alam.saquiba
BANNED
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2010
- Messages
- 113
- Reaction score
- 0
Wasn't it Reply to Operation Gibraltar???? Pakistan hatched a plan to break kashmir thru Op Gibraltar
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wasn't it Reply to Operation Gibraltar???? Pakistan hatched a plan to break kashmir thru Op Gibraltar
@Md Akmal
Incorrect. The formula agrees between mountbatten, Jinnah & nehru was that secession by the rulers to India or to Pak will be the yardstick for princely kingdoms. Jinnah himself agreed to those principles.People of kashmir wanted to be with Pakistan, who cares whats the ruler wanted, thats what modern democracy you so proudly claim it to be asks for isn't it? the scale on which the subcontinent was divided was simple, muslim majority areas should go to Pakistan and vice versa, kashmiries voted for Pakistan but you wrongly claimed it and because of that all this has started. If only you had followed the british partition method, the kashmir issue would have been solved right there. Just because a tyrant raja asked for it you invaded kashmir. your logic is flawed by birth in this case.
About east Pakistan i did not agree with your firends views. You started this convo by saying this
why suddenly supporting his point of views? are you not sure yourself?
Originally Posted by JonAsad View Post
People of kashmir wanted to be with Pakistan, who cares whats the ruler wanted, thats what modern democracy you so proudly claim it to be asks for isn't it? the scale on which the subcontinent was divided was simple, muslim majority areas should go to Pakistan and vice versa, kashmiries voted for Pakistan but you wrongly claimed it and because of that all this has started. If only you had followed the british partition method, the kashmir issue would have been solved right there. Just because a tyrant raja asked for it you invaded kashmir. your logic is flawed by birth in this case.
About east Pakistan i did not agree with your firends views. You started this convo by saying this
why suddenly supporting his point of views? are you not sure yourself?
In one of the videos he says how "Pakistani destroying the infrastructure in East Pakistan" was a propaganda created and fanned by RAW and India. Yet he boasts about how during the defense of Khulna when the Pakistan army could not hold back the Mukti Bahini and Indian offence, they decided to burn down the paper factory in Khulna, so that it doesn't fall into the hands of army. Wonder what strategic capabilities the paper factory would have provided to the enemy forces Wait forgot to take into account the paper planes that the enemies would have made using the paper from the factory to bomb Pakistani forces in East Pakistan
Rest of the video seems like a rant. He was trying to debunk the Indian Propaganda but ended up pissing propaganda of his own. You cant counter propaganda with bullshyte and then try and take the moral highground
Also who is this Zaid Hamid fella? Seems like he has good following in Pakistan. Sad part is he is very good speaker, only if he used his ability to educate more people, not expedite the brain washing process of Pakistani youth.
Sorry if i offended anyone, just my 2 cents.
@ Actually here he was trying to defendant the Pakistani side as because there were so many propaganda about the Pakistani's genocide, rape and other matters.
@ In the true sense in the battles of East Pakistan, Pakistan Army was not totally defeated rather it was forced on them to surrender. The Indian Army fought with them few battles like Hilli,Kamalpur and Khulna where there was lot of Indian caulties. Since than the Indian decided to by-pass the Pakistani strong holds and move towards Dhaka and they became successful.
@ The killing of Biharis and West Pakistanis in the East Pakistan never came in the world media. Yes we saw it in our eyes but it was so merceless we could not imagine. Now once we add all the killing of Behares and non-Bengalees through out East Pakistan it was no less than a real genocide. It was infact a total annihilation of non-Bengalees what we now term as "ethnic cleancing". About the killing of Behares what Zahid said it is a fact. Now, if you add all these figures than it is closer to 4/5 lacs. These killing were started much before 25 March 1971. In almost all the industries the Bihares were killed.
@ About the killing of Pakistan Army, how many they have killed ? Yes, during the initial days they killed indiscrimately, they killed the Bengalee Police, EPR and East Bengal soldiers during the dis-armament process. Soon it was stopped. Later they used to killed only those who were directly involved with the struggle. I know there were many many police who joined the Pakistani police.All the govt officials joined and collaborated with the Pakistani Forces. The killing of 3 millions and raping of 2 lacs it is a clear cut propaganda.
@ I also agree with you. During the tenure of Ayub Khan sometimes in the central annual budget of Pakistan, the budget allocation for East Pakistan was greater than even from West Pakistan.
@ The economic exploitation of Wast Pakistan from East Pakistan propagated by Awami Leaque was a total farce. The per capita and economic growght of Pakistan was was far better. In those days the ecomony of united Pakistan was considered as a "Nomuna" in the Third World Countries. But ofcourse there were some exploitation by the West Pakistanis.
@ In those days we could really boast that we were real independent except some little bit exploitation. And now, can we say that we are real independent ? Only dancing with Tagore's song, "Purbo degante surju otheche ruto lal ructo lal !!!"
@ In fact it was the "drama for the struggle of Independent State which was already Independent for the interest for someone elses".
@ Actually here he was trying to defendant the Pakistani side as because there were so many propaganda about the Pakistani's genocide, rape and other matters.
@ In the true sense in the battles of East Pakistan, Pakistan Army was not totally defeated rather it was forced on them to surrender. The Indian Army fought with them few battles like Hilli,Kamalpur and Khulna where there was lot of Indian caulties. Since than the Indian decided to by-pass the Pakistani strong holds and move towards Dhaka and they became successful.
@ The killing of Biharis and West Pakistanis in the East Pakistan never came in the world media. Yes we saw it in our eyes but it was so merceless we could not imagine. Now once we add all the killing of Behares and non-Bengalees through out East Pakistan it was no less than a real genocide. It was infact a total annihilation of non-Bengalees what we now term as "ethnic cleancing". About the killing of Behares what Zahid said it is a fact. Now, if you add all these figures than it is closer to 4/5 lacs. These killing were started much before 25 March 1971. In almost all the industries the Bihares were killed.
@ About the killing of Pakistan Army, how many they have killed ? Yes, during the initial days they killed indiscrimately, they killed the Bengalee Police, EPR and East Bengal soldiers during the dis-armament process. Soon it was stopped. Later they used to killed only those who were directly involved with the struggle. I know there were many many police who joined the Pakistani police.All the govt officials joined and collaborated with the Pakistani Forces. The killing of 3 millions and raping of 2 lacs it is a clear cut propaganda.
"Indian and Muktibahini soldiers were present ( 400,000) yet he gave a vague figure of Pakistani army to be around (40000) max, to come to the magical ratio of 1:10 which is like an urban legend. Coincidence? i don't think so when its a known fact that there were at least 60,000-70,000 POWs."
the indians included civilians in the "POW" figure there were only 55,000 army regulars in EP. I think the Indian "official history" for 1971 gives these figures.
wrt to anti-terror operations, Md Akmal is exactly right, after initial chaos discipline was restored to a great degree.
as for the terror it was indian planned and in many cases BSF disguised as locals carried out the atrocities.
the indians included civilians in the "POW" figure there were only 55,000 army regulars in EP. I think the Indian "official history" for 1971 gives these figures.
wrt to anti-terror operations, Md Akmal is exactly right, after initial chaos discipline was restored to a great degree.
as for the terror it was indian planned and in many cases BSF disguised as locals carried out the atrocities.