What's new

After INS Arihant, Indian Navy considering nuclear propulsion for aircraft carriers

$@rJen

BANNED
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
6,326
Reaction score
-21
Country
India
Location
Israel
After INS Arihant, Indian Navy considering nuclear propulsion for aircraft carriers
PublishedDecember 15, 2015

SOURCE: IANS

Navy_Arihant1-960x640.jpg


The Indian Navy’s design bureau is favourably considering nuclear propulsion for the second, and possibly a third indigenous aircraft carrier.

Although the final decision is yet to be taken, reliable sources told India Strategic that the navy and the country’s nuclear scientists have drawn sufficient experience from their success in installing nuclear propulsion in Arihant, the country’s first SSBN (ship submersible ballistic nuclear) submarine (or nuclear-propelled, nuclear-armed submarine), which is currently undergoing sea trials, and that is encouraging them to replicate the technology for indigenous aircraft carriers.

Right now, according to the navy chief, Admiral Robin Dhowan, the Naval Design Bureau(NDB) is working towards designing a 60,000 -65,000 tonne aircraft carrier – which will be the biggest vessel to be constructed in the country – and that two major systems under consideration are nuclear propulsion and the new generation aircraft launch system, EMALS (Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch and Recovery System), from the US General Atomics. But there is no final decision yet on either.

India’s first indigenous aircraft carrier, IAC-I or Vikrant, is under construction at the Kochi Shipyard for delivery by end-2018 and it is to be propelled by four LM2500 gas turbine engines from the US GE. Nuclear power is being considered for the second, called IAC-II and likely to be named Vishal. It is planned for induction in 2029.

There is also the strong possibility of another indigenous carrier, IAC-III.

While the IAC-I has a ski-jump to launch aircraft, IAC-II and IAC-III will likely use the EMALS to catapult aircraft from short distances of the carrier decks.

The Indian Navy is looking at three aircraft carriers to ensure 24×7 operations with two Carrier Battle Groups (CBGs). Three carriers are required as one of them will be under periodic maintenance and refits, and accordingly, unavailable.

At present, the Indian Navy has Russia-supplied INS Vikramaditya since 2013, and it should be in service for about 30 to 35 years. India will need its third indigenous carrier by then, and it takes some 10 years to build one, even with new modular construction practices.

Both INS Vikramaditya and IAC-I share the ski-jump system to launch Russian-made MiG 29K aircraft. The EMALS will be much more efficient and powerful to launch different aircraft in moments with the flick of a switch. The US Navy is using the system for its new generation carriers, the Gerald R. Ford (under construction) and John F Kennedy.

As for the IAC-2, sources told India Strategic that the Ministry of Defence (MoD) is set to initiate the first formal step towards according its official sanction by allotting funds to authorize and complete a study on requirements. The second step, a big one, is likely within 2016 in the form of Acceptance of Necessity (AON). That will mean the official go-ahead from the government to start work and funding will be allotted in accordance with the pace of development and construction.

Notably, while the US government is already working on sharing the EMALS

technology with the Indian Navy, development and complex installation of nuclear propulsion will have to be done by the Indians themselves. That is where the success in installing nuclear propulsion in Arihant using low enriched uranium (LEU) offers the incentive and inspiration.

The NDB and scientists from DRDO (Defence Research and Development Organisation) and BARC (Bhabha Atomic Research Centre) are systematically coordinating on this.

Notably again, the US carriers use bomb-grade highly-enriched uranium (HEU) after mastering the technology decades ago. The US Navy is the only one to do so, and apparently will be unwilling to share this expertise. The HEU-propelled vessels have a big advantage as they can go on for 20 to 40 years or more while LEU-propelled ships have to be refuelled every five years or so.

Significantly, Arihant has successfully completed several propulsion and diving trials, and right now, is conducting a series of final tests to launch unarmed missiles from different depths before its likely induction in the coming few weeks. Subject to the success, it will be given a warship pennant number, declared it is operational, and then be cleared for participation in the International Fleet Review (IFR) scheduled for February 2016.

Admiral Dhowan has expressed hope on this, but understandably has been non-committal as even minor tests on board nuclear vessels are critical and nothing is accepted without total success, notwithstanding any time delays.

The Indian Navy already has clearance to build six SSN (nuclear-propelled but not nuclear-armed) submarines and indications are that two to three more SSBN Arihant class vessels are also under different stages of construction – and that they will be larger, and with more powerful nuclear reactors than that of Arihant.

Progression to building nuclear reactors for aircraft carriers is logical, particularly as fossil fuel-powered vessels are dependent on a continuous supply of oil irrespective of the growing cost factors as well as the emerging threats in the Indian Ocean.

