What's new

9\11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB

Yes...And plastic is petroleum product, aka 'dino oil', which of course would burn. Is there any reason to take seriously anyone who asserted that the only thing flammable in an aircraft is avgas?

Apparently not.
 
.
No i'm not talking about a controled demolition, i have posted a link with a demolition expert that sifted through the WTC wreckage and he concluded that it was not a demolition.
This is how stupid it gets. The argument here is that we are trying to 'hide' a controlled demolition. Why the hell would I want to 'hide' a controlled demolition by crashing an aircraft into the building? This make no sense. I crashed a radio controlled airliner into the tower and at the same time I detonated planted explosives sooooo precisely placed that the tower would collapse like a controlled demolition and I hope that the airliner would disguise it.

HOW FV<K1N6 IDIOTIC CAN THIS GET...?!?!

This is why no reputable demolition company would want to put its name on the line. Did we paid off every single one of these professionals in the world? Did we scared them off by threatening their families? Damn...George Bush is one smart mofo. If anything, I would want to make it obvious that an enemy, say Saddam Hussein in collusion with al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, did planted explosives in the towers. I would not 'hide' the controlled demolition by crashing an airliner into the towers. The money spent on the airliners I could use to rig up some 'evidence' to implicate Saddam Hussein so I could invade Iraq 'for oil'.

The more a rational person thinks about these conspiracy theories, the more absurd and fantastic they gets as they tries to get around the logical thought processes.
 
.
I do not like Marxism. However, Marx was right that religion works like opium which creates serious impediments in rational human thinking process. Al Qaeda itself never denied the culpability of the 9/11 attack. It was rather proud for committing this crime and many of them publicly celebrated. Now, since mental dysfunctions have been the prime recruitment criteria of these terrorist lunatics , it is also a lunacy to engage in thoughtful debate with any pseudo-argument raised by them.
 
. . . .
Yes...And plastic is petroleum product, aka 'dino oil', which of course would burn. Is there any reason to take seriously anyone who asserted that the only thing flammable in an aircraft is avgas?

so your baically telling me that a bunch of plastic and office furniture burnt down the steel and weakend it thus makeing a multi billion dollar building collaps which pdl3 says that the collums collaps on each other thus creating kenetic energy ? what about the other collums that weere not even on fire? why did they fall its 100% proven that WTC had the potential to support a plane raming into it without collapsing .... but the most funny thing is that scientist got some samples from WTC they found nano thermite explaine that how can nano thermite be found in WTC its wasent just on one peice of metal it was found every where it is very bad to breath it in and if you know one thing the workers that worked there at the debre have permenant lung damage due to dust and other particales which your goverment dose not cover LOOOL
 
.
Of couse it does, when something can neutralize it, but in the case of the WTC the calapesing floors were just force multiplyers.





Again, the floors were force multiplyers, and the construction of a structure is different to that of soil so of course the energy would be neutralized at some point, in the case of the WTC's it was when it reached the bottom floor.

your whole paragraph is now usless brother..... look at the first video there are secondary explosives going off ,,,, and do you think i would trust a goverment hired monkey who is paid for what he says? its preety funny:P


No i'm not talking about a controled demolition, i have posted a link with a demolition expert that sifted through the WTC wreckage and he concluded that it was not a demolition. Further, those videos are weak, they have no scientific basis, they just go off of what people say. Just because some 18 year old kids made some videos interview people that say they thought they heard explossions means nothing when demolition experts at ground zero debunked their claims. Another thing to consider is that people on 911 were in a state of panic, many people would mistaken a car door slamming with an explossion.

Yet another thing to consider is that people are unreliable, for instance, even though hundreds of eye witnesses seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon and aircraft debris was discovered some dumb people say they seen a missle hit the Pentagon :lol: and its been proven that the more time passes the more people's stories change; people are also susceptable to others. In physiology, for instance, i learned that people can be manipulated into beleiving anything, in one experiment they convinced a girl that she rode in a hot air balloon as a child, that girl even started to give vivid accounts and details of her hot air balloon ride even though it never happened :lol:


In the hystaria of 911 all it takes is one person yelling to clear out because they thought they heard an explossion and before you know it other people will start beleiving they too heard explossions.

