What's new

Air Commodore (R) Kaiser Tufail explains the Su-35S offer.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kompromat

ADMINISTRATOR
Joined
May 3, 2009
Messages
40,366
Reaction score
416
Country
Pakistan
Location
Australia
Air Commodore (R) Kaiser Tufail explains the Su-35S offer to defensenews.com

su35.jpg

"There is a possible need for something in this class on two accounts: diversification and to support naval operations. The Su-35 "being a twin-engined aircraft with vast range (and endurance), it would help us to have a significant and potent presence in the Arabian Sea, something that the puny, aging Mirage squadron is ill-suited for (as is the JF-17 from the range point of view)," he said. "Given the changing geo-politics and the Chinese investment whose trade terminus is Gwadar, there is definitely going to be a need for a long-range fighter. So essentially, I see it as a guarantor of maritime security as far as the airspace is concerned.

"All of this may sound like a sudden switch from continental strategy to a maritime one, but it is high time that we paid serious attention to this aspect in the fast changing geopolitical scenario. Pakistan's air power over the Arabian Sea already received a boost this month when No. 2 'Minhas' Squadron based in Karachi was re-equipped September 6 with the JF-17 Block II after surrendering its Chengdu F-7P fighters.

The re-equipment of [No. 2 'Minhas' Squadron] was due as they had the oldest lot of F-7s. The JF-17 was the obvious replacement. The Mirage-5PA2/3 is still a capable aircraft, though long in the tooth by now. Most likely, the replacement of these Mirages would have a maritime role, so it could be a couple of years before we see a newer capability. He said Whether that replacement is the Su-35, however, remains to be seen."

Defence News
 
Air Commodore (R) Kaiser Tufail explains the Su-35S offer to defensenews.com

View attachment 256367
"There is a possible need for something in this class on two accounts: diversification and to support naval operations. The Su-35 "being a twin-engined aircraft with vast range (and endurance), it would help us to have a significant and potent presence in the Arabian Sea, something that the puny, aging Mirage squadron is ill-suited for (as is the JF-17 from the range point of view)," he said. "Given the changing geo-politics and the Chinese investment whose trade terminus is Gwadar, there is definitely going to be a need for a long-range fighter. So essentially, I see it as a guarantor of maritime security as far as the airspace is concerned.

"All of this may sound like a sudden switch from continental strategy to a maritime one, but it is high time that we paid serious attention to this aspect in the fast changing geopolitical scenario. Pakistan's air power over the Arabian Sea already received a boost this month when No. 2 'Minhas' Squadron based in Karachi was re-equipped September 6 with the JF-17 Block II after surrendering its Chengdu F-7P fighters.

The re-equipment of [No. 2 'Minhas' Squadron] was due as they had the oldest lot of F-7s. The JF-17 was the obvious replacement. The Mirage-5PA2/3 is still a capable aircraft, though long in the tooth by now. Most likely, the replacement of these Mirages would have a maritime role, so it could be a couple of years before we see a newer capability. He said Whether that replacement is the Su-35, however, remains to be seen."

Defence News
Sorry but 3 squadrons of SU-35 should come they should come for PAF and dealing with Indian Air Force for Navy two squadrons of J-16 should be the goal. Navy budget should be increased with its own independent Air Arm.
 
I think there is some serious consideration on the behalf of PAF for Su-35s for following reasons.

  • Mirage-5PA2/3 will have to be retired.

  • A platform with extended range is needed to replace them because of newly placed focus on maritime defense and power projection.

  • India is building carriers with Mig-29K, something our existing Mirages etc can not take care of.
  • Su-35S will be an ideal platform to not only defend Karachi, Port Qasim and Gwadar but also be able to effectively support our naval formations and take care of the Indian CBG problem.

  • Su-35 offers PAF unprecedented range to effectively conduct operations not only deep inside India but also deep inside the Indian Ocean Region (IOR).

  • It will solidify Pakistan Navy's sea denial capabilities when integrated with existing assets and force multipliers.

  • It will allow us to quickly respond to any emergency situation in GCC.

  • F-16s, JF-17s even FC-31 cannot offer us such a capability due to different performance parameters and operational doctrines.

