Ultima Thule
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2012
- Messages
- 16,725
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
For baseless reasons @undertakerwwefanI worship Russia.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For baseless reasons @undertakerwwefanI worship Russia.
For retard reasons @undertakerwwefanI'm a BIG Russia worshipper.
yeah i know that @undertakerwwefan But RAFALE has An advantages over MIG29K in Almost every thing like range, payloads, better radar+avionics, better sensor fusion, better T/W ratio, Better wing loading etc etc @undertakerwwefan
Rafale:
+ Lower RCS
+ More fuel
+ More modern avionics
+ Targeting pods
MiG-35
+ higher speed
It does not have RAM does not have AESA does not have pods. All just plans.MiG-29 K has RAM. Very small RCS. I doubt Rafale has smaller RCS.
The radar signature of the aircraft is reduced by four to five times over the basic MiG-29.
https://www.naval-technology.com/projects/mig-29k-carrier-based-multirole-fighter-aircraft/
MiG-29 K can be easily upgraded with the modular Zhuk A AESA and the T220 EOT pod.
Go read the the article you about RAFALE/MIG-29K in your first post you stupid @undertakerwwefanProof?
It does not have RAM does not have AESA does not have pods. All just plans.
MIG-29K has the weaker engine for its size hence low T/W ratio @undertakerwwefan , in certain areas like air intake, wing leading edges, horizontal/vertical tails but RAFALE is also mostly using RAM/composite materials for all over RAFALE fuselage as compare to Mig-29K @undertakerwwefanMiG-29 K has RAM. Very small RCS. I doubt Rafale has smaller RCS.
The radar signature of the aircraft is reduced by four to five times over the basic MiG-29.
https://www.naval-technology.com/projects/mig-29k-carrier-based-multirole-fighter-aircraft/
MiG-29 K can be easily upgraded with the modular Zhuk A AESA and the T220 EOT pod.
MIG-29K has the weaker engine for its size hence low T/W ratio @undertakerwwefan , in certain areas like air intake, wing leading edges, horizontal/vertical tails but RAFALE is also mostly using RAM/composite materials for all over RAFALE fuselage as compare to Mig-29K @undertakerwwefan
That show you have 4 year old shit brain @undertakerwwefan then why offering MIG-29K for export @undertakerwwefanRafale's AESA has no advantage over it.
That show you have 4 year old shit brain @undertakerwwefan then why offering MIG-29K for export @undertakerwwefan
go retard worship and lick Russian military tech senselessly @undertakerwwefan Both are almost Same from your OP articles @undertakerwwefanMiG-29 K empty weight 11,000 kg.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan_MiG-29K
Rafale empty weight 10,300 kg 2 seat air force version.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dassault_Rafale
Not much difference. However, Rafale engine is only 16,860 lb power compared to MiG-29 K engine 19,800 lb power.
So MiG-29 K has better T/W ratio.
Sorry my mistake, i am asking that question to you that why they are offering MIG-29K with AESA, if MIG-29K mechanical radar is on par with RAFALE AESA you brain shit @undertakerwwefanSame question can be asked. Why offer Rafale for export? Why only 5 countries in the world can make planes? Why the other countries can't make planes have to buy?
Sorry my mistake, i am asking that question to you that why they are offering MIG-29K with AESA, if MIG-29K mechanical radar is on par with RAFALE AESA you brain shit @undertakerwwefan
And russian developed AESA lot later than west/US instead they master in developing PESA which is inferior to AESA. First AESA of the world was developed by USA for UAE F-16 blk60 in early 2000 and Japanese F-2 in mid 90's and F-22 radar development completed in late 90's so they have the experience to build far more better AESA than russian, Russian are just a beginner in the development of AESA @undertakerwwefanThat's like saying why F-18 E got APG-79 which is the AESA version of APG-73. Because it is evolution. Same capability. But easier servicing.