^^^demolition i remember how the buildings use to go down in such a neat formation ...
Anything but neat look at the following picture:
As you can see it didn't just fall "neat" in order to bring the wtc down with a controlled demolition countless workers would have to spend weeks perhaps months stripping the sheetrock and carpets in order to drill the thousands of holes required for the explosive charges, even more obsurd is that they would have to run hundreds of miles of charge wire. Using the thermite excuse is even worse because with thermite workers would some how have to figure out how to get to the calulms then some how place thousands of packages of thermite but here's the catch! Thermite burns slow, the wtc's fell relatively quickly, to add injury to insult thermite is extreemly combostible, in other words the twc would light up like a Christmas tree if thermite was used. Lastly, if either thermite or dynomite was used it would be tripped off by the aircrafts impact or at least cause a disruption in the charge wire.
obviously you need to loosen the key points of the building ie... the steel beams ... if you refer to to video 8 or 9 i think they show pictures of hundreds of beams in a cut out manner as if something ripped throught the metal thoe are linear shaped charges that use thermate to cut throught the metal ...
ahhh those were cut by workers on the ground:
notice the 45 degree angle cut
here how a controled emolition works ... they start from the top by blowing off the colums then one the first of the colums collaps the timer on the other colums blow so it colapses in a sequence which WTC DID if you compare controlled demolition and 911 you will be shocked .... that it for now ill write more later
Are you sure about that? Common sense would say to weaken the lower floor because that is where most of the structures stress is, thus weakening the lower floors would cause the building to simply give out.
Here is a video, look closely, the explosive charges are on the lower floors.
hey freekin just to ask you one thing when a plane hit a wall or building it leaves alot of debre like engines wings or adlest seats it dident leave nothing!!!
There is plenty of debris! You need to stop listening to the conspiracy therorists, they blatantly lie or are too lazy to research or just go off of what other conspiracy theorists tell them, Here's pictures of the wreckage now keep in mind the kenetic energy from the planes impact insured that most debris went through the structure, but nevertheless there is debris even engines.
And so conspiracy theorists can't claim the debris was randomly placed there, here is a picture positively identifying debris from the engine. Now that we know debris was present we also know that the engines and landing gear found at the scence was too big and heavy too heavy to be placed at the scence undetected like many of the conspiracy theorists insist.
many say there was a cruise missel that was with it that dethonated on impact
This is a rubish that comes from conspiracy theorists, it is know that there was hundreds of eye witnesses to the impact and some were even pilots, so no cruise missles.
to sparkling way ..... have you every saw the free falll of WTC ? a building of that size steel beams bending BREAKING and thus comeing down in a couple of seconds? you never answer my question . how can a steel structured building be decimated by air planes?
To put it in simple terms, a plane traveling at 500+ mph will create massive damage, first the plane is a solid mass traveling at an incredible speed, thus much of the support columns will be damaged and not only by the impact but by the massive explossion. Next you have to factor in the hot flames and the massive stress on the weakened columns, remember the fire does NOT need to melt the steel, it just needs to weaken it, after that gravity takes over.
Here is your proof:
Notice the concave vertical beams, this is because the horizontal beams weakened just enough for them the sag, thus pulling in the vertical columns. Like i said earlier gravity did the rest and the end result was that the vertical columns buckled and gave way. The picture is also further proof it was not a demolition.
This illustration explains it a little better:
And this is when the outer walls caved, thus causing the building to 'pancake':
you might say the fuel loosend up the structure wrong open fires have a maximal temperature of 500 degreese and steel dosent get any hotter than the heat applied to it. so how did WTC fall? please explain?
See above explenation. What most people seem to forget is that fuel was not the only combustible inside the wtc, plastic, wood, foam rubber and alot of other highly combustable materials burned. Still not convinced? lets look at bond fires, normally a fresh bond fire isn't hot enough to, for instance, to melt glass, but let the wood burn enough and you will get hot coal that will liquify a glass bottle in seconds, btw the lowest melting point for glass is 1400c.
what about building 7 ? how did it fall? that too was said to be ingulped by flames and loosend as so it falled apart loooooooooool..... you actuailly belive that why dont you do the research ? how can this happen metal being melted and giant pools of molten metal found underneath the wreckage of WTC
It fell for several reasons, one it had a number of deisel generators, 7 i believe, that exploded due to the massive damage it received from the falling debris and it burned unckecked for 7 hours.
