What's new

China renames 6 places in Arunachal, takes its claim over state to whole new level

Just because 1962 was won by China... every narrative ends with 1962.. we Beat India.. so what.. it was against a poorly prepared army and a pussy as leader...
Again.. if Chinese leadership thought they could beat India in a war... they would have piled on their army and arm-twisted India into getting things done their way.. the very fact they don't means they know its not 1962 anymore.
 
Just because 1962 was won by China... every narrative ends with 1962.. we Beat India.. so what.. it was against a poorly prepared army and a pussy as leader...
Again.. if Chinese leadership thought they could beat India in a war... they would have piled on their army and arm-twisted India into getting things done their way.. the very fact they don't means they know its not 1962 anymore.

Your countrymen are saying that Indians troops were about to counter attack, which caused Mao to retreat. That is not true.

But the fact that US troops were about to land in India could be the reason as US troops would permanently be stationed in India.

Also, all leaders since Nehru take defensive posture against China. No Indian leaders ever think about going offensive against China. So if Nehru is a pussy, all other leaders are even bigger pussies as at least Nehru implemented the forward policy, no other leaders even dare to try such policy since. Most were even afraid to invest in infrastructures along the border.
 
Calm down, don't get too excited. for example, Mr Nehru, rashly "forward-policy"... China doesn't even have time to shift the main force from the east to the west.So China can only use second line against India... And that's the way you want it to be.

Make a pleasant imagination... China mobilized troops involved in the Korean war against India...

If you think the India army can defeat UN's army.I agree with all of your ideas.

Conclusion: the war should end in 1962. But China wants political settlement.
Please type in coherent English so I can understand what you are trying to say. In all likelihood, it will be still be gibberish but correct grammar will assist me in understand what tripe you are typing this time.
 
What is this immature approach of dealing with things.

This is so embarrassing at a diplomatic level.

Naming now?
 
Your countrymen are saying that Indians troops were about to counter attack, which caused Mao to retreat. That is not true.

But the fact that US troops were about to land in India could be the reason as US troops would permanently be stationed in India.

Also, all leaders since Nehru takes defensive posture against China. No Indian leaders ever think about going offensive against China. So if Nehru is a pussy, all other leaders are even bigger pussies as at least Nehru implemented the forward policy, no other leaders even dare to try such policy since. Most were even afraid to invest in infrastructures along the border.

China's lines is Tibet is already stretched- main bases are usually 200km from border- and absolutely no settlement on this stretch- However the road connectivity is good- If the air-power was used It would've cut Chinese lines- And when they came inside Tawang even the roads disappeared- so the logic conclusion was to retreat- India was in no condition to counter attack then-

Indira did the same forward policy by occupying Sumdorong Chu- in 1986- But then situation was totally different- Army was well equipped and well supplied and IAF was ready- thanks to Mi26 could lift heavy equipment to front line- Then China decided peace was best option and agreed to keep the valley unoccupied- Interestingly Nehru tried the same thing west of this valley at Namka Chu- But then he left Indian troops there for more than one month with just rice and salt- against the advice to the commander of that area- and China attacked-

China didn't attack when India was sending troops as far as Haji pir in Laddakh but they did when regular Indian troops occupied Namka Chu- Earlier Assam Rifle would occupy these places in Tibet- and Chinese were okay- Some of you posters have no idea of dynamics at Indo-China border- Air power in this area is the key-

And however you may read provocative Daily times and other China news outlets- heating up Indo-China border would drain China's resources heavily with large deployments-
 
Your countrymen are saying that Indians troops were about to counter attack, which caused Mao to retreat. That is not true.

But the fact that US troops were about to land in India could be the reason as US troops would permanently be stationed in India.

Also, all leaders since Nehru take defensive posture against China. No Indian leaders ever think about going offensive against China. So if Nehru is a pussy, all other leaders are even bigger pussies as at least Nehru implemented the forward policy, no other leaders even dare to try such policy since. Most were even afraid to invest in infrastructures along the border.
Interns got busted so the master arrives ... you need to brief them well...
India does not clam any piece of land under Chines control as Historically Indian area.. its only china that claims land in 24 countries across its neighborhood... US army is present in South Korea and in Areas Around Japan... show me one India base where there is an American troop present.. Current generation leadership has handled China pretty well.. thats what Chinese leadership hate... thats why this chest beating...
 
Interns got busted so the master arrives ... you need to brief them well...
India does not clam any piece of land under Chines control as Historically Indian area.. its only china that claims land in 24 countries across its neighborhood... US army is present in South Korea and in Areas Around Japan... show me one India base where there is an American troop present.. Current generation leadership has handled China pretty well.. thats what Chinese leadership hate... thats why this chest beating...

So are you referring to America as masters and Indians as interns?

Mao retreated so there are no American bases in India. Otherwise, India would be full of American bases. India would beg America to protect India, just like Japan and South Korea.

BTW, Why can't Elizabeth be the empress of India. That should still be good for India.
 
So are you referring to America as masters and Indians as interns?

Mao retreated so there are no American bases in India. Otherwise, India would be full of American bases. India would beg America to protect India, just like Japan and South Korea.

BTW, Why can't Elizabeth be the empress of India. That should still be good for India.
I was referring to Chinese 5cent brigade... but now that you wan to play smartass.. lets follow that path... India is not Pakistan that needs China to save it form India... Chinese leadership knows that the geography will make it difficult for Chinese army to defeat India with current India Defense positioning... so they want to beat their chest and fool Chinese people...
 
Please type in coherent English so I can understand what you are trying to say. In all likelihood, it will be still be gibberish but correct grammar will assist me in understand what tripe you are typing this time.
You just need to understand that China and India are fighting, and did not mobilize the main force. This is a very big reservation, enough to show that China wants to solve the problem by political.

Well, general Macarthur should understand better.
 
Indians have a knack for claiming credit for everything. Indians even claim that the Buddha is the reincarnation of Vishnu. Comedians. Lucky for the Chinese, the Indians haven't claim that the Confucius is a Bharat.

Aryan Brahmins of Indian nation who are well versed about the Vedas are well aware about the Avatars chain and they do follow tree of Avatars which shows the blood line of them.

And We never sent a messenger save with the language of his folk, that he [Hazrat Muhammad(SAW)] might make (the message) clear for them. Then Allah sendeth whom He will astray, and guideth whom He will. He is the Mighty, the Wise.(The Holy Quran, Ibrahim 14:4)
 
You ignorant dumb SOB! I am not even a muslim and I haven't seen a Madrassa in my life.
Sumerians invented zero before anyone else if you can't refute it then STFU!



It began to take shape as a number, rather than a punctuation mark between numbers, in India in the fifth century A.D., says Robert Kaplan, author of The Nothing That Is: A Natural History of Zero (Oxford University Press, 2000). "It isn't until then, and not even fully then, that zero gets full citizenship in the republic of numbers," Kaplan says. Some cultures were slow to accept the idea of zero, which for many carried darkly magical connotations.

The second appearance of zero occurred independently in the New World, in Mayan culture, likely in the first few centuries A.D. "That, I suppose, is the most striking example of the zero being devised wholly from scratch," Kaplan says.

Kaplan pinpoints an even earlier emergence of a placeholder zero, a pair of angled wedges used by the Sumerians to denote an empty number column some 4,000 to 5,000 years ago.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/history-of-zero/
 
The Indians don't have much recorded history. They depend on the Arabs and the Chinese for reference. Most of their facts are hearsay.

Aryans do have recorded history and this is the reason i always say that Vedas are first divine revelation from the Supreme Creator. Arabs do respect and understand Vedas and have translated Vedas in Arabic language .

images
 
What is this immature approach of dealing with things.

This is so embarrassing at a diplomatic level.


Naming now?


The Chinese have to appear to having reacted to such an audacious move by India , else how will they face their domestic audience .

After considering major options like asking Pakistan with N arms and BM , providing them with N tipped BM subs , N reactors , sanctioning India , Curtailing water flow to India , vetoing M Azhar , vetoing our NSG membership , the Chinese came out with the joker in the pack.
 
It began to take shape as a number, rather than a punctuation mark between numbers, in India in the fifth century A.D., says Robert Kaplan, author of The Nothing That Is: A Natural History of Zero (Oxford University Press, 2000). "It isn't until then, and not even fully then, that zero gets full citizenship in the republic of numbers," Kaplan says. Some cultures were slow to accept the idea of zero, which for many carried darkly magical connotations.

The second appearance of zero occurred independently in the New World, in Mayan culture, likely in the first few centuries A.D. "That, I suppose, is the most striking example of the zero being devised wholly from scratch," Kaplan says.

Kaplan pinpoints an even earlier emergence of a placeholder zero, a pair of angled wedges used by the Sumerians to denote an empty number column some 4,000 to 5,000 years ago.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/history-of-zero/
Same article says this : TIMELINE shows the development of zero throughout the world. The first recorded zero appeared in Mesopotamia around 3 B.C.

Didn't wanna post that part right! :lol:
 
Back
Top Bottom