Those videos are also deceiving, in 'lose change' they interview a witness that claimed he heard explossions, it tured out they edited out parts of his intervew to make it sound like he said he heard explossion but in reality he said something alone the lines of, the calapese sounded like explossion, it turned out that the subject interview was upset about it, and this is not the first and only account of "truthers" being dishonest and putting a spin on things.

Those videos ignore facts and science and instead focus on hear say, while at the same time making up incredible claims that have zero backing.

your whole paragraph is now usless brother..... look at the first video there are secondary explosives going off ,,,, and do you think i would trust a goverment hired monkey who is paid for what he says? its preety funny:P look at video 6 you so called CNN AND FOX NEWS SAY THAT SECONDARY EXPLOSIVES ARE GOING OFF loool....
 
Last edited:
.
I do not like Marxism. However, Marx was right that religion works like opium which creates serious impediments in rational human thinking process. Al Qaeda itself never denied the culpability of the 9/11 attack. It was rather proud for committing this crime and many of them publicly celebrated. Now, since mental dysfunctions have been the prime recruitment criteria of these terrorist lunatics , it is also a lunacy to engage in thoughtful debate with any pseudo-argument raised by them.

as i say it many times al quida and OBL are fake very fake this whole WOT was planned sayy before anyone knew about it heck there are people like rockofeller who said or been told before 911 that what is going to happen... and opium???? where you get that from? maybe you use to be a daily user of it that why you soo OLD SCHOOL
 
Last edited:
.
look at the first video there are secondary explosives going off ,,,,

Firefighters, police and EMT's reported seeing vehicals explode.

Firefighters reported that abandoned oxogen tanks were oxploding.

Deisel generators from WTC 7 caught fire and exploded.


and do you think i would trust a goverment hired monkey who is paid for what he says?

Do you really beleive that the govervment threatened thousands of people to keep quiet many of which weren't even government employees?


your whole paragraph is now usless brother.....

The point was that 911 conspiracy theorists manipulate and deceive the masses by untruthfully twisting facts and conveniently editing out witness testimonials for their own gains.

Further, i brought up the examples of of flight 77 to illustrate that people are not allways reliable eye witnesses, again to prove my point, hundreds of witnesses seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon and most aggreed that it was a jetliner, yet some say they seen a missle or UFO or whatever else just so they can get publicity.

This is where 911 conspiracy theorists jump in, they will find that one crazy person that claims they seen this or seen that and they will use it to prove that 911 was an 'inside job'.
 
. .
Researchers present new eyewitness testimony which they say proves the government's story to be a "monstrous lie"

witness_flight_path2b.jpg


A three year independent investigation into the September 11, 2001 attack on the Pentagon has yielded new eyewitness evidence which, according to the Southern California-based researchers who conducted the investigation, "conclusively (and unfortunately) establishes as a historical fact that the violence which took place in Arlington that day was not the result of a surprise attack by suicide hijackers, but rather a military black operation involving a carefully planned and skillfully executed deception."

They have compiled the most pertinent testimony into an 81 minute video presentation entitled National Security Alert, which has earned the respect and praise of a growing number of distinguished academics, journalists, writers, entertainers, pilots, and military personnel.

The investigation involved multiple trips to the scene of the crime in Arlington, Virginia, close scrutiny of all official and unofficial data related to the event, and, most importantly, first-person interviews with dozens of eyewitnesses, many of which were conducted and filmed in the exact locations from which they witnessed the plane that allegedly struck the building that day. It was primarily conducted by two men named Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis, also known as Citizen Investigation Team, or CIT.

"There were a growing number of people in the United States and around the world who were suspicious of the government's story about what had happened at the Pentagon that day," Ranke explains. "The doubts were initially fueled by the dubious damage to the building, which seemed incompatible with a 757 crash, the deliberate lack of transparency by the authorities, and many other issues, but they really intensified after a team of professional pilots (Pilots for 9/11 Truth) analyzed the data obtained from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) via a Freedom of Information Act request in 2006, which was supposedly from the black box of American Airlines Flight 77, and found that the last reported altitude of the plane was far too high to have struck the light poles or the building. This meant that either the plane did not cause the observed physical damage, that the government had released fraudulent data, or both."

"We were tired of the cover-up, but we were also frustrated with the dead-end theorizing that was taking place", says Marquis of the project's genesis. "We knew that the only way we were ever going to know what had really happened was if we actually went to the area, knocked on doors, and interviewed everyday people about what they saw."

