims are slaughtered for the West's designs.

No, East Turkestan will be free again. Jihad Fi Sabilillah. :D


Btw, Youtube is banned in China....so all those accounts are aimed at foreign audiences.....clearly cheap propaganda! :lol:
 
We know and witnessed your standard first hand so many times in the history, we don't need you to specify it this much.
BN-HS085_C3_M_20150402104744.jpg

dont worry about us, worry for yourself

and pointing to others wrongs doesnt make your argument right what a low intellect individual you are
 
dont worry about us, worry for yourself

and pointing to others wrongs doesnt make your argument right what a low intellect individual you are

You: China did this and that...

Wumao: Wait a sec....the US does the same! So we can do it to!

:lol:
 
The evidence is clear: a genocide against the Uighurs is in progress. Britain must not put trade before human rights
Fri 26 Mar 2021 15.40 GMTLast modified on Fri 26 Mar 2021 17.21 GMT



Guards at a ‘vocational skills education centre’ for Uighur people in Huocheng County, Xinjiang, 2018.uighur-protests-east-turkmenistan-1172709956.jpg
Guards at a ‘vocational skills education centre’ for Uighur people in Huocheng County, Xinjiang, 2018. Photograph: Thomas Peter/Reuters

It came as no surprise to me that I have been included on the list of those sanctioned by the Chinese government for vocal criticisms of the human rights abuses towards Uighur Muslims in Xinjiang province. China is not big on freedom of speech.
In the “tit-for-tat game that is part of foreign relations, this action is of little consequence. On a personal level, I will be sad not to visit China again, as I have great admiration for many Chinese academics and human rights advocates with whom I have had contact. However, I have no assets to freeze, no investments and no secret property, and my legal work seeking to protect human rights will go on as before.
As a lawyer, my position on China’s conduct is evidence-based. We have all seen the clear aggression against the pro-democracy movement in Hong Kong. I fear for close lawyer friends there, such as Martin Lee and Margaret Ng, who are in peril because of their courageous protection of the rule of law.




Read more
On the egregious crimes against the Uighur, I have heard directly the testimonies of those who have suffered, especially exiled women who have been sexually abused and raped, sterilised or forced to terminate pregnancies. Some have been separated from children, who are sent to remand homes to be deracinated – denied their religion and culture. I have seen the aerial photographs showing the destruction of mosques and burial grounds. I have heard from well-connected academics of forced labour, of the large numbers held in re-education camps and the coerced movement of villagers to work in other parts of China.
International lawyers are currently debating whether the available evidence amounts to genocide. But to my mind the evidential pointers are clear: a genocide is indeed in progress. The genocide convention requires signatory nations in order to prevent genocide, not to merely wring our hands about it when it is over.
China is as a dominant power in our world. It is taking a lead on climate change, which is to be admired. And its belt-and-road policy has seen it offer strong infrastructure assistance to developing countries in parts of Asia, Africa and elsewhere. The downside of this strategic support is that the indebtedness of less powerful countries is reflected in the support China is able to enjoy at the UN.
Because of its economic muscle, China is able to go about its business in the world untroubled by the consequences of its crimes. The desire for good trading relations is a great silencer, and even majority-Muslim nations have often failed to denounce what is happening to their co-religionists in Xinjiang. I do not want to see a return to cold war politics, but the consensus that was created after the second world war around a rules-based order is now under constant threat. The values that informed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and all the subsequent international conventions are being trashed.
China has detained my young children. I don't know if I'll ever see them again
Mihriban Kader


Read more

When challenged, the UK government says that only a designated courtshould decide whether China is committing genocide. What it means by this is that nations against which such an allegation is made normally go before the international court of justice. Individuals who have authored such crimes are brought before the international criminal court.
Indeed it is right that courts are the best place for such serious determinations. But in this instance, it is a catch-22: China entered a “reservation” with regard to the jurisdiction of the international court of justice, which means it will not accept its authority on matters such as genocide. As for the international criminal court, China was not a signatory of the Rome statute which created that court.
That leaves us with no international court to determine the issue, which is why the Liberal peer David Alton and I pushed hard in the House of Lords for the creation of a procedure that would have enabled the English high court to make a determination on whether the evidence reached the threshold for genocide.
Since that effort was defeated, we are pressing for the creation of a House of Lords committee of former senior judges to conduct such an assessment of the evidence on behalf of government.
This comes, of course, just as the leaders of “global Britain” eye opportunities for new trade negotiations. But there should be no letup in shaming China for what is happening, and the UK should be clear and forceful. Human rights must come before trade.
  • Helena Kennedy QC is a Labour peer



... we have a small favour to ask. Through these turbulent and challenging times, millions rely on the Guardian for independent journalism that stands for truth and integrity. Readers chose to support us financially more than 1.5 million times in 2020, joining existing supporters in 180 countries.

With your help, we will continue to provide high-impact reporting that can counter misinformation and offer an authoritative, trustworthy source of news for everyone. With no shareholders or billionaire owner, we set our own agenda and provide truth-seeking journalism that’s free from commercial and political influence. When it’s never mattered more, we can investigate and challenge without fear or favour.

Unlike many others, we have maintained our choice: to keep Guardian journalism open for all readers, regardless of where they live or what they can afford to pay. We do this because we believe in information equality, where everyone deserves to read accurate news and thoughtful analysis. Greater numbers of people are staying well-informed on world events, and being inspired to take meaningful action.

We aim to offer readers a comprehensive, international perspective on critical events shaping our world – from the Black Lives Matter movement, to the new American administration, Brexit, and the world's slow emergence from a global pandemic. We are committed to upholding our reputation for urgent, powerful reporting on the climate emergency, and made the decision to reject advertising from fossil fuel companies, divest from the oil and gas industries, and set a course to achieve net zero emissions by 2030.
 
hey. robot. I'm not looking down on you. The CCP doesn't even need to sanction you. In fact, the CCP only needs to be neutral in the UN....... Other countries will make Pakistan desperate. Lolllllllllllllllllllll....

Listen, what's the sound "bomb, bomb, bomb". hahahahahahaha

7 countries are sending Carriers + warships to South China Sea

wait till the summer 2021 more fun is coming, enjoy
 
Back
Top Bottom