Given that India has never initiated a unilateral war against any country,
1971 ... ??
it won't, unless there is some massive act of terror against India.
So Is there any way to established that 'EXPECTED' Terror attack will have no internal connection ???
& that they will be supported by elements (not talking about "non-state actors") situated outside the geographical boundary of India .... ???
Who is asking you to trust us? there is no need for you to trust us.
So there must not be
any basis for any relation b/w the two
NUCLEAR POWER (it does not even matter these will be good or bad) ....???
Who by the curse of history are enemy of each other ... ???
You don't want
Mutual Survival .... ??
Or any
Mutually Agreed Escalation Ladder ... to tackle the worst fears of Global community .... ??
Indian nationalism is has and always will be rooted in Secularism and Pluralism.
Hindu Tava ideology & Sangh Parrivar represent
Secularism and Pluralism of INDIAN SOCIETY .... ??
By Singh Pariwar, I am guessing you are referring to Sangh Parrivar. Today what is known as Sangh Parrivar, when started as Hindu Mahasabha was the exact mirror image of the AIML, So understand this, at your worst prediction assume India is taken over by Sangh parrivar and Hindu nationalists,
The exact mirror of AIML was the Congress of Nehru & Gandhi, BTW if
YOU a person sitting in US find it necessary to defend the Sangh Parrivar rather then realizing the
potential danger & denying the need to have a
mechanism to mitigate the risk which may arise anytime, anywhere ... then the DANGER IS MORE REAL AND MANY FOLDS then my assessment ....
Sir plz understand even if that AIML was the mother of all evils in India it no more in existence it no more RELEVANT to the
points I am raising but Sangh Parrivar & BJP exist today they are relevant in today's scenario & EVEN IF THEY ARE ANGELS WE DON'T
TRUST YOUR ANGELS
the result is it becomes a mirror image of Pakistan, as per your own account India at it's worst would be like Pakistan.
What I said was not in context in which you are reading, but even if you want to understand it in that manner then I will say
"I Know to survive in my hell, do you know to survive in yours" ....
It would be alarming for India to give up it's secular nature and become a Hindu Theocracy, or a religious Republic, like Pakistan. there indeed is a mechanism, it's called constitution of the republic. No matter which party is in power in India, it cannot change the constitution of against the wishes of the nation. Even if tomorrow a AIMIM 's chief Owaisi becomes India's Prime minister, india won't change into an Islamic state, that remains the guarantee of a constitution that is sacrosanct to the nation's judicial fabric.
The constitution of India is not a
mutual agreed mechanism to tackle the issues I am talking; it's for Domestic Theater of Indian to serve the purpose to Constitutionalize the STATE, GOVERNANCE & ADMINISTRATION of India. for me it does not matter its Secular, Communal, Religious or Apartheid .... what matter is the ideology in practices & accepted in general masses ....
so Sir plz honestly try to answer the question I asked previously
Can you deny that BJP & singh pariwar are religiously motivated political & social organizations ... ??
& Does they represent Secularism and Pluralism of India Society ... ??
Who is in Power in INDIA Representative of Secularism and Pluralism or Representative Religiously Motivated Neo Nationalism ideologist ... ??
Secondly Can you direct me any War Act under Indian constitution ... ???
Can Indian Constitution ensure that no POLITICIAN can initiate the war at his will ... ???
Plz answer these queries but keep in mind I am not part of your
DOMESTIC AUDIENCE, & you are at
INTERNATIONAL FORUM
Both countries are responsible for their own conduct.
Agreed but WHAT IF ONE ACT IRRESPONSIBLE .... ??
getting the drift what I am saying .... ??
Just to remind you We are talking the TOPIC RELATED TO NUCLEAR ISSUE (& I have highlighted all the relevant issue I have raised in debate) not the Constitution of India
Assuming that India will show immaturity and lack of strategic analysis while pakistan will, is contrarian to the track record of both the nations.
Sir I have posted an excerpt from third part in our private conversation .... was India showing restrain at that time ... ???
Then Why it can not happen again ... ??
Again we are at square one ....
What is the mechanism which can ensure that it will never happen again ... ???
Any Guarantee .... ??
When US & USSR despite not trusting each other can have such BRIDGES why INDIA & PAKISTAN could not have .... ???
No of threats on what? Absolutely India will retaliate if Indian interests come under attack from "Non State Actors" supported by your state Producers and Directors.
INDIA will retaliate to whom for what ....???
again back to the same situation & same relevant queries to the same old theories
So Is there any way to established that 'EXPECTED' Terror attack will have no internal connection ???
& that they will be supported by elements (not talking about "non-state actors") situated outside the geographical boundary of India .... ???
And MOST IMPORTANT QUESTIONS
INDIA IS THE ONLY COUNTRY WHO HAVE THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO RETALIATE .... ???
NO OTHER COUNTRY HAVE THAT RIGHT .... ???
& WHAT INDIAN PLANNERS THINK OTHER WILL NOT RETALIATE .... ??
Which Doctrine to attack whom? India has never had a stated position on any combat doctrine. But what is has repeatedly stated is it's No-First use of Nuclear Weapons, Complete withdrawal of all chemical and Biological weapons. This like these are stated doctrines, other than that there is no stated doctrine of anything.
Should I remind you about this ...??
http://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/army-chief-says-military-must-prepare-for-cold-start-117011301174_1.html
NFU policy .... ???
http://indianexpress.com/article/in...-use-nuclear-policy-adds-my-thinking-4369062/
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...indias-nuke-doctrine/articleshow/55357808.cms
http://web.mit.edu/polisci/news/pdf/NarangFiveMyths.pdf
plz give a read to these links these will surely help .... AGAIN I DOES NOT BELONG TO YOUR DOMESTIC AUDIENCE
I couldn't decipher the above lines.
[/QUOTE]
& this is not my problem
Regards,