What's new

Whats Wrong with ISPR Press release emphasizing "BETTER GOVERNANCE" from Political Leadership

I guess daesh was also zia's fault than

I guess you do not want to answer the question. :D
 
I guess you do not want to answer the question. :D

I am not defending him or his steps or governance....

Argument here is his take over.... for which circumstances were as i pointed out ... please do a search on bhutto and do some reading....
 
I am not defending him or his steps or governance....

Argument here is his take over.... for which circumstances were as i pointed out ... please do a search on bhutto and do some reading....

Sir, it all has been said before: One may try to justify illegal acts, but no matter how hard one tries, they remain illegal.
 
Sir, it all has been said before: One may try to justify illegal acts, but no matter how hard one tries, they remain illegal.
True sir, just like US's illegal wars
 
:D
When did the US Army declare Martial Law in USA?

Give them zardari and see how would they take to declare martial law:D
 
:D

Give them zardari and see how would they take to declare martial law:D

USA has worse politicians than even him.
 
When did the US Army declare Martial Law in USA?
Hi,

It sure did declare illegal wars in another country far worse than declaring martial law locally
 
Hi,

It sure did declare illegal wars in another country far worse than declaring martial law locally

It obeyed its civilian chain of command and did its legal duty under law. Imagine that!
 
It obeyed its civilian chain of command and did its legal duty under law. Imagine that!
Hi,

Still trying to justify illegal will not make it legal sir
 
Hi,

Still trying to justify illegal will not make it legal sir

Sir, we can take up that question in its own thread if you wish. Right now, we are talking about how Armies obey civilian authority under law, not the other way around.
 
Sir, we can take up that question in its own thread if you wish. Right now, we are talking about how Armies obey civilian authority under law, not the other way around.
Hi,

Well, the biased view is quite apparent here. I thought you were saying about justify illegal
 
Hi,

Well, the based view is quite apparent here. I thought you were saying about justify illegal

Sir, I have no bias. The law is the law. I can prove my posts above by the law. Can you?
 
Sir, I have no bias. The law is the law. I can prove my posts above by the law. Can you?
Can your prove the killing of million innocent under the pretext of non existent WMD ?
 
Back
Top Bottom