Watch video: NATIONAL SECURITY ALERT - SENSITIVE INFORMATION

When these eyewitness accounts are aggregated, they paint a very disturbing picture, say the researchers.

"To put it as concisely as possible, the plane had to have flown on a very specific flight path in the final seconds before it reached the Pentagon in order to have caused the observed damage, starting with the light poles that were photographed on the ground and ending with the directional damage to the building itself which was outlined in detail by the American Society of Civil Engineers," explains Ranke. "The government claims the plane flew on this flight path and hit the building. The eyewitnesses in all of the most critical vantage points, on the other hand, independently, unanimously, and unequivocally report a drastically different flight path, proving that the plane absolutely could not have hit the light poles or the building. It is a non-controversial scientific fact that a strike from this trajectory would have caused a very different damage path."

It wasn't just witnesses who watched the plane approach the building that the team spoke with, however.

"We've also published our interview with a Pentagon police officer who saw the plane flying away from the Pentagon immediately after the explosion", says Marquis. "We already knew that the plane could not have hit based on the testimony of the witnesses on the other side of the building who watched it approach, but it was still vindicating to get this kind of confirmation."

A 2006 Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll found that "More than a third of the American public suspects that federal officials assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks or took no action to stop them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East." Nevertheless, Ranke and Marquis acknowledge it is still quite controversial to claim, as they do, that "criminal elements within the U.S. government" were complicit in the attacks.

"If you are skeptical of (or even incensed by) this statement we do not blame you," reads a note on the front page of their website, CitizenInvestigationTeam.com. "We are not asking you to take our word for it, nor do we want you to do that. We want you to view the evidence and see with your own eyes that this is the case. We want you to hear it directly from the eyewitnesses who were there, just as we did."

Many people seem to be taking them up on this offer. Their video has already received almost 70,000 views online since it was first posted to their website a few weeks ago with only a grass roots promotional effort behind it.

Perhaps more notable than the size of the audience, however, is the caliber of some of the people in it. A newly-published compendium of endorsements on the CitizenInvestigationTeam.com website includes praise from a wide array of distinguished and well-respected Americans.

Emmy-award winning actor and former president of The Screen actors Guild, Ed Asner, calls the film a "reasoned, and methodical look at witness testimony the day the Pentagon was attacked on Sept. 11th".

Prolific non-ficition author Dr. Peter Dale Scott, Professor Emeritus of the University of California, Berkeley affirms that the film "successfully rebuts the official account of Flight 77's flight path on 9/11 as it approached the Pentagon".

"If you accept the placement of the plane as independently and unanimously reported by the witnesses presented in CIT's video National Security Alert, science proves that it did not cause the physical damage at the Pentagon on 9/11/2001", says FAA certified pilot Robert Balsamo.

Dr. David Ray Griffin, author of The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé and many other titles, says he is "pleased to be able to recommend this important film with enthusiasm", while scholar, author, and radio host Dr. Kevin Barrett says that the film proves "that the official version of the attack on the Pentagon is false, and that the attack must have been a deceptive military operation, not the kamakaze crash of a hijacked commercial jet."

Scott McKinsey, an award-winning network television director, says "The DVD offers no theorizing or speculation; only corroborated eyewitness evidence contradicting the official flight data to support an overwhelming argument that a plane did not slam into the Pentagon on 9/11".

Architect Richard Gage, AIA, founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth.org), a coalition of over 700 professional architects and engineers calling for a new independent investigation of the destruction of the three skyscrapers in New York on 9/11 (the third was World Trade Center 7), calls the film "long overdue, but worth waiting for" and says that it "deserves serious attention".

Retired Navy Commander and aviator James R. Compton calls National Security Alert "the best reporting I've seen in a long, long time" and "a must see for every citizen in our country".

"Government and media figures who dare ignore evidence this conclusive do so at their own peril", warns Lt. Col. Shelton Lankford, a retired Marine pilot who has flown 303 combat missions.

The full quotes from these individuals and others can be read at here.

National Security Alert can be viewed for free online here.

Source
 
.
Remains of a 200Year old ship found at the foundations of WTC.
(Video in the link)


NEW YORK &#8212; The ship was buried as junk two centuries ago &#8212; landfill to expand a bustling little island of commerce called Manhattan. When it re-emerged this week, surrounded by skyscrapers, it was an instant treasure that popped up from the mud near ground zero.

