What's new

Musharraf seeks army’s role in governance

Gufi

RETIRED TTA
Joined
Dec 3, 2014
Messages
2,894
Reaction score
36
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Former president General (retd) Pervez Musharraf has said there is a need of restructuring the political system in the country through an empowered interim government with the backing of the armed forces.

Addressing the annual convention of youth parliament here on Thursday, he said: “Historically no civilian government has performed [efficiently] in the country. The socio-economic condition only improved in the tenure of General Ayub and my government.”

Pervez-Musharraf.jpg


The former army chief suggested giving armed forces a role in the constitution to make Pakistan more prosperous and stronger. “People have always invited army to intervene in difficult time and some elements term it unconstitutional. I think the army should be given the role by making amendment to the constitution in the interest of nation,” he said, adding that the military was not the final solution, but it can create suitable environment for political parties to continue.

Musharraf added that the future of Pakistan would be “bleak” if government slashed the armed forces budget.

“The previous government made a blunder by abolishing 58 (2)(b) under which president of Pakistan had power to dissolve parliament by sending the prime minister packing. It was a good provision in the constitution to hold the prime minister as well as the entire government accountable,” he said. He added that his government established the National Security Council (NSC) comprising members of the armed forces and civilians so that the president could not misuse his authority.

“The president had to get consent from the council before using the 58 (2)(b) powers. Similarly, the army chief had to get the approval from NSC before going ahead with the important decision.”

He said the PPP with the support of opposition parties promulgated the 18 amendment and abolished 58 (2)(b) provision, giving dictatorial powers to party head who can now dispel the elected member of their party from parliament.

Talking about the present situation, the ex-army chief said: “Protests and sit-ins start when justice is not delivered to the masses.”

Meanwhile, the leaders of the Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid (PML-Q), including its president Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain, met General Musharraf at his residence in Karachi late Thursday night.

Published in The Express Tribune, December 5th, 2014.
 
I always thought about why the army does not run in the elections as a party they have such large public support but then again if the army gets a big role then other groups such as beurocrats should get it as well
 
Why not give two-third seats of the parliament to the Armed forces. Due to unity of command, every possible constitutional amendment should be easy for them without worrying about bloody civilians.

The rest of the seats may be occupied by mannequins. Problem solved.
 
i think rather all political people who want to stand for office must be fully approved by army. Educated, honest, hard working people are what is needed and the army has enough on its hand without day to day affairs.
 
Army atleat sud not let those crupt politicians to get money out of counrty.
Politicians destroying Pakistan rather than building..
I support the idea of mushy.
 
Fair point. Since Army ends up meddling in politics, might as well give them some constitutional rights to meddle in politics.
 
i think rather all political people who want to stand for office must be fully approved by army. Educated, honest, hard working people are what is needed and the army has enough on its hand without day to day affairs.
And who the hell is the army to approve anything. They are, technically, security guards who get salaries from our taxes.

Only the tax payers have the right to approve or dis-approve anything.

Fair point. Since Army ends up meddling in politics, might as well give them some constitutional rights to meddle in politics.
Yeah right, security guards should have the the right to meddle in politics.

Why don't we start this practice at our homes; allow security guards to meddle in our affairs. It would really be nice.
 
Military rule is the biggest agent of status quo. If it perpetuates, it stunts nation's political evolution.

Since 2008, Pakistan has come a long way. No matter how corrupt the system has been, a lot of people have understood that these parties are corrupt and there can be better democracy than civilian dictatorship of PPP and PMLN.

At the beginning of 2008, PMLN and PPP were heroes of democracy. This is what Musharraf regime had done our minds. We thought these fraudsters were democrats. Now we know they are nothing but fraud.

The above para is just a small lesson in history and one that can change our destiny. Look at military rules sine 1977. There were two of them. No doubt when the general ruled, the governance was better but their rule left more mess in the wake than the good they did.

The only way forward is to move with civilian rule. Make it better. Make some effort instead of taking a lethargic view of things and expect military to do everything for us.
 
This is against democracy. In democracy, You can not have a role of military in formation of policy and governance. If military is to be given any role than it will not be a democracy. It will allto gather be a different model wher there is a partnership of armed forces along with civilian government.
 
How much does Musharaf matter in Pakistan today ?

Is he relevant or are such utterances an attempt to stay relevant ?

@fatman17
 
just wild though..
why cant army take ove election work of ECof pak ..
so it can be free and fair election which is base of democracy
 
Pakistan civilian government needs improvement.We need a leader like Churchill.
 
He actual mean that WE( nation ) need a check man on bloody corrupt politicians so they have some fear to loot freely.
 
Back
Top Bottom