:rofl: top fing kek ,right... all the countries that have "disputes" with tiwan will just roll over & let them take chunks of their country :lol: man if that's not delusion , I do t think you know the definition of the word
:wave:
Sounds more like your delusion than how international politics works , in no scenario is even the combined armies of China & Taiwan capable of countering the countries with disputes in the region .
Russia , India , Japan , n,sKorea ,Vietnam , Indonesia , Malaysia , Philippines etc
Logically...
So if USA puppets Taiwan & USA states officially that arunanchal Pradesh is part of India , why would Tibet ruin its closest diplomatic relations & risk conflict with every single country in the region .
Bubble economies. Won't last , look at your steel & other exports desperately struggling to survive , without fake economic bubbles like these airport they will crash . But what China is doing is just adding more burden on itself , sooner or later like last time , the Chinese bubble will burst ...
You have nothing to gloat about in kargil , your terrorist & army occupied a empty territory when the Indian forces left at winter & systematically lost all control .
Date (1999) Event
May 3 Pakistani intrusion in Kargil reported by local shepherds
May 5 Indian Army patrol sent up; Five...
...India didn't create the international fragile state index , all I did was state a fact , Pakistan is a red zone as far as tourism in concerned .
Its not just your terror index , its more than that, south Asia isnt a popular destination ,compared to the tourism numbers of south east & EU ...
Pakistan is among the most fragile states ,every nation red flags Pakistan as a destination , FSI shows pak currently 2 spots below Afghanistan .
http://fsi.fundforpeace.org/rankings-2015
:disagree:typical pak media chest thumping over nothing , There isn't a single country that can intercept every nuke thrown at them within the respond time , you are talking about hundreds warheads .
EU should carryout the sanctions & bans , before 1993 Pakistan was officially recognised as country that sponsored terrorism, according to USA . The stance only changed in 2002 when they needed pak for Afghanistan insurgencies control.
Apparently anyone who speaks the truth are "indian...
Really , so in those propaganda textbooks of yours , do they teach you about Russia & China ?
Kek spinning B.S. doesn't make it into facts , 45% of the Indian army are already at your doorstep and here you are chest thumping theories about fictional capabilities .
:blah: modi :blah: RSS :blah...
You do realize 45% of the army are placed in the Pakistani & loc border. Logically India can mobilise or respond way faster than Pakistan can.
If India wanted to invade it would have done it long ago , the reason for the simla agreement in 71 was to prevent a another war . The closest thing...
any act of war is in the same dimension as provoking , in which case India will retaliate with 3x the military size of the Pakistani military. With both better tech and resources .
The indian military has built up its capabilities to deal with China , while Pakistan has already 3 strikes ...
It's pointless , that's like taking a bucket of water from the sea . Unless there are drastically increased number of outposts nothing changes. Also for a country that's supposed to be in war in Afghanistan for the past 15 years , why is the border so weak ?