The curious case of UAE statement

[Winchester]

After the goras left after the financial crisis of 2008, Indians are the ones holding up the Dubai economy. So this doesn't surprise me...

“We expect that the changes would improve social justice and security and confidence of the people in the local governance and will encourage further stability and peace,” he added.

Neither does this...

Take note of what everyone has to say on this matter and move on. Their time will come and we will reciprocate. We enjoy a healthy economic relationship with the U.A.E itself so continue with that and lower expectations.

 

[Khafee]

To add more salth on wounds, Gargash had the audacity to say this specefically

"We expect that the changes would improve social justice and security and confidence of the people in the local governance and will encourage further stability and peace,”"


He is endorsing the India stance of removing Article 370. How is that We are clutching to straws ?

.

Dr.Gargash did not say the above, but as usual, you are twisting things to suit your own narrative.

This is the actual statement of Dr.Gargash:

Dr. Anwar bin Mohammed Gargash, Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, stressed "the need to use dialogue for maintaining peace, security and stability in the region."


He also expressed the UAE's confidence in the wisdom of the leaderships of both India and Pakistan and their ability to "overcome this crisis through communication and constructive dialogue, away from escalation and confrontation."

http://wam.ae/en/details/1395302779505
Offical news agency

After the goras left after the financial crisis of 2008, Indians are the ones holding up the Dubai economy. So this doesn't surprise me...

“We expect that the changes would improve social justice and security and confidence of the people in the local governance and will encourage further stability and peace,” he added.

Neither does this...

View attachment 573431



Take note of what everyone has to say on this matter and move on. Their time will come and we will reciprocate. We enjoy a healthy economic relationship with the U.A.E itself so continue with that and lower expectations.

You have no clue about the UAE economy, or Pak -UAE relations, so best for you to not comment on it.

ISLAMABAD, Mar 23(APP): A military contingent of United Arab Emirates (UAE) participated in the Pakistan Day parade, held at Shakarparian Parade Avenue here on Friday.
This was the first time that a UAE military contingent participated in the official ceremony of the Pakistan Day.
https://www.app.com.pk/uae-jordan-m...air-force-planes-feature-pakistan-day-parade/


Troops from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) participated in the parade for the first time.
https://www.dawn.com/news/1397042

@Oscar @Dubious Please see how this think tank is misquoting to further his agenda.

 

[war&peace]

I am also quite sure that either the deep state or PMIK want to normalise the LOC as a border. While Pakistan does not lack the ability to hurt India but definitely lacks the will.

Stop peddling pure BS.

 

[BATMAN]

- Dr. Gargash didnot refute Ambassador claim which means he endorsed his view which means it is State of UAE stance

- Dr Gargash forgot that kashmir is a UN recognized disputed territory and India is not willing to talk yet he is offering crappy suggestions

-Dr. Gargash is asking India to talk to Pakistan when he knows India has refused so many offers for talks from Imran Khan

- Dr Gargash is rubbing salt on wounds

+ If you are Dr. Gargash, what words would you feel require refuting?
+ Crappy or not, first you tell us how you come to the conclusion that Dr. Gargash forgot UN position on Kashmir?
+ I agree here, Instead..... Dr. Gargash should have asked Pakistan to invade India!
+ You are feeling rubbed without valid reason.

After the goras left after the financial crisis of 2008, Indians are the ones holding up the Dubai economy. So this doesn't surprise me.

Indians are holding up because of democracy of Pakistan... this down fall started from 1990's. Earlier it was all Pakistanis... you may go ahead and ask for official stats. from Dubai, in case you are really misinformed, but if you already know and are trying to mislead... it's your choice!

 

[The Eagle]

I understood you will smash hard on UAE, unless they issue rejection... i may be wrong in my understanding.

I wouldn't explain my position but the way you understood the same in first place, tells me a lot about many problems occurring due to comprehension or call it misunderstanding. I think there is no point to discuss the matter further. Only time will tell whom to be smashed.

 

[BATMAN]

I wouldn't explain my position but the way you understood the same in first place, tells me a lot about many problems occurring due to comprehension or call it misunderstanding. I think there is no point to discuss the matter further. Only time will tell whom to be smashed.

I have edited my post.

He is just stubborn. Wants to emulate peaceful muslim conquests.

Let him get humiliated for delaying fate of Pakistans glorious rise.

Waoo.... that's free-kin way above my head.
In any case i can trust you.

 

[Winchester]

https://gulfnews.com/business/india...nd-largest-investor-in-fdi-capital-1.61312130

With so much at stake, U.A.E will keep a balance when it comes to its relationship with India and Pakistan.

 

[BATMAN]

@BATMAN please stop getting confused...read properly!

Ooopss.

https://gulfnews.com/business/india...nd-largest-investor-in-fdi-capital-1.61312130

With so much at stake, U.A.E will keep a balance when it comes to its relationship with India and Pakistan.

What does Pakistan had at stake, when we officially choose to side with houthi terrorist and refused to show even a diplomatic support.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

https://gulfnews.com/business/india...nd-largest-investor-in-fdi-capital-1.61312130

With so much at stake, U.A.E will keep a balance when it comes to its relationship with India and Pakistan.

Business. Profit/loss. Come first. Time Pakistan learn't this lesson from UAE.

 

[The Eagle]

To add more salth on wounds, Gargash had the audacity to say this specefically

Controversial statement came from Dr Ahmad Al Banna, the UAE ambassador to India while Dr Anwar Mohammed Gargash had the neutral stance like anyone else. Furthermore Mr. Gargash is leading UAE foreign office and his statement is OK per situation.

I do agree with Oscar on the point that Ambassador has to make some pro-host remarks due to the nature of responsibilities.

We can make it even if UAE ambassador to Pakistan does a bit of favour for Kashmir in personal capacity. This debate will pretty much conclude.

 

[BATMAN]

I will ask a simple question. Did State of UAE or Ambassador himself denied his remarks that was attributed to him in which he was speaking on behalf of UAE ?

To add more salth on wounds, Gargash had the audacity to say this specefically

"We expect that the changes would improve social justice and security and confidence of the people in the local governance and will encourage further stability and peace,”"


He is endorsing the India stance of removing Article 370. How is that We are clutching to straws ?

First of all read my post:

The curious case of UAE statement

 

[Winchester]

Ooopss.



What does Pakistan had at stake, when we officially choose to side with houthi terrorist and refused to show even a diplomatic support.

Pakistan has always put the territorial integrity of Saudi Arabia, a cornerstone of our foreign policy. We also maintain a certain level of troop prrsence there to increase Saudi capacity to defend itself.

Saudi Arabia appreciates our role and it would be wise for you not to create mistrust between two strategic allies.

What you need to understand that we have different levels of relationship with all Gulf countries. The U.A.E has made a choice and we respect that and look forward to increasing our own economic relationship with them.

 

[The Eagle]

I have edited my post.

So I will say that if there comes a point where we may have a rebuttal, mother of fake news will be smashed with everything to the bottom of Ocean. Also, then expect an aggressive drive by Pakistan foreign office as well against fake media factory and fascist regime in neighborhood. But it may remain a wish.

On a side note : We all need to read and realize situation as per facts and findings instead of our already decided and cooked mindset against particular characters, persons, entities etc etc.

 

[Winchester]

Business. Profit/loss. Come first. Time Pakistan learn