China, for instance, has acquired Gwadar from Pakistan to serve both as a commercial port and a naval base, becoming the first foreign power to have this facility so near the Indian shores and the strategic Strait of Hormuz, from where nearly half the world’s oil comes through.

The US also has a major base at Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean, but about 2,400 km from India’s southern state of Tamil Nadu.
 
After constructing miniature Arihant reactor, reactor of Aircraft carrier should be a cake walk. We just have to check the availability of fissile materials.
 
After constructing miniature Arihant reactor, reactor of Aircraft carrier should be a cake walk. We just have to check the availability of fissile materials.

This is what the French thought. A submarine reactor and a reactor setup for a CBG is totally different. CDG faced a lot of problems before things wee sorted out.
 
This is what the French thought. A submarine reactor and a reactor setup for a CBG is totally different. CDG faced a lot of problems before things wee sorted out.
There will be some change but making A/C reactor must be very easy. You do not phase miniaturization issue here. It should just be like a reactor on land with some changes.
 
Finally some proof of what I have been telling self styled experts in PDF all Along.

Nuclear power is being considered for the second, called IAC-II and likely to be named Vishal. It is planned for induction in 2029.

The theoretical induction date is 2029 which means in real life it will be inducted only by 2030 - 2033

There will be some change but making A/C reactor must be very easy. You do not phase miniaturization issue here. It should just be like a reactor on land with some changes.

They May be looking into a HEU reactor for an Carrier. India has so far tested only LEU.
 
Finally some proof of what I have been telling self styled experts in PDF all Along.

I've neen too saying this.. but there was a Idiot from our side keeps on mocking at me. i don't remember his name or else i would have posted this on his face.
 
Finally some proof of what I have been telling self styled experts in PDF all Along.


The theoretical induction date is 2029 which means in real life it will be inducted only by 2030 - 2033


They May be looking into a HEU reactor for an Carrier. India has so far tested only LEU.

If keel is laid by 2017-18 we can definitely expect induction by 2027-28.
 
please elaborate.

HEU vs LEU

i.e. High Enriched Uranium vs. Low Enriched Uranium

Carrier are much harder to cut and weld back to replace their reactors but I suppose newer design might make provisions for nuclear fuel loading.

Charles de Gaulle for e.g. runs on LEU with 10% enrichment. Chinese nuclear subs run on reactors with around 5 % LEU.

ALL of Indian reactors run on LEU. Even our Thorium fast breeder reactors use LEU.

India has only two enrichment plants. One in BARC which produces approximately 2 kg of HEU every year. The one is at Rattehalli Enrichment Facility in Karnataka. The Fuel for Arihant comes from Rattehalli.

If keel is laid by 2017-18 we can definitely expect induction by 2027-28.

How can keel be laied if the design itself is not ready :cheesy:

we have not even decided the Fuel and EMALS :P
 
How can keel be laied if the design itself is not ready :cheesy:

we have not even decided the Fuel and EMALS :P

Design and those two choices can easily be speeded up if US companies are roped in.
2018 is ample time for the above things to happen.
 
Design and those two choices can easily be speeded up if US companies are roped in.
2018 is ample time for the above things to happen.

I see. All so simple. :P

What if India decides not to sign the bilateral agreements and do not get the EMALS ?
 
Logical option will be going for another vikrant type ship,the existing infrastructure & working experience in Cochin shipyard can be used for fast delivery of the ship. Mean time we can go ahead with designing our nuclear powered supercarrier as well as our AMCA also,based on indian shipbuilding industry standard design &construction of such a massive vessel will definitely will be time taking process. Even ADA can also comfortably design AMCA in that time frame.

Also any delay on supercarrier won't affect IN much once we have three aircraft carriers at a time.
 
I would like AC's to be nuclear but before that we need credible SSN's for it.....and some heavy cruisers like the kirov class or P15B, we need to make a good quality LEU reactor for it....and also a fuel efficient one....otherwise ship would spend half of its life in dockyard...
 
I would like AC's to be nuclear but before that we need credible SSN's for it.....and some heavy cruisers like the kirov class or P15B, we need to make a good quality LEU reactor for it....and also a fuel efficient one....otherwise ship would spend half of its life in dockyard...
Absolutely right, even supporting ships for carriers does require long endurance capabilities. But going for all nuclear carrier battle group won't be an economical option,may be nuclear cruisers are possible but frigates & destroyer will require way small yet powerful nuclear reactors and sadly none except US doesnt have miniaturised nuclear powerplants for surface ships.
 
Back
Top Bottom