A 32-foot piece of the vessel was discovered in soil 20 feet under street level, amid noisy bulldozers excavating a parking garage for the future World Trade Center. Near the site of so many grim finds &#8212; Sept. 11 victims' remains, twisted steel &#8212; this one was as unexpected as it was thrilling.

Historians say the ship, believed to date to the 1700s, was defunct by the time it was used around 1810 to extend the shores of lower Manhattan.

"A ship is the summit of what you might find under the World Trade Center &#8212; it's exciting!" said Molly McDonald, an archaeologist who first spotted two pieces of hewn, curved timber &#8212; part of the frame of the ship &#8212; peeking out of the muddy soil at dawn on Tuesday.

By Thursday, she and three colleagues had dug up the hull from a muddy pit where parts of the new trade center are being built.

A steep, hanging ladder trembled with each step down into chaotic mounds of dirt, dwarfed all around by Manhattan skyscrapers rising into the July sun. People sank in the mud as they walked and grasped pieces of the historic wood for support &#8212; touching the centuries-old ship that may once have sailed the Caribbean, according to marine historian Norman Brower, who examined it Thursday.

"It smells like low tide, this muck," said McDonald as she stood on the weathered planks, sniffing the dank odor that hovered over them in the hot summer morning.
 
.
Once upon a time, in a land far far away, there lived some men who wanted some important documents destroyed. They really, really wanted them destroyed and were willing to do anything do get the job done. But they needed a big distraction so that, when the documents were destroyed, nobody would care or even pay attention. Question was, how to do it?

So they looked around, and they found a bunch of crazy fighters willing to die for their cause. They convinced these people to plan an attack on a nearby landmark, an attack so spectacular that nobody would notice the tiny building next door that went up in flames, taking the troublesome documents with it.

All that was left was to facilitate the 'big shebang', the distraction. The crazy tribals would be happy to do the footwork and to die; they even thought they were planning and running the show, but the faceless men knew there was much to be done behind the scenes so the operation would succeed. The normal airspace control and monitoring over the north Atlantic seaboard would have to be compromised; the most-heavily guarded airspace in the world (over Washington DC) would have to be left unguarded just long enough for a plane to sail right through and crash on target; appropriate cover stories would have to be in place for the inevitable postmortem analysis.

But the men knew how to handle these things; they were expert, knowledgeable and in position to manoeuver the inner workings of the US government and the military to effectuate the right conditions.
There would be glitches. Some people might wonder why an intervening building was left intact, but the target building, twice removed from the distraction, was destroyed -- with its cache of IRS, FBI and other government documents. Those people could be dismissed as crazy conspiracy theorists, lumped together with moon landing hoaxers and flat Earthers. And of course the main focus would be on the crazy tribals who carried out the distraction event.
 
