What's new

1971 facts from fiction

.
Jana Jee,

Cell phone is out of order again :-)wall: ) and your office told me that you're in Karachi and wouldn't give me the contact address!
Are you on a classified mission?? :evil:

How and where can I reach you??

Neo
 
. .
The truth about the Jessore massacre

The massacre may have been genocide, but it wasn’t committed by the Pakistan army. The dead men were non-Bengali residents of Jessore, butchered in broad daylight by Bengali nationalists, reports Sarmila Bose
The bodies lie strewn on the ground. All are adult men, in civilian clothes. A uniformed man with a rifle slung on his back is seen on the right. A smattering of onlookers stand around, a few appear to be working, perhaps to remove the bodies.
The caption of the photo is just as grim as its content: ‘April 2, 1971: Genocide by the Pakistan Occupation Force at Jessore.’ It is in a book printed by Bangladeshis trying to commemorate the victims of their liberation war.
It is a familiar scene. There are many grisly photographs of dead bodies from 1971, published in books, newspapers and websites.
Reading another book on the 1971 war, there was that photograph again — taken from a slightly different angle, but the bodies and the scene of the massacre were the same. But wait a minute! The caption here reads: ‘The bodies of businessmen murdered by rebels in Jessore city.’
The alternative caption is in The East Pakistan Tragedy, by L.F. Rushbrook Williams, written in 1971 before the independence of Bangladesh. Rushbrook Williams is strongly in favour of the Pakistan government and highly critical of the Awami League. However, he was a fellow of All Souls College, Oxford, had served in academia and government in India, and with the BBC and The Times. There was no reason to think he would willfully mislabel a photo of a massacre.
And so, in a bitter war where so many bodies had remained unclaimed, here is a set of murdered men whose bodies are claimed by both sides of the conflict! Who were these men? And who killed them?
It turns out that the massacre in Jessore may have been genocide, but it wasn’t committed by the Pakistan army. The dead men were non-Bengali residents of Jessore, butchered in broad daylight by Bengali nationalists.
It is but one incident, but illustrative of the emerging reality that the conflict in 1971 in East Pakistan was a lot messier than most have been led to believe. Pakistan’s military regime did try to crush the Bengali rebellion by force, and many Bengalis did die for the cause of Bangladesh’s independence. Yet, not every allegation hurled against the Pakistan army was true, while many crimes committed in the name of Bengali nationalism remain concealed.
Once one took a second look, some of the Jessore bodies are dressed in salwar kameez — an indication that they were either West Pakistanis or ‘Biharis’, the non-Bengali East Pakistanis who had migrated from northern India.
As accounts from the involved parties — Pakistan, Bangladesh and India — tend to be highly partisan, it was best to search for foreign eye witnesses, if any. My search took me to newspaper archives from 35 years ago. The New York Times carried the photo on April 3, 1971, captioned: ‘East Pakistani civilians, said to have been slain by government soldiers, lie in Jessore square before burial.’ The Washington Post carried it too, right under its masthead: ‘The bodies of civilians who East Pakistani sources said were massacred by the Pakistani army lie in the streets of Jessore.’ “East Pakistani sources said”, and without further investigation, these august newspapers printed the photo.
In fact, if the Americans had read The Times of London of April 2 and Sunday Times of April 4 or talked to their British colleagues, they would have had a better idea of what was happening in Jessore. In a front-page lead article on April 2 entitled ‘Mass Slaughter of Punjabis in East Bengal,’ The Times war correspondent Nicholas Tomalin wrote an eye-witness account of how he and a team from the BBC programme Panorama saw Bengali troops and civilians march 11 Punjabi civilians to the market place in Jessore where they were then massacred. “Before we were forced to leave by threatening supporters of Shaikh Mujib,” wrote Tomalin, “we saw another 40 Punjabi “spies” being taken towards the killing ground…”
