paritosh
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2008
- Messages
- 3,363
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
@Kasrkin
Kashmir in the United Nations
you'd notice that India was supposed to wait for Pakistan to demilitarize the pakistan controlled kashmiri areas and the northern areas to conduct the plebiscite.'WE' were supposed to conduct the plebiscite under the UN watch and with you as a contesting party....meaning we had to determine the conditions for a free and fair plebiscite.It was Pakistan that lost it's cool and thought that a rebellion would provide a faster solution or at least a turnover of the popular opinion in it's favor in the time of a plebiscite.
you forget to include a whole war in between the rann of kutchh episode and India accepting terms and getting 90% of the territory it contested diplomatically.the point I raised about India accepting third party mediation once the war in Kutch had gone badly still holds.
you sound so naive Kasrkin...di Ayub wait for the commission to set up?Don't you agree that the success of the rann of kutch episode let him to believe that it can be repeated in kashmir?This is the whole point.It wasn't Paksitan that acted maturely and with noble reason...your whole idea was to get Kashmir and Rann of kutchh militarily.The inquiry was set due to Brits intervening after a stale mate was reached and the Pakistani plans gone haywire....I have read numerous accounts of us holding more territory than you...the point I believe is that Pakistan's objectives were not matched in action.You yourself accepted that India endorsed the commission after the Kutch War and before the September War.
that is laughable Kasrkin...you've justified the Kashmir issue not being settled in more than 60 years with that one statement.military maneuvering to encourage a neutral and fair settlement
Not at all....prior to '65 India and Pakistan maintained a similar posture regarding the Kashmir issue.I am presuming that you haven't read the UNSC's statements on the Kashmir issue prior to the '65 war...India used military assertion simply to annex the disputed territory in disregard to prior commitments and UNSC resolutions
Kashmir in the United Nations
you'd notice that India was supposed to wait for Pakistan to demilitarize the pakistan controlled kashmiri areas and the northern areas to conduct the plebiscite.'WE' were supposed to conduct the plebiscite under the UN watch and with you as a contesting party....meaning we had to determine the conditions for a free and fair plebiscite.It was Pakistan that lost it's cool and thought that a rebellion would provide a faster solution or at least a turnover of the popular opinion in it's favor in the time of a plebiscite.