    Su-35 assessment by USAF and USN Pilots. Killer in the Sky: Russia's Deadly Su-35 Fighter | The National Interest
 
Last edited:
I think there is some serious consideration on the behalf of PAF for Su-35s for following reasons.

  • Mirage-5PA2/3 will have to be retired.

  • A platform with extended range is needed to replace them because of newly placed focus on maritime defense and power projection.

  • India is building carriers with Mig-29K, something our existing Mirages etc can not take care of.
  • Su-35S will be an ideal platform to not only defend Karachi, Port Qasim and Gwadar but also be able to effectively support our naval formations and take care of the Indian CBG problem.

  • Su-35 offers PAF unprecedented range to effectively conduct operations not only deep inside India but also deep inside the Indian Ocean Region (IOR).

  • It will solidify Pakistan Navy's sea denial capabilities when integrated with existing assets and force multipliers.

  • It will allow us to quickly respond to any emergency situation in GCC.
Well to do missions which you have stated than we need 5 to 6 squadrons of SU-35

Of course, he is retired and doesn't speak on the behalf of PAF anymore. His analysis is his independent thinking. On a personal level he supports the idea of acquiring Su-35s.
I also support it every sane person does
 
Of course, he is retired and doesn't speak on the behalf of PAF anymore. His analysis is his independent thinking. On a personal level he supports the idea of acquiring Su-35s.
His? :D Speaking in third person?
Btw, Su-35 is a remarkable machine.
 
Air Commodore (R) Kaiser Tufail explains the Su-35S offer to defensenews.com

View attachment 256367
"There is a possible need for something in this class on two accounts: diversification and to support naval operations. The Su-35 "being a twin-engined aircraft with vast range (and endurance), it would help us to have a significant and potent presence in the Arabian Sea, something that the puny, aging Mirage squadron is ill-suited for (as is the JF-17 from the range point of view)," he said. "Given the changing geo-politics and the Chinese investment whose trade terminus is Gwadar, there is definitely going to be a need for a long-range fighter. So essentially, I see it as a guarantor of maritime security as far as the airspace is concerned.

"All of this may sound like a sudden switch from continental strategy to a maritime one, but it is high time that we paid serious attention to this aspect in the fast changing geopolitical scenario. Pakistan's air power over the Arabian Sea already received a boost this month when No. 2 'Minhas' Squadron based in Karachi was re-equipped September 6 with the JF-17 Block II after surrendering its Chengdu F-7P fighters.

The re-equipment of [No. 2 'Minhas' Squadron] was due as they had the oldest lot of F-7s. The JF-17 was the obvious replacement. The Mirage-5PA2/3 is still a capable aircraft, though long in the tooth by now. Most likely, the replacement of these Mirages would have a maritime role, so it could be a couple of years before we see a newer capability. He said Whether that replacement is the Su-35, however, remains to be seen."

Defence News

Look it's happening ...... and in near past you were like "NO Su35 COMING"

There is need of dedicated naval strike air craft, operated either by PAF or Navy. But question is...... Will Russians provide us anti ship missiles and spear parts in case of sea battle against India......?

Need of hour is to raise naval strike squadron, not part of PAF but navy and equip it with long range heavy strike air craft, like Chinese Flanker........ and induct Su35S as air superiority fighter and arm at least two sqd of PAF ....... only then we will be truly able to kick India back as hard as it could hurt to bleed
 
2 Squadrons.
2 squadrons should be the start but as economy improves and budget increases we need to increase number of squadrons. 5th Generation is at least a decade away.
 
Look it's happening ...... and in near past you were like "NO Su35 COMING"

There is need of dedicated naval strike air craft, operated either by PAF or Navy. But question is...... Will Russians provide us anti ship missiles and spear parts in case of sea battle against India......?

Need of hour is to raise naval strike squadron, not part of PAF but navy and equip it with long range heavy strike air craft, like Chinese Flanker........ and induct Su35S as air superiority fighter and arm at least two sqd of PAF ....... only then we will be truly able to kick India back as hard as it could hurt to bleed
Even if we get SU35 we should arm it with Chinese Missiles instead of Russian one. No matter what will be capabilities of Russian Missiles they may not prove to be effective enough ag Indian's as they know every bit of Russian Ammo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom