What's new

The curious case of UAE statement

Not true. @BATMAN with help from Pindi was instrumental in initiating a crackdown on this in Switzerland.

59c4818e8bdea.jpg



Just because he doesn't blow his own trumpet, you shouldn't insult him.

That he may have done, but he doesn’t know what me and others do (reference to the virtual world comment). The difference between me and many others is that I’ve met many on here and get stuff done.

He was only insulted after he did so first.

Anyway I don’t want to dwell on this.

I only know of one source i.e. gulf news there i don't find anything stated by ambassador against Pakistan. This is why i said virtual world where you read anti Pakistan statement, which are non existent in real world.

Apparently ambassador is being answering some unknown questions, by unknown reporter.


Ok so why have so many other respectable sources reported it as well e.g. Turkish international news channel TRT?

You say it’s fabricated so why has there been no addressing of this by Banna on his official twitter feed or no statement from him
saying this is false?

I am sorry but even 'neutral' is a insult. Leave asides the Pakistan and India power posturing. Can we just for a second look objectively at Kashmir and Kashmiri's?

  • 8 million Kashmiri.
  • 35,000 soldiers moved into the Valley on top of 10s of Ks already there.
  • Entire Valley turned into a open prison.
  • Communications cut.
  • No internet
  • Curfew imposed
  • All Kashmiri leaders arrested
  • etc
Does this fcukin look like "neutral' to you? And parties to the conflict? Excuse me I did not know the Kashmiri's have a army fighting the Indian Army? Excuse me did they send 35,000 soldiers to New Delhi. This statement makes it look like two equal sides have boot up each others sides. the reality is millions of civilians are under the boot of Indian Army.

There is no "parties to the conflict". There is ONLY victims and abusers. Would anybody here have the cruality to call Palestinan victims in West Bank and IDF soldiers as "parties to conflict" and adhere to neutrality between IDF occupiers and Palestian vicxtims? Seriously. This picture remind you of what is happening in the Valley??? Only worse. At least West Bank is open to media.

5615695d5afbd3ff018b4574-750.jpg


Spot on.

Just look at one of the things in the statement “wisdom of the leaderships”, of Modi?
So statements like “we trust in the wisdom
of the leadership of Israel” is jolly good as well?

Look I’d even be fine with the above had Banna not opened his mouth, but you put two and two together and you have the anger felt.
 
He was only insulted after he did so first.

Do not accuse falsely.
Actually it's your friends who does it like on daily basis, like they have some old beef to settel with me and i know it will continue on daily basis.... because it's deep rooted in their brain washed heads.

Ok so why have so many other respectable sources reported it as well e.g. Turkish international news channel TRT?

You say it’s fabricated so why has there been no addressing of this by Banna on his official twitter feed or no statement from him
saying this is false?


Spot on.

Just look at one of the things in the statement “wisdom of the leaderships”, of Modi?
So statements like “we trust in the wisdom
of the leadership of Israel” is jolly good as well?

Look I’d even be fine with the above had Banna not opened his mouth, but you put two and two together and you have the anger felt.

non of you are talking in context, gives the impression you are trying to confuse the sheep!
You have always tried to put words in my mouth, in order to pull out some material to quote at later stage! nothing new for me.

I said from beginning: >>>>>>>SHOW ME the anti Pakistan words.<<<<<<<
While you choose to press on the words and assumptions and understandings of editor, instead!
I'm by far not in position to confirm, if the conversation ever happened or not. Actually neither Gulfnews and neither TRT reported their source, which may well be Indian news paper, but they both just happened to made a meaningful mistake!

Now since you have quoted ambassador's two words (two verbs) as objectionable “wisdom of the leaderships”
So let's keep the discussion to real thing, and i agree these are the official words! So tell us, what's so spooky in those words?

Regarding your alternate source reference:
I have seen TheNews of Pakistan as well reporting it, but they were also referring to the same GulfNews, but let's just analyse source TRT:
Surprisingly the official words “wisdom of the leaderships” are missing in TRT reporting :(
Otherwise, what they posted as words of ambassador is: “We expect that the changes would improve social justice and security and confidence of the people in the local governance and will encourage further stability and peace,”
Now, UAE ambassador may be over optimistic in his expectations, but it's certainly not a crime against humanity or Pakistan.
One has to be open minded and positive thinking, while engaging with different cultures.

What's more peculiar about the whole blame game is that you choose to ignore official statements from the UAE FM, also posted by GulfNews with reference to official source, instead you choose to continue beating the non existent bush!

TRT also posted a picture from 2016, where modi can bee seen hugging some Arab! but whom are they sending message with picture of Modi hugging Arabs and titling it:
''Shift away from Muslim solidarity'' seriously!!!!!
60556_AP_565535926825_1565168028750.jpg

File: Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, back is received by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, front, at the airport in New Delhi, India, Wednesday, Feb. 10, 2016. Nahyan is on a three day visit to India. (AP Photo/Saurabh Das) (AP)

Now we both read the same news and see the same picture but we both get different messages out!
Obviously i could see the propaganda (masala) part and you fall victim to exactly same!

You all await for official retraction from UAE, which is obviously not coming and you know it as well. May i say, you revived this topic after waiting few days for potential corrections.... now since you are almost sure of your victory, for some thing which is merely figment of your own imagination, so here we are again, on the hunt.
 
Last edited:
If you side with Kafirs in a war between Muslims and Kafirs then you are Kafir.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom