Politically, she is an anarchist, or talks like one. By 'anarchist' I am referring to the classical anarchist, a post-Marxian hyper-pacifist. Read her posts carefully; she despises 'states' with such focussed venom that I am fearful she will do herself an injury. She supports the Maoists, but with a pursed-Lipped grim kind of comradely support that makes me believe that there is more than a tinge of disapproval in her evaluation of them. It is just that she thinks that they are better than the state forces they re fighting. Perhaps there is a militant feminist element mixed up in all that. Her feminist streak comes through loud and strong, and to insecure men from the sub-continent, she must appear to be some fearsome figure looming in the mist and smoke, a castratrix prowling around, sickle in hand.
Definitely not socially a good fit. It is just her gritty integrity that wins her some reluctant admiration. People fail to see her complete commitment to social equity.
Tactless is hr middle name. Might as well change her name to ajTtr. Some of the things she says are definitely wince-worthy, even cringe-worthy, but she won't stop to ask about your flesh wounds or whip out a Band Aid. It's up to her listener to catch up.
AND THE WHOLE BLOODY PACK OF YOU CAN STOP CALLING ME SIR! I MEAN THIS. AFTER THIS WARNING, IT IS WAR!