Tomalin followed up on April 4 in Sunday Times with a detailed description of the “mid-day murder” of Punjabis by Bengalis, along with two photos — one of the Punjabi civilians with their hands bound at the Jessore headquarters of the East Pakistan Rifles (a Bengal formation which had mutinied and was fighting on the side of the rebels), and another of their dead bodies lying in the square. He wrote how the Bengali perpetrators tried to deceive them and threatened them, forcing them to leave. As other accounts also testify, the Bengali “irregulars” were the only ones in central Jessore that day, as the Pakistan government forces had retired to their cantonment.
Though the military action had started in Dhaka on March 25 night, most of East Pakistan was still out of the government’s control. Like many other places, “local followers of Sheikh Mujib were in control” in Jessore at that time. Many foreign media reported the killings and counter-killings unleashed by the bloody civil war, in which the army tried to crush the Bengali rebels and Bengali nationalists murdered non-Bengali civilians.
Tomalin records the local Bengalis’ claim that the government soldiers had been shooting earlier and he was shown other bodies of people allegedly killed by army firing. But the massacre of the Punjabi civilians by Bengalis was an event he witnessed himself. Tomalin was killed while covering the Yom Kippur war of 1973, but his eye-witness accounts solve the mystery of the bodies of Jessore.
There were, of course, genuine Bengali civilian victims of the Pakistan army during 1971. Chandhan Sur and his infant son were killed on March 26 along with a dozen other men in Shankharipara, a Hindu area in Dhaka. The surviving members of the Sur family and other residents of Shankharipara recounted to me the dreadful events of that day. Amar, the elder son of the dead man, gave me a photo of his father and brother’s bodies, which he said he had come upon at a Calcutta studio while a refugee in India. The photo shows a man’s body lying on his back, clad in a lungi, with the infant near his feet.
Amar Sur’s anguish about the death of his father and brother (he lost a sister in another shooting incident) at the hands of the Pakistan army is matched by his bitterness about their plight in independent Bangladesh. They may be the children of a ‘shaheed,’ but their home was declared ‘vested property’ by the Bangladesh government, he said, in spite of documents showing that it belonged to his father. Even the Awami League — support for whom had cost this Hindu locality so many lives in 1971 — did nothing to redress this when they formed the government.
In the book 1971: documents on crimes against humanity committed by Pakistan army and their agents in Bangladesh during 1971, published by the Liberation War Museum, Dhaka, I came across the same photo of the Sur father and son’s dead bodies. It is printed twice, one a close-up of the child only, with the caption: ‘Innocent women were raped and then killed along with their children by the barbarous Pakistan Army’. Foreigners might just have mistaken the ‘lungi’ worn by Sur for a ‘saree’, but surely Bangladeshis can tell a man in a ‘lungi’ when they see one! And why present the same ‘body’ twice?
The contradictory claims on the photos of the dead of 1971 reveal in part the difficulty of recording a messy war, but also illustrate vividly what happens when political motives corrupt the cause of justice and humanity. The political need to spin a neat story of Pakistani attackers and Bengali victims made the Bengali perpetrators of the massacre of Punjabi civilians in Jessore conceal their crime and blame the army. The New York Times and The Washington Post “bought” that story too. The media’s reputation is salvaged in this case by the even-handed eye-witness reports of Tomalin in The Times and Sunday Times.
As for the hapless Chandhan Sur and his infant son, the political temptation to smear the enemy to the maximum by accusing him of raping and killing women led to Bangladeshi nationalists denying their own martyrs their rightful recognition. In both cases, the true victims —Punjabis and Bengalis, Hindus and Muslims — were cast aside, their suffering hijacked, by political motivations of others that victimised them a second time around
http://www.telegraphindia.com/1060319/asp/look/story_5969733.asp
 
.
I think the mainstream view is changing, thanks primarily to the interest in these incidents started by this author as well as the declassification of documents by the US. The rape allegations were clearly all bs, as is the 3 million figure. Reporting like this is mainstream (this article is from a highly read Indian website), and this is the changing mainstream view. The Bengali nationalists can moan all they want about these articles, but even the Bangladeshi ambassador to Washington DC admits that the casualty figures given were all lies.
 
.
Shamsher M. Chowdhury, the Bangladesh ambassador in Washington who was commissioned in the Pakistan Army in 1969 but had joined his country’s war of liberation in 1971, acknowledged that Bangladesh alone cannot correct this mistake. Instead, he suggested that Pakistan and Bangladesh form a joint commission to investigate the 1971 disaster and prepare a report.

http://dawn.com/2005/07/07/nat3.htm

Though they're only admitting it now, because they cannot carry on the stupidity. Especially after Archie Blood, the primary US advocate of genocide retracted all his comments about the '71 war being a genocide.
"… as Bengali resistance increased in the countryside, and a situation of civil war was approached, we realised that the term “genocide” was not appropriate to characterise all killings of Muslim Bengalis. Atrocities were being committed on both sides…It seemed to us that Army violence was increasingly being used for military purposes, i e, to secure control of the countryside. "
Blood, Archer (2002): The Cruel Birth of Bangladesh: Memoirs of an American Diplomat, The University Press, Dhaka
You can read bits from that book here

http://www.epw.org.in/showArticles.php?roo...3&filetype=html
 
.
A.Rahman said:
I think the mainstream view is changing, thanks primarily to the interest in these incidents started by this author as well as the declassification of documents by the US. The rape allegations were clearly all bs, as is the 3 million figure. Reporting like this is mainstream (this article is from a highly read Indian website), and this is the changing mainstream view. The Bengali nationalists can moan all they want about these articles, but even the Bangladeshi ambassador to Washington DC admits that the casualty figures given were all lies.

The truth is many journalist and reporters at that time were anti-pakistani and pro-indian, these allegations have also been denied by the awami league itself. Most of the casualties that the bangali nationalist claim as genocide were by the bangali nationalist themselves who were killing anyone that didnt support bangali independance. Either way the 1971 seccesion of east pakistan will be the most sadest day in Pakistan's history
 
.
Kaiser said:
The truth is many journalist and reporters at that time were anti-pakistani and pro-indian, these allegations have also been denied by the awami league itself. Most of the casualties that the bangali nationalist claim as genocide were by the bangali nationalist themselves who were killing anyone that didnt support bangali independance. Either way the 1971 seccesion of east pakistan will be the most sadest day in Pakistan's history

Didn't Pakistan have a commission that analysed all this? I remember reading about it somewhere. What was the findings - anyone know?
 
.
My take on this is, the side that wins the war always writes the history about it and everyone gladly stands by them, accepting whatever that side has to say.

Same thing happened in this case, because Bangladesh came in to being, the world community accepted whatever version of the war (which meant maligning Pakistan Army troops to exaggerated lengths) Bengalis wanted to portray.

Now, however, its a completely different story as more independant researchers try to gaudge what really happened. Essentially, both sides were equally responsible for what occurred in '71.
 
.
TexasJohn said:
Didn't Pakistan have a commission that analysed all this? I remember reading about it somewhere. What was the findings - anyone know?

The Hamdoor Report more or less agreed with it. 30,000 dead was the figure. It mentions some 80 Pakistani troops put into Dacca jail for "excesses" that come in any war, where troops are spread over a large area of land.
 
.
Sid said:
My take on this is, the side that wins the war always writes the history about it and everyone gladly stands by them, accepting whatever that side has to say.

Same thing happened in this case, because Bangladesh came in to being, the world community accepted whatever version of the war (which meant maligning Pakistan Army troops to exaggerated lengths) Bengalis wanted to portray.

Now, however, its a completely different story as more independant researchers try to gaudge what really happened. Essentially, both sides were equally responsible for what occurred in '71.

Or it was just another atempt by hindoostan to malign Pakistan and break it up into two. The mistrust was caused by indian agents and india with the help of zionist news editors in the west launched a campaign to decieve the world about the true events.. Hence the stories about rapes and killings of 3 million citizens .......which was never proven or documented.

I just hope now ..after 30 plus years the TRUTH will come out about the role hindu agents played in the dismemberment of East Pakistan.
 
.
Excellent postulation indeed.

The world then it appears are agents of India.

Any idea what the Bangladeshis have to say?
 
.
I couldn't care less what Bangladeshi's have to say...as far as I'm concerned they were traitors.
Lets also hear what they've to say about India now..
 
.
So the traitors arent traitors anymore, if they say something against India? :woot:
 
.
Jay_ said:
So the traitors arent traitors anymore, if they say something against India? :woot:
No, just another proxy...;)
India lost interest after helping Bangladesh to break away, now we've the advantage again by having an ally against you. But this time with less risk and burden. :)
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom