What's new

What would escalate war with Iran?

of 10000 psi concrete average of granit is about 20000 !


And how did you come to above calculations ?
 
Few sorties and its over!

YOU can comfort you to believe it does not problem to me .... lol

but the GBU 57 take 60 of 5000 psi concrete, and only 8 meters of ONLY P 10,000 psi

granit average is about 20 000.

and as the the other contributor need to know where they r lol

SAY HELLOOOO IRAN NUCLEAR, HELLOOOOOO

SAY HELLOOOO IRAN NUCLEAR, HELLOOOOOO

of 10000 psi concrete average of granit is about 20000 !


And how did you come to above calculations ?


JUST GOOGLE IT IDIOT
 
I prefer an economic deal that restricts Iranian enrichment compared to destroying 10% of Iranian centers and then waiting to find some more. I don't want to be surprised by 5 Iranian nuke tests in a row.
The world was shocked in 1998 after Pakistan's consecutive nuke test, meaning that we have tens of nuke weapons.

an invasion with the current size of US army is certaine faill ...... but to be serious nobody think about invading anything there is simply not the means.

obama and his administration will not lauch an usless attack that will crush their economy.

they r is a lot people that accepte a nuclear iran, rathen than war..... but both hawkist and ther reject an invasion.....

They don't need to destroy all facilities at once. For example if next year air strike operation gets executed. They will set Iran back for couple of years. It will win them more time until they figure out what they are going to do with Iran.


One thing is certain. Neither U.S, nor Israel nor the neighborhood can tolerate nuclear Iran. If Israel gets really desperate they will go for the nuclear option and nuke Tehran. That of course if an invasion fails, which is very unlikely.



Hello
http://www.armyrecognition.com/imag..._bomb_against_Iran_nuclear_facilities_001.jpg

with the current size of US army an invasion is just IMPOSSIBLE..... unthinkable said once michele flournoy......
if nazisrael strike iran with nukes the mean to replicate are there ! and you know what i mean
 
BTW

the simple fact that Obama thinks seriously to appoint Hagel, a man who put his signature on a report which concluded to inefficient of aerial strikes, and know for his oppositions to israels views

obama show clearly that he will not go to war.....

obama will focus on the most important issue for the americans.... the economy ... ( a war on iran will collapse their economy )

as i said

SAY, HELLOOOOO IRAN NUCLEAIR HELLOOOOOO

SAY, HELLOOOOOO IRAN NUCLEAIR HELLOOOOO
 
YOU can comfort you to believe it does not problem to me .... lol

but the GBU 57 take 60 of 5000 psi concrete, and only 8 meters of ONLY P 10,000 psi

granit average is about 20 000.



and as the the other contributor need to know where they r lol

SAY HELLOOOO IRAN NUCLEAR, HELLOOOOOO

SAY HELLOOOO IRAN NUCLEAR, HELLOOOOOO




JUST GOOGLE IT IDIOT

You dish out lies n tell people to google?
Do you know the pascal unit?
Why did not you do the math?
How did you know the strength of concrete that would be used in such construction?
If its RCC, what was the density of steel used?
Go n fool your own stupid folks.

I caught you red handed in earlier post with yr lies, and you never bothered to answer.....
Even audacity has limits....lol
 
They don't need to make fake evidence for Iran because Iran is actually producing it. U.S is making preparations now when Iran gets close to making a bomb, they will act and set Iranian nuclear development back by 4 years.

then why not attack? you are contradicting yourself
 
That would be useless. Iran is providing geographical support to PKk. Recent reporta have shown that they opened camps on Iranian soil. As long as there are country's around such as Iran and Syria who provided support, there is no use in creating buffer zone.

well can you gave us some coordinate for these camps instead claiming such outrageous lies
 
It is a good idea for Turkey to strike Iran in order to damage the nuclear facilities. USA is tied down in the economic problems now.
Turkey should be pro-active.
well it seems KSA have far more uptodate military hardware and have far more money than turkey ,why you don't want to be a little more proactive.
 
then why not attack? you are contradicting yourself

they don't because:

1 - the pentagon is opposed, US army also, obama has no free hands

2 - he don't want see american econmy collapsing, and tense of thousand americans die in matter of weeks

3 - it's useless, bombing or not iran will have the ultimate deterrence, if not yet otherwise iran will humiliate them.


BTW

the simple fact that Obama thinks seriously to appoint Hagel, a man who put his signature on a report which concluded to inefficient of aerial strikes, and know for his oppositions to israels views

obama show clearly that obama come to his sens, he will not go to war.....

obama will rather focus on the most important issue for the americans.... the economy ... ( a war on iran will collapse their economy )


SAY HELLOOOOOO IRA

they don't because:

1 - the pentagon is opposed, US army also, obama has no free hands

2 - he don't want see american econmy collapsing, and tense of thousand americans die in matter of weeks

3 - it's useless, bombing or not iran will have the ultimate deterrence, if not yet otherwise iran will humiliate them.


BTW

the simple fact that Obama thinks seriously to appoint Hagel, a man who put his signature on a report which concluded to inefficient of aerial strikes, and know for his oppositions to israels views

obama show clearly that obama come to his sens, he will not go to war.....

obama will rather focus on the most important issue for the americans.... the economy ... ( a war on iran will collapse their economy )


SAY HELLOOOOOO IRA

SAY, HELOOOOO IRAN NUCLEAIRE, HELLOOOOOO

SAY, HELLOOOOO, IRAN NUCLEARE, HELLOOOOO
 
Really? Say hello to bunker busters to bust your dream up/
http://rt.com/files/news/massive-or...er-buster-144/penetrator-air-look-force.n.jpg


No, an attack will strip iran of the capability of making a nuke. Nobody wants nuclear Iran and nobody will accept it.

A bunker buster will!

I'm not Israeli supporter. I


When they hit the known facilities, Iran will be back by 4 years. The unknown facilities can be found in the mean time.


Really? Let Iran close Hormus and let's see how it becomes reality.


Maybe Nuked Iran, not Nuclear Iran.
well the big daddy of that bomb can't do a damn about Iranian made concrete so pentagon had to sent them back to factory to upgrade and they are still fixing it

Tor M1 is not cent percent accurate against Cruise Missiles, so is Pantsir with 50KM range and RAAD is anti aircraft type.
It is difficult to shoot cruise missile. USA would have a playground and fun.



U.S. has no right to block Israel on Iran: Netanyahu | Reuters

no its not hard to destroy cruise missiles , its hard to detect them but when you detect them they are actually very easy to destroy , they have low speed and fly at low altitude and can't maneuver like an airplane to escape air defence
 
Mistaken you are!

Fordo is well known to US intelligence and its working on it, satellite photos are available with pinpoint GPS accuracy.



It has two opening from 2 tunnels.

Listening device disguised as rock blown up at Fordo nuclear site | The Times of Israel

it would take few precise sorties of GBU 57A on the same spot to punch a hole, once its done, its over.

well sadly that bomb can penetrate the concrete used in Fordoo as much as 10-20cm so they had to send it back for fixing and it still is being fixed

Without SWIFT code, money can not be tranffered beyond borders.

it can be done , have you asked yourself that how they did money transaction before SWIFT or you think SWIFT date back to mongol era
 
well the big daddy of that bomb can't do a damn about Iranian made concrete so pentagon had to sent them back to factory to upgrade and they are still fixing it
Big deal. The fact that Iran was forced to bury those nuclear weapons facilities deeper and under those hardened concrete mean those 'big daddies' are sufficient threat. It is actually easier for US to upgrade them to 'bigger daddies' than for Iran to bury those facilities deeper.

no its not hard to destroy cruise missiles , its hard to detect them but when you detect them they are actually very easy to destroy , they have low speed and fly at low altitude and can't maneuver like an airplane to escape air defence
To counter something you must first detect it. Else it IS hard to destroy those cruise missiles.
 
it can be done , have you asked yourself that how they did money transaction before SWIFT or you think SWIFT date back to mongol era

No wonder Irani currency is down by 35% lol

well sadly that bomb can penetrate the concrete used in Fordoo as much as 10-20cm so they had to send it back for fixing and it still is being fixed


First get the taste of MOP, and then digest it.
You have no other option but constipation or diarrhea....lol
 

Back
Top Bottom