What's new

3 militants killed in encounter

70 is a small number compared to the hundreds of millions we got rid of during the conquests of Hindustan.

I am talking about Kashmir. If you say that you have killed so many Hindus, then you are contradicting your right to claim Kashmir and whatever Suras you have posted above on slavery, it also contradicts the UNHRC report which some Hindu Chaap were proud of in Islamabad. This also contradicts your previous posts and proves that ideology of Islam is intruding and India has in return complete right to claim whole of Pakistan :lol: More over the statements by your minister above contradicts whatever your ISPR has to say :p:
You literally have no idea what crap you are posting loser!:tdown:
 
:lol:

If you're so Ayran, go to Stormfront and see if they accept you.
Unlike you we don't care about acceptance,
Hindus are widely accepted in all societies,
And your kind is stripped naked on every airport
Including your own prime minister!!?:D:D:tup:

No, you clearly don't.

https://islamqa.info/en/94840

"This is a brief summary of some of the principles of dealing with slaves in a just and kind manner:

1 – Guaranteeing them food and clothing like that of their masters.

It was narrated that Abu Dharr (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “They are your brothers whom Allaah has put under your authority, so if Allaah has put a person’s brother under his authority, let him feed him from what he eats and clothe him from what he wears, and let him not overburden him with work, and if he does overburden him with work, then let him help him.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari (6050).

2 – Preserving their dignity

It was narrated that Abu Hurayrah (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: I heard Abu’l-Qaasim (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) say: “Whoever accuses his slave when he is innocent of what he says will be flogged on the Day of Resurrection, unless he is as he said.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari (6858).

Ibn ‘Umar (may Allaah be pleased with him) manumitted a slave of his, then he picked up a stick or something from the ground and said: There is no more reward in it than the equivalent of this, but I heard the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) say: “Whoever slaps his slave or beats him, his expiation is to manumit him.” Narrated by Muslim (1657).

3 – Being fair towards slaves and treating them kindly

It was narrated that ‘Uthmaan ibn ‘Affaan tweaked the ear of a slave of his when he did something wrong, then he said to him after that: Come and tweak my ear in retaliation. The slave refused but he insisted, so he started to tweak it slightly, and he said to him: Do it strongly, for I cannot bear the punishment on the Day of Resurrection. The slave said: Like that, O my master? The Day that you fear I fear also.

When ‘Abd al-Rahmaan ibn ‘Awf (may Allaah be pleased with him) walked among his slaves, no one could tell him apart from them, because he did not walk ahead of them, and he did not wear anything different from what they wore.

One day ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab passed by and saw some slaves standing and not eating with their master. He got angry and said to their master: What is wrong with people who are selfish towards their servants? Then he called the servants and they ate with them.

A man entered upon Salmaan (may Allaah be pleased with him) and found him making dough – and he was a governor. He said to him: O Abu ‘Abd-Allaah, what is this? He said: We have sent our servant on an errand and we do not want to give him two jobs at once.

4 – There is nothing wrong with slaves having precedence over free men in some matters

- with regard to any religious or worldly matters in which he excels over him. For example, it is valid for a slave to lead the prayer. ‘Aa’ishah the Mother of the Believers had a slave who would lead her in prayer. Indeed the Muslims have been commanded to hear and obey even if a slave is appointed in charge of their affairs.

5 – A slave may buy himself from his master and be free.

If a person is enslaved for some reason but then it becomes apparent that he has given up his wrongdoing and forgotten his past, and he has become a man who shuns evil and seeks to do good, is it permissible to respond to his request to let him go free? Islam says yes, and there are some fuqaha’ who say that this is obligatory and some who say that it is mustahabb.

This is what is called a mukaatabah or contract of manumission between the slave and his master. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And such of your slaves as seek a writing (of emancipation), give them such writing, if you find that there is good and honesty in them. And give them something (yourselves) out of the wealth of Allaah which He has bestowed upon you”

[al-Noor 24:33]

This is how Islam treats slaves justly and kindly.

One of the results of these guidelines is that in many cases, the slave would become a friend of his master; in some cases the master would regard him as a son. Sa’d ibn Haashim al-Khaalidi said, describing a slave of his:

He is not a slave, rather he is a son whom [Allaah] has put under my care.

He has supported me with his good service; he is my hands and my arms.

Another result of the Muslims treating slaves in this manner is that the slaves became part of Muslim families as if they were also family members.

Gustave le Bon says in Hadaarat al-‘Arab (Arab Civilization) (p. 459-460): What I sincerely believe is that slavery among the Muslims is better than slavery among any other people, and that the situation of slaves in the east is better than that of servants in Europe, and that slaves in the east are part of the family. Slaves who wanted to be free could attain freedom by expressing their wish. But despite that, they did not resort to exercising this right."
Hmm slavery is permitted in islam

Muslims, descended from the same ones who massacred your people for a thousand years.
Oh really, product of invasion like you are talking about it so much!
Well you shouldn't mind if we massacre a few thousand in Kashmir ?

70 is a small number compared to the hundreds of millions we got rid of during the conquests of Hindustan.
No wonder the whole world is trying to get rid of you
They are done being infested by you guys, so are we
Its only a matter of time we wipe the slate clean just like Myanmar
 
Unlike you we don't care about acceptance,
Hindus are widely accepted in all societies,
And your kind is stripped naked on every airport
Including your own prime minister!!?:D:D:tup:

And your kind has been my kinds punching bag since we came into existence

:D

There's a reason polytheists are almost gone in every other country.

He's not my Prime Minister, by Allah (The Most Gracious and The Most Merciful), these people can never represent me!

I am talking about Kashmir. If you say that you have killed so many Hindus, then you are contradicting your right to claim Kashmir and whatever Suras you have posted above on slavery, it also contradicts the UNHRC report which some Hindu Chaap were proud of in Islamabad. This also contradicts your previous posts and proves that ideology of Islam is intruding and India has in return complete right to claim whole of Pakistan :lol: More over the statements by your minister above contradicts whatever your ISPR has to say :p:
You literally have no idea what crap you are posting loser!:tdown:

Sure, we are the aggressors. Doesn't change the fact that we will win, just like we have for most of history.

Your natural position is under our boot.
 
And your kind has been my kinds punching bag since we came into existence

:D
Looks like you fail to see the irony in your own words!:whistle:

Let's talk about being punching bags? Who excels in this field ? I think muslims do!!!:azn:
 
Its only a matter of time we wipe the slate clean just like Myanmar

Go ahead, watch what happens.

We have more than just sticks and stones unlike the Rohingya, but even they have managed to rack up a decent kill count.

Let's talk about being punching bags? Who excels in this field ? I think muslims do!!!:azn:

Nope, for most of history we've been the ones doing the conquering.
 
There's a reason polytheists are almost gone in every other country.

He's not my Prime Minister, by Allah (The Most Gracious and The Most Merciful), these people can never represent me!
Polytheists are still here , still strong

Who represents you ?? Taliban or Al Qaeda???:rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
Go ahead, watch what happens.

We have more than just sticks and stones unlike the Rohingya, but even they have managed to rack up a decent kill count.
We will have to see you cry about it in the UN! :sick:
Look like only fools and muslims can achieve high kill ratio with sticks and stones:rofl:
Truth is that you can't do jack Shi!:partay:
 
We will have to see you cry about it in the UN! :sick:
Look like only fools and muslims can achieve high kill ratio with sticks and stones:rofl:
Truth is that you can't do jack Shi!:partay:

Haha, monkey doesn't seem to be able to read, I never mentioned ratio, just numbers.

We can and will do things 1000x worse than what we did to you in the past millennia.
 
Well what can I say ,your khilafat was bombed back to stone age by Russians and US
TOO BAD SO SAD!
Now you have nobody to represent you guys!

Nope, ISIS was not a legitimate Khilafah. The West did our job for us, good on them.
 
Back
Top Bottom