.
Here is another perspective of the whole 9/11 Game Plan


On September 10th, the Washington Times runs a story by Rowan Scarborough entitled, “U.S. Troops Would Enforce Peace Under Army Study.” This article focuses on a 68-page paper by the Army School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS), which looks at a variety of issues including different military agencies and their modus operandi. Of the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, the SAMS officers state,
Marc Rich
“Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.”
On September 11th, the attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon is orchestrated by Israel with the complicity of Britain and America, under the orders of the Rothschilds’ which they in turn blame on so-called Muslim terrorists. This is Stage One of getting the Western World to go to war with the Arab World, on behalf of the Jews. Another textbook Mossad false flag operation, remember their motto,
“By Way Of Deception, Thou Shalt Do War
They also will use the attacks to gain control of the few nations in the world who don’t allow Rothschild central banks and so less than one month after these attacks, United States forces attack Afghanistan, one of only seven nations in the world who don’t have a Rothschild controlled central bank. These nations are all predominantly populated by Muslims who, unlike the majority of White Christians (see Nehemiah 5:7), obey their scripture and refuse to partake in the lending or borrowing of money, “usury,” something which has riled the Jews for hundreds of years.
The Jews are also most unhappy with Muslims throughout the world. This is because the plan to destroy the Muslim faith that worked so well for the Jews with regard to the Christian faith has largely failed.
The Jews worked hard to get Muslims to migrate into many Western nations, the plan being that they would forget their religious beliefs and become nothing but consumers of Jewish owned products, services and governments, like the majority of the white Christian world.
Unfortunately the majority of Muslims maintained their religious faith and formed their own communities within these Western nations, failing to fall into the Jews trap, like the Christians. The Jews decide this means the Muslims have to be destroyed, and they decide they’ll get the Christians to do the job for them. Interestingly on the day after the attacks, in the Jerusalem Post, former Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, states,
“Regarding what took place on September 11th, well it's very good... it will generate immediate sympathy for Israel
Interestingly Boston Logan airport from where UAL Flight 175 and AA Flight 11 originated from, which struck the twin towers and Newark airport where UAL 93 originated from and which supposedly crashed in Pennsylvania, both had their security outsourced to a private firm named Huntleigh USA. This firm in turn is a wholly owned subsidiary of an Israeli company called International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS) International N.V., a Holland-based aviation and transportation security firm headed by former Israeli military commanding officers and veterans of government intelligence and security agencies. The principals of ICTS are Menachem Atzmon (convicted in Israel in 1996 when he was treasurer of Ehud Olmert’s Mayorial campaign, for campaign finance fraud unlike his fellow defendant Ehud Olmert who was acquitted and goes on to become Prime Minister of Israel in 2006), and Ezra Harel, who would go onto to die of a heart attack two years later at the age of 53 on his yacht off the coast of Palestine. These two Israeli citizens, took over management of security at the Boston and Newark airports when ICTS bought Huntleigh USA in 1999.
Less than a week before the 9-11 attack on September 5th, the so-called lead hijacker Mohamed Atta and several other hijackers made a still-unexplained visit onboard one of pro-Israeli lobbyist, Ashkenazi Jew, Jack Abramoff’s casino boats. No investigation is undertook as to what they were doing there. Interestingly out of the nineteen so-called hijackers blamed for carrying out the attack on September 11th, seven would turn up still alive, some attending United States embassies in Arabic countries and asking why they are being named as hijackers. Does the United States or the Jewish media question this? No.
On 9-11, five Israelis disguised in Arab clothing are arrested for dancing and cheering while video-taping the World Trade Center Towers collapse. Supposedly employed by Urban Moving Systems, the Israelis are caught with multiple passports, a van which tested positive for explosives and a lot of cash. As a result of this arrest, the Mayor of Jerusalem (and future Prime Minister of Israel), Ehud Olmert, personally calls New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, with instructions for him to intervene in this matter.
Jack Abramoff
Olmert offers the following assurances that these men had nothing to do with the terrorist attack, and were just having a bit of fun, which I guess
, must be something Jews do when they see two giant buildings full of non-Jews collapse, when he states,
“That’s why the five laughed at the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings, they were just being immature and irresponsible.
”
Two of these five Israelis are later revealed to be Mossad, negating Olmert’s claims. The other three are strongly suspected of being Mossad also. As witness reports track the activity of the Israelis, it emerges that they were seen at Liberty Park at the time of the first impact, suggesting a foreknowledge of what was to come.
However, the Israelis are interrogated, and then eventually sent back to Israel and furthermore the arresting officers from New Jersey Police department are told not to discuss their arrest, so presumably if you ever want something done in New York, you’re best off speaking to the Mayor of Jerusalem first.
Interestingly these five Israelis who were dancing and cheering the collapse of the World Trade Center, later appear on radio and television in Israel where they state they were in New York City on September 11th to, “document the event,” as America had never suffered an attack like this on its shores. How did they know the attack was going to attack place?
