ای ایران
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Messages
- 644
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
If Iran can support Hezbollah & others in Syria miles away from Iran then what makes you think 150km is too much?
Because Iran cares about Lebanon, but it doesnt care about Pakistan or Pakistani Baluch.
Lets look at the brief history. Iran helped to establish Hezbollah in 1982 so that the Lebanese could resist Israeli aggression and expell the Israeli occupation forces from their country, which they achieved only after 18 years of struggle. The I.R and Hezbollah are both allied and are ideologically linked and today, Hezbollah is a part of the Lebanese government and security apparatus.
Now, lets look at your country. The Baluch people have rebelled and taken up arms against the Pakistani state. But so what? Iran doesnt care about Pakistani Baluch, it isnt going to help them. There are no ideological or practical reasons why Iran would entertain any type of contact or relations with Baluch groups that have rebelled against Pakistan.
Thats why your previous hypothetical question is absurd, because you are not basing your point on anything to do with facts or reality and are trying to compare apples and oranges.
And 150 km away from the border is pretty far. By foot, thats more than a day or 2 days travel. Given the terrain of mountain and desert, id say its probably more. By car, 150 km would be about a couple of hours drive on a modern highway in most developed countries. In your Balochistan that would probably be a lot longer drive.
OTHO, the attack on Iranian border forces a couple of months ago didnt happen 150 km inside Iranian territory. It happend in the mountains along the border with Pakistan, from which the terrorists had come from and then fled to after the ambush.
Whereas your news article says that: "Turbat is considered to be one of the most sensitive areas of Balochistan. Militants in the area have been targeting security forces and pro-government figures for over past six years."
Thats the difference. Your news report is about a local attack. Iran's issue with Pakistan is about cross-border attacks.
As for client state atleast Pakistan is client state of First world US whereas you choose third world India. Also for Pakistan, Iran inviting India next to Pakistan border is like Pakistan inviting Israel next to Iran border. Your former president said that your issues with US are because of Israel. And if you say Pakistan has rent it's land to anyone then first focus on yourself as you have rented your land to India.
Good that you admit that Pakistan is a client-state of the US. But that you then go on and try to suggest that Iran-India bilateral relations is also one of a client-state nature is laughable.
Neither Iran nor India are subordinate to the other. Their relations are normal, state relations based on common interests.
And Iran has not rented any of its land to any foreigners. So stop making up such stupid things. Its annoying and makes you look like a fool that hasnt a clue about anything.
Are you dumb? I never said these people are Afghans only. In fact many of them are from Afghanistan & countries like Bangladesh, SriLanka, etc. Yes i know many of them are Pakistanis but their destination is not Iran but Europe. Even Irani people illegally goes to Europe.
You tried to claim that the majority of illegals crossing the border from Pakistan into Iran were Afghans, which you know is wrong, so just stop lying.
Prove it. Don't f@rt off topics prove if you got anything.
Yes, Pakistanis are indeed one of the biggest illegal immigrant people trying to get into Europe. In fact, in 2012 there were more Pakistanis trying to illegally get into Greece than even Syrians, who actually have a legit reason to leave their country and seek refuge outside of it.
"Uniformed police officers from 25 countries are already helping Greece guard the Evros River as part of the European Union's border protection agency, Frontex. Greek police figures show more than 21,000 illegal migrants were arrested in the first six months of 2012 after crossing over from Turkey, with nearly all — 20,841 — caught along the northeastern land border rather than on one of the many Aegean islands near the Turkish coast. The figures show a nearly 29 percent increase from the same period last year.
Afghans currently make up the highest number of people crossing illegally, followed by Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, and an increasing number of people from war-ravaged Syria, according to the agency."
In crisis, Greece rounds up immigrants | World news | The Guardian
Yes you are right about this one thing, it is a terrible situation that people should be shot dead at borders anywhere in the World without first being apprehended and questioned. But such is the situation because there is no trust left on the Iranian side because too many times now there have been cross-border attacks by terrorists coming from Pakistan and then fleeing back there.Pakistani forces are not in human that they will shoot at someone without verifying if he is really a criminal or just innocent person who is forced to to take this step out of some issue.