1965 War Documentary Fath-e-Mobin

[Delnavaz B]

Our Major Gen escaped, but your GoC was killed when our tank shot down your helicopter on 12th September
View attachment 317145

Brave soldier serve his nation till the end not like yellow Indian army officer prefer his life over his national pride. Shame.

 

[Tipu7]

Our Major Gen escaped, but your GoC was killed when our tank shot down your helicopter on 12th September
View attachment 317145

He died in battle. Because he was not COWARD to run away .....

Mighty SSG Commandos

Burnt Out Turret
Major General Korla poses for a photograph inside a destroyed turret of a Pak Army Patton tank.


\

Major General Sparrow
Major General Rajinder Singh Sparrow, MVC, GOC 1st Armoured Division, leans on a captured Pakistani Patton tank in this rare color photograph, after the Battle of Assal Uttar (True Answer). It is here where Pakistan's 1st Armoured Division, consisting of American-supplied Patton tanks, suffered a humiliating defeat from the Indian Army.

India lost in Run of Kutch
India lost in Kashmir
India failed to capture Lahore
India failed to capture Sialkot
India failed to divide Pakistan in two halves (a popular claim still used a lot)
It was desperate utter defeat of India who despite of being six times bigger power end up defending its own land against out number & out gunned enemy.

But indeed current Indian generation is brain washed to believe so that they have NEVER lost a war. This is how propaganda thing work.
After defeat of 62 against China, it was necessary to cover up defeat of 65 against Pakistan.

But again, future generation of India (if there will be any) will claim that they won 62 war too .....

So good luck with all such glorious victories of yours ....... lol

 

[pakdefender]

Deep penetration

 

[nik141993]

India lost in Run of Kutch
India lost in Kashmir

yes now run of kutch & kashmir is integral part of pakistan

India failed to capture Lahore
India failed to capture Sialkot

battle of chawinda....india holding more than 500 sq km in sialkot sector along with 1300sq km in other sector ,great pakistan victory

after indian mighty defeate at chawinda...india still holding more than 500 sq km of land in sialkot sector along with 1300sq km in other while sitting comfortabley east of the cannal inside pakistan

after 3 month of ceasfire india still holding territory in sialkot sector

finaly looser india return victor pakistan its lost territory january next year 1966 due to tashkent as pakistan threaten another gibralter,grand slam & assal uttar on india

India failed to divide Pakistan in two

But indeed current generation is brain washed to believe

poor brainwashed indians dont know their own history @cerberus

 

[Crixus]

Not sure if they won or lose anything but they proved one marder momin soldier is equivalet to 10 kafir Hindu baniya soldiers

What did you won exactly ! I mean since the history of Pak from 1947 ?

 

[Hamza913]

You wanted Kashmir Do you get It

The War was Started At Pretext of Operation Gibraltar

A declassified US State Department letter that confirms the existence of hundreds of "infiltrators" in the Indian-administered part of the disputed Kashmir region. Dated during the events running up to the 1965 war.

I Again Warned you Don't Start Picture War You Will Regret If I started Posting

But that was almost 2 weeks before the war started, and was a response to India starting many skirmishes. If you want to include pre-war escalations, then we can go all the way back to April.

We were the defenders, you were the aggressor. The war started with Operation Gibralter. But you ended up losing territory.

No it didn't, there was almost 2 weeks after Gibraltar and then India decided to invade Pakistan. Gibraltar was part of pre-war escalation, and if you include that, we can go back all the way to April of 65.

 

[PaklovesTurkiye]

The most funny and reality thing regarding 1965 war....Indians slipped and truth came out of their mouths, accepted they faced defeat against Pakistan.....@WaLeEdK2 @Sarge @Areesh @Delnavaz B @dsr478 @Max @pakdefender

http://www.newindianexpress.com/nat...y-Over-Pakistan/2015/08/21/article2985500.ece

 

[cerberus]

The most funny and reality thing regarding 1965 war....Indians slipped and truth came out of their mouths, accepted they faced defeat against Pakistan.....@WaLeEdK2 @Sarge @Areesh @Delnavaz B @dsr478 @Max @pakdefender

http://www.newindianexpress.com/nat...y-Over-Pakistan/2015/08/21/article2985500.ece

Please Read Before Posting All you Posting Gloating Over Some Army Advertisement Which wrongly printed

Unlike pakistan India Has Well Maintained Historical Archives And War history reports

Read Report of Your Cold war Allies USA that Time How there Embassy in Karachi Reporting back to state department about Your War propaganda and lies you Solding to your People

Above is a Telegram from the Embassy of the United States in Karachi: "Continuing propaganda regarding achievements of Pak forces seems to have convinced most that only Pak forbearance saved the Indians from disaster." (Look what you Cold war Ally Said About your Establishment )


This you own Medea Exposing Your Military About Propaganda you Fed your people With

In India there is commission Setup After Every war and Action And detailed Report is tabled in Parliament

Here read the Complete 1-14 Chapters of Entire 1965 War Details is Available Publically if you are Historical Student as claim read it

Source :
© History Division, Ministry of Defence, Government of India
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/ARMY/history/1965war/275-war-history-1965.html

He died in battle. Because he was not COWARD to run away .....

India lost in Run of Kutch
India lost in Kashmir
India failed to capture Lahore
India failed to capture Sialkot
India failed to divide Pakistan in two halves (a popular claim still used a lot)
It was desperate utter defeat of India who despite of being aux times bigger power end up defending its own land against out number & out gunned enemy.

But indeed current generation is brain washed to believe so that they have NEVER lost a war. This is how propaganda thing work.
After defeat of 62, it was necessary to cover up defeat of 65.

But again, future generation of India (if there will be any) will claim that they won 62 war too .....

So good luck with all such glorious victories of yours ....... lol

What is Total Count Territory Lost By Pakistan Before ceasefire


Over 1,840 km2 (710 mi2) of territory lost (primarily in Sialkot,Lahore, and Kashmir sectors

• Read In his book titled The greater game: India's race with destiny and China, David Van Praagh wrote[8] –

India won the war. It gained 1,840 km2 (710 sq mi) of Pakistani territory: 640 km2 (250 sq mi) in Azad Kashmir, Pakistan's portion of the state; 460 km2(180 sq mi) of the Sialkot sector; 380 km2 (150 sq mi) far to the south of Sindh; and most critical, 360 km2 (140 sq mi) on the Lahore front. Pakistan took 540 km2 (210 sq mi) of Indian territory: 490 km2 (190 sq mi) in the Chhamb sector and 50 km2 (19 sq mi) around KM


Read What US State Department of History Written in His Records of War

• According to the Office of the Historian within the U.S Department of State:[124]

Conflict resumed again in early 1965, when Pakistani and Indian forces clashed over disputed territory along the border between the two nations. Hostilities intensified that August when the Pakistani army attempted to take Kashmir by force. The attempt to seize the state was unsuccessful, and the second India-Pakistan War reached a stalemate.

But that was almost 2 weeks before the war started, and was a response to India starting many skirmishes. If you want to include pre-war escalations, then we can go all the way back to April.



No it didn't, there was almost 2 weeks after Gibraltar and then India decided to invade Pakistan. Gibraltar was part of pre-war escalation, and if you include that, we can go back all the way to April of 65.

Read What US State Department of History Written in His Records of War

• According to the Office of the Historian within the U.S Department of State:[124]

Conflict resumed again in early 1965, when Pakistani and Indian forces clashed over disputed territory along the border between the two nations. Hostilities intensified that August when the Pakistani army attempted to take Kashmir by force. The attempt to seize the state was unsuccessful, and the second India-Pakistan War reached a stalemate.


A declassified US State Department letter that confirms the existence of hundreds of "infiltrators" in the Indian-administered part of the disputed Kashmir region. Dated during the events running up to the 1965 war.(Operation Gibraltar Pretext of Starting 1965 war )

 

[Windjammer]

When the Bharti Coward panicked.

Mr. Pradhan has devoted an entire chapter of his book to how General Jayanto Nath Chaudhuri, the Indian Army Chief, badly panicked when Pakistani forces mounted a fierce counter-attack during 1965 war. At one point, Gen Chaudhuri ordered Gen Harbakhash Singh to pull back behind the Beas, essentially leaving much of Indian Punjab to Pakistan.

In Chapter 8 titled "Of Cowardice and Panic" of his book "1965 War-The Inside Story", R.D. Pradhan describes the cowardice of Maj. Gen. Niranjan Prasad, the Indian general commanding officer in Kasur sector. When Pakistan Defense Forces counter-attacked the intruding Indian military and the general was fired upon on Sept 6, 1965, he "ran away". Here's an excerpt:

"On learning that, Lt. Gen. Harbakash Singh and the corps commander drove in a Jonga (Nissan P60 Jeep) to the battlefront. Army commander found that the enemy (PAF) air attack had created a havoc on G.T. Road. (Indian) Vehicles were burning and several vehicles of 15 Division abandoned on the road, the drivers having run away, leaving some of the engines still running. Maj. Gen. Niranjan Prasad was hiding in a recently irrigated sugar cane field. As described by Harabakash Singh: "He (Prasad) came out to receive us, with his boots covered with wet mud. He had no head cover, nor was he wearing any badges of his rank. He had stubble on his face, not having shaved." Seeing him in such a stage, Harbakhash Singh asked him: "Whether he was the General Officer commanding a division or a coolie? Why had he removed badges of rank and not shaved? Niranjan Prasad had no answer."

 

[Tipu7]

yes now run of kutch & kashmir is integral part of pakistan


battle of chawinda....india holding more than 500 sq km in sialkot sector along with 1300sq km in other sector ,great pakistan victory

after indian mighty defeate at chawinda...india still holding more than 500 sq km of land in sialkot sector along with 1300sq km in other while sitting comfortabley east of the cannal inside pakistan

after 3 month of ceasfire india still holding territory in sialkot sector

finaly looser india return victor pakistan its lost territory january next year 1966 due to tashkent as pakistan threaten another gibralter,grand slam & assal uttar on india




poor brainwashed indians dont know their own history @cerberus

What is Total Count Territory Lost By Pakistan Before ceasefire


Over 1,840 km2 (710 mi2) of territory lost (primarily in Sialkot,Lahore, and Kashmir sectors

• Read In his book titled The greater game: India's race with destiny and China, David Van Praagh wrote[8] –

India won the war. It gained 1,840 km2 (710 sq mi) of Pakistani territory: 640 km2 (250 sq mi) in Azad Kashmir, Pakistan's portion of the state; 460 km2(180 sq mi) of the Sialkot sector; 380 km2 (150 sq mi) far to the south of Sindh; and most critical, 360 km2 (140 sq mi) on the Lahore front. Pakistan took 540 km2 (210 sq mi) of Indian territory: 490 km2 (190 sq mi) in the Chhamb sector and 50 km2 (19 sq mi) around KM


Read What US State Department of History Written in His Records of War

• According to the Office of the Historian within the U.S Department of State:[124]

Conflict resumed again in early 1965, when Pakistani and Indian forces clashed over disputed territory along the border between the two nations. Hostilities intensified that August when the Pakistani army attempted to take Kashmir by force. The attempt to seize the state was unsuccessful, and the second India-Pakistan War reached a stalemate.

Since you guys still belong to age when Kids determine ''victory'' of war by adding and subtracting number of tanks destroyed, air crafts shot down, soldiers killed and territory gained, so I better safe my time instead of preaching you people that wars are won by determining the extent of goals achieved, the price paid for achieving that goal and the worth of advantages that goals offer in short and long terms.

Wars are won b

 

[Hamza913]

Please Read Before Posting All you Posting Gloating Over Some Army Advertisement Which wrongly printed

Unlike pakistan India Has Well Maintained Historical Archives And War history reports

Read Report of Your Cold war Allies USA that Time How there Embassy in Karachi Reporting back to state department about Your War propaganda and lies you Solding to your People

Above is a Telegram from the Embassy of the United States in Karachi: "Continuing propaganda regarding achievements of Pak forces seems to have convinced most that only Pak forbearance saved the Indians from disaster." (Look what you Cold war Ally Said About your Establishment )


This you own Medea Exposing Your Military About Propaganda you Fed your people With

In India there is commission Setup After Every war and Action And detailed Report is tabled in Parliament

Here read the Complete 1-14 Chapters of Entire 1965 War Details is Available Publically if you are Historical Student as claim read it

Source :
© History Division, Ministry of Defence, Government of India
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/ARMY/history/1965war/275-war-history-1965.html





What is Total Count Territory Lost By Pakistan Before ceasefire


Over 1,840 km2 (710 mi2) of territory lost (primarily in Sialkot,Lahore, and Kashmir sectors

• Read In his book titled The greater game: India's race with destiny and China, David Van Praagh wrote[8] –

India won the war. It gained 1,840 km2 (710 sq mi) of Pakistani territory: 640 km2 (250 sq mi) in Azad Kashmir, Pakistan's portion of the state; 460 km2(180 sq mi) of the Sialkot sector; 380 km2 (150 sq mi) far to the south of Sindh; and most critical, 360 km2 (140 sq mi) on the Lahore front. Pakistan took 540 km2 (210 sq mi) of Indian territory: 490 km2 (190 sq mi) in the Chhamb sector and 50 km2 (19 sq mi) around KM


Read What US State Department of History Written in His Records of War

• According to the Office of the Historian within the U.S Department of State:[124]

Conflict resumed again in early 1965, when Pakistani and Indian forces clashed over disputed territory along the border between the two nations. Hostilities intensified that August when the Pakistani army attempted to take Kashmir by force. The attempt to seize the state was unsuccessful, and the second India-Pakistan War reached a stalemate.



Read What US State Department of History Written in His Records of War

• According to the Office of the Historian within the U.S Department of State:[124]

Conflict resumed again in early 1965, when Pakistani and Indian forces clashed over disputed territory along the border between the two nations. Hostilities intensified that August when the Pakistani army attempted to take Kashmir by force. The attempt to seize the state was unsuccessful, and the second India-Pakistan War reached a stalemate.


A declassified US State Department letter that confirms the existence of hundreds of "infiltrators" in the Indian-administered part of the disputed Kashmir region. Dated during the events running up to the 1965 war.(Operation Gibraltar Pretext of Starting 1965 war )

But it still does not say India won, all it says is it was a stalemate.

 

[cerberus]

When the Bharti Coward panicked.

Mr. Pradhan has devoted an entire chapter of his book to how General Jayanto Nath Chaudhuri, the Indian Army Chief, badly panicked when Pakistani forces mounted a fierce counter-attack during 1965 war. At one point, Gen Chaudhuri ordered Gen Harbakhash Singh to pull back behind the Beas, essentially leaving much of Indian Punjab to Pakistan.

In Chapter 8 titled "Of Cowardice and Panic" of his book "1965 War-The Inside Story", R.D. Pradhan describes the cowardice of Maj. Gen. Niranjan Prasad, the Indian general commanding officer in Kasur sector. When Pakistan Defense Forces counter-attacked the intruding Indian military and the general was fired upon on Sept 6, 1965, he "ran away". Here's an excerpt:

"On learning that, Lt. Gen. Harbakash Singh and the corps commander drove in a Jonga (Nissan P60 Jeep) to the battlefront. Army commander found that the enemy (PAF) air attack had created a havoc on G.T. Road. (Indian) Vehicles were burning and several vehicles of 15 Division abandoned on the road, the drivers having run away, leaving some of the engines still running. Maj. Gen. Niranjan Prasad was hiding in a recently irrigated sugar cane field. As described by Harabakash Singh: "He (Prasad) came out to receive us, with his boots covered with wet mud. He had no head cover, nor was he wearing any badges of his rank. He had stubble on his face, not having shaved." Seeing him in such a stage, Harbakhash Singh asked him: "Whether he was the General Officer commanding a division or a coolie? Why had he removed badges of rank and not shaved? Niranjan Prasad had no answer."

Mighty PAF Didn't Stop Us capturing It gained 1,840 km2 (710 sq mi) of Pakistani territory: 640 km2 (250 sq mi) in Azad Kashmir, Pakistan's portion of the state; 460 km2(180 sq mi) of the Sailkot sector; 380 km2 (150 sq mi) far to the south of Sindh; and most critical, 360 km2 (140 sq mi) on the Lahore front.

This is Brigadier Niranjan Singh
Brigadier Niranjan Singh shows the false outer wall of one of the pill boxes captured in the Battle of Dograi.

Since you guys still belong to age when Kids determine ''victory'' of war by adding and subtracting number of tanks destroyed, air crafts shot down, soldiers killed and territory gained, so I better safe my time instead of preaching you people that wars are won by determining the extent of goals achieved, the price paid for achieving that goal and the worth of advantages that goals offer in short and long terms.

Wars are won b

Sirji India won
After the war, a total of 16 battle honours and 3 theatre honours were awarded to units of the Indian Army, the notable amongst which are:

• Jammu and Kashmir 1965 (theatre honour)
• Punjab 1965 (theatre honour)
• Rajasthan 1965 (theatre honour)
• Assal Uttar

• Burki
• Dograi
• Hajipir

• Kalidhar
• OP Hill
• Phillora

Out Four Major Tank Battles India Won 3 Loss of the American Armour is tell you Story in itself

But it still does not say India won, all it says is it was a stalemate.

Yes that's What Iam Posted this a Fact.In First Page Itself. Its a Ceasefire You as Student Excepted this. But Not Ego of your Country Men

 

[Hamza913]

Yes that's Iam Posted this Fact in First Page Itself Its Ceasefire you No one Victor You as Student Excepted this. But Not Ego of your Country Men

Good God your grammar's atrocious. I'm going to try and understand what you read, but no promises I got it accurate.

Anyway, you failed to take Lahore and Sialkot, if you don't see that as defeat after you started the war then I don't know what is. Oh and your Prime Minister died of heart attack due to the ceasefire terms.

 

[Tipu7]

Sirji India won
After the war, a total of 16 battle honours and 3 theatre honours were awarded to units of the Indian Army, the notable amongst which are:

• Jammu and Kashmir 1965 (theatre honour)
• Punjab 1965 (theatre honour)
• Rajasthan 1965 (theatre honour)
• Assal Uttar

• Burki
• Dograi
• Hajipir

• Kalidhar
• OP Hill
• Phillora

Out Four Major Tank Battles India Won 3 Loss of the American Armour is tell you Story in itself

You are once again proving me correct ......................

 

[Windjammer]

Indians surrender in west Pakistan.

55 Indian soldiers say Namastey and surrendered to one Pakistani helicopter pilot....