I don't want a Mutually agreed escalation ladder at all.
So that end the discussion ..... & I think We find ourselves in agreement to welcome each other in hell ....
AIML was the exact mirror of Hindu Mahasabha (today's equivalent of Sangh). Both organisation were non-secular religious right movements.Aiml wanted Muslim home land - pakistan , Sangh wanted Hindu Rashtra - bharat,
AIML's direct action day won , Sangh lost.
But history prove the political contenders were Congress & AIML ... not b/w AIML & Sangha or Hindu Mahasabha plz don't rewrite the history ....
Read BJP's manifesto, there is no commonality with any of Sangh Parrivars rhetoric.
& Manifesto of a Political party is a matter of INTERNATIONAL INTEREST ...???
don't they have Common Interest ...??
Common ideology ...??
Wanna Denny ... ???
BTW How many times do I have to remind you that I do not belong to Internal Audience of India .... are these sensible augments ... ??
Are these addressing any of the Single Query I raised ... ??
Actually, We have been living in the AIML's progeny in our neighborhood since day one, but 70 yrs later the thought of a Sangh entity in power in India is a Global threat. Ohh the irony
No Sir the Irony is that we are living in subcontinent form 1000 years but if some one name his/her children Taimur it become a NATIONAL ISSUE ....
this Mentality & Attitude which should not be Questioned & MUST BE TRUSTED WITH NUCLEAR RESPONSIBILITY
plz come down form you higher horses .....
As the constitution has not been changed and the government that was sworn in abides by the secular constitution of India.
& What is in Practice ... ???
Is India a PRACTICING SECULAR SOCIETY ...??
A Populist right wing Secular constitutional legally democratically elected government. Not neo-nationalist, but a nationalist democratic party.
BJP & Sangh Parrivar represent Secular INDIA .... ??
hahaha ....
& for Democracy part even Hitler was democratically Elected .... its your own people who are saying this not me ....
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...i-cm-arvind-kejriwal/articleshow/56790393.cms
Article 352 of the Indian Constitution.
yes it does.
Again a democracy, not a theocracy.[/QUOTE]
Where was that constitution at the time of Siachen ...
What role democratic parties of India played at that time ... ??
If one nation acts irresponsible it has to pay for it.
Even if one Nation will acts irresponsibly
BOTH THE NATION WILL HAVE TO PAY
And, it is what it is, a deployment strategy for faster deployment of troops. It is one of the doctrines of deployment, doesn't mean it's the only one. Our defensive paradigm is not based on any specific country.
Deployment for what Mass Vacations .... ??
Are you reading your own post .... ??
Are they justifying the informative, intelligent & intellectual level for which you are known ...??
In democracy, even the presidents birth certificate can be questioned, a stated policy is not beyond questioning, India has not revoked it's position on NFU.
India has not revoked it's position on
NFU but the question is till what time .... ??