Listen I did not mention Al-qaeda. I know that is not an Indian bogey. I only pointed out the names of organization about whom i credibly know.
And there is nothing to be offended, this is the prime role of spy agencies. for instance, tell me whom did u blame for Khalistan Movement or other separatists movements. ISI !!!. Why??? So please try to understand what i mean. I agree they use mostly our people for this.
Tell me if Orions were detroyed or SABs were damaged, who is the biggest beneficiary. BLA, TTP??? No, of course it is India, this is what I mean t sAY
I think you meant to quote the previous post of mine.
Yes you are right that spy agencies do try to assist the enemy of their enemies. But to accuse a country of such things, you ought to bring some credible proof. I'm not denying the possibility that India may be covertly providing assistance, but until it is proven...
Now let me make one distinction - it is one thing to say that India may be assisting TTP or BLA, but many Pakistanis here claim that those are both Indian creations. That claim stretches credibility. For one thing, India has ZERO ideological affinity to taliban or similar groups. In fact, long before 9/11, India was aiding the Northern alliance fighters, even having set up a field hospital to treat their wounded fighters. At that time, Pakistan was assisting the taliban, including direct military assistance by its special forces. Now ask yourself, which country's population is more likely to join the ranks of taliban? Also, would such a large organisation as the TTP secretly owe allegiance to India, given what we know of their ideology? I suppose you could make up a theory that they are all secretly India lovers hell bent on destroying Pakistan, and that their cadre and leaders are not islamists, but secret India lovers. I just don't see how anybody could buy that, unless you substantiate it.
To keep it short - yes, I believe that it is possible that India or RAW could be aiding anti Pak militants to an extent - but I will not assert that as truth unless proven. And, whether or not the former is true, the pretense of some Pakistanis that it is all an Indian creation is something I cannot subscribe to.
About the former insurgencies in Kashmir and Punjab - Pakistan ideologically supported and continues to support separatism in Kashmir, and by now it is well established that Pakistan has training camps for such militants, and that many Pakistanis (even non Kashmiris) join groups like LeT. As for Punjab - now this is where there is a similarity to the present situation. Khalistani militants got arms and ammunition from Pakistan, they themselves admit that. However,
I will not pretend that the whole Khalistan movement was a Pakistani creation. No, that happened due to some very bad policies by the govt of India. Pakistan only aided them, but did not create them. Many Pakistanis here, as well as you in your post that I responded to, suggest that the whole TTP thing is an Indian creation. It is not - it happened due to the religious radicalization across Pakistan, the dangerous mixing of religion and politics, and also due to Pak's role in Afghanistan since a long time. You cannot even blame the govt entirely - your people are also very responsible. It is better to admit this fact, than to keep pretending that it is all due to India.
About the orions and AEWACs - I have written before on why it need not have been India that instigated it. Again, I'm not denying the possibility - but Pakistanis think that just because those two assets are useful only against India, it was India that destroyed them. That's a mistake. The TTP are waging unconventional warfare, and it is also a war of attrition from them against the Pak state. Anything that degrades Pak's military capacity or hurts economically, benefits them. To replace those damaged assets, Pak would have to spend millions of dollars. That is millions of dollars that cannot be used to fight the TTP. It is that simple - hit the enemy economically. Destroying the most valuable possessions of the enemy is what any bunch of fighters would do, especially unconventional ones. Maybe the most used weapon against TTP are rifles - but can they go about destroying all the rifles in the Pak military? Doesn't it make more sense to destroy something more expensive, the end result being the same - a degradation of the enemy's war machine. That is why fighters don't target just whatever is used against them.