The owner of a moving company used as a cover by these Mossad agents abandons his business and flees to Israel. The United States Government then classifies all of the evidence related to the Israeli agents and their connections to 9-11.
Much of this is reported to the public via a four part story on Fox News by Carl Cameron. Pressure from Jewish groups, primarily AIPAC, forces Fox News to remove the story from their website
.
Two hours prior to the 9-11 attacks, Odigo, an Israeli company with offices just a few blocks from the World Trade Towers, receives an advance warning of the attack via an internet instant message. The manager of the New York Office provides the FBI with the IP address of the sender of the message, but the FBI does not follow this up. The FBI is investigating five Israeli moving companies as possible fronts for Israeli intelligence.
Carl Cameron
Approximately two hundred Israelis with ties to these moving companies which were very active in the World Trade Center in the months prior to the attack, are subsequently arrested on suspicion of involvement when bomb residue is discovered in some of the removal vans they were using. However, under the direct orders of Michael Chertoff, they deported to Israel as a result of, “visa violations.” Chertoff, a dual United States/Israeli citizen whose father is a Rabbi and mother was one of the first Mossad operatives, prefers to order the arrest of approximately nine hundred Muslims with no ties to the either the World Trade Center or explosive residue. On September 12th, the Jerusalem Post, tipped off about possible exposure of Israel as the perpetrators of the 911 attacks runs a story claiming that two Israelis died on the hijacked airplanes and that 4,000 were missing at the WTC. One week later, a Beirut television station reports that 4,000 Israeli employees of the WTC were absent the day of the attack, which would appear to clarify the story in the Jerusalem Post.
Finally on September 22nd, the New York Times states the following,
“There were, in fact, only three Israelis who had been confirmed as dead: two on the planes and another who had been visiting the towers on business and who was identified and buried.”
Between August 26th and September 11th, a group of speculators, identified by the American Securities and Exchange Commission as Israeli citizens, sold, “short,” a list of 38 stocks that could reasonably be expected to fall in value as a result of the pending attacks. These speculators operated out of the Toronto, Canada, and Frankfurt, Germany, stock exchanges and their profits were specifically stated to be, “in the millions of dollars.” The FBI never follow this up as they know it won’t lead to the official line of Bin Laden, but instead, the real perpetrators, Israel. Also, earlier this year, Lewis Eisenberg who was responsible for the privatisation of the World Trade Center, finds the ideal owner in, former strip club owner, Larry Silverstein. Both of these men have held leadership positions with the United Jewish Appeal (UJA), a billion dollar Jewish, “charity,” organization. Also three months prior to its destruction, Silverstein doubles the insurance on the World Trade Center. Interestingly Silverstein is very close friends with former Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, claiming they have spoken on the phone every Sunday, at the start of the Jewish week, for years.
Following the World Trade Center attack, anonymous letters containing anthrax are sent to various politicians and media executives. As a result of exposure to anthrax within these letters five people are killed. Like the 9-11 attack this is immediately blamed on Al-Qaeda, until it is
discovered that the anthrax contained within those letters is a specific type of weaponized anthrax made by a United States military laboratory. The FBI then discover that the main suspect for these anthrax letters is an Ashkenazi Jew, Dr. Philip Zack, who had been reprimanded several times by his employers due to offensive remarks he made about Arabs. Dr. Philip Zack, was caught on camera entering the storage area where he worked at Fort Detrick which is where the Anthrax was kept. At this point, both the FBI and the mainstream media stopped making any public comments on the case.
Jewish Defence League Chairman since 1985, Ashkenazi Jew, Irv Rubin, is jailed for allegedly plotting to bomb a mosque and the offices of a Arab-American congressman. He dies shortly afterwards, allegedly slitting his throat in a suicide attempt, before he can be brought to trial.
One week prior to the WTC attack, the Zim Shipping Company moves out of its offices in the WTC, breaking its lease and costing the company $50,000. No reason has ever been given, but Zim Shipping Company is half owned by the State of Israel.
As a result of the September 11th attack being blamed on Osama Bin Laden, the United States invade Afghanistan and topple the Taliban rulers there. This did happen but not for the reason I have just told you. The real reason is that Taliban leader, Mullah Omar had banned opium production in July 2000, and thus that year’s opium crop was destroyed. Do you recall what happened in 1839 when the Manchu Emperor in China ordered opium destroyed, to stop the endemic addiction of the Chinese people? The Rothschild family ordered the British Army to go over there to fight the Chinese to protect its’ drug running interests. Well that is exactly what happened here with the United States Army this year. Afghanistan is the source of 75% of the world’s heroin, and due to Mullah Omar’s destruction of 2001’s profits, there was no time to lose in ensuring he couldn’t possibly be allowed to interfere in the profits of this, “Synagogue of Satan,” for 2002, and thus the invasion occurs in October 2001, and soon after, the media is already reporting a bumper crop of opium in March 2002.
Irv Rubin
On October 3rd, Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, makes the following statement to Ashkenazi Jew, Shimon Peres, as reported on Kol Yisrael radio.
“Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that.... I want to tell you something very clear, don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”


Reference Book "The Synagogue of Satan" By Andrew Carrington Hitchcock
 
.
Back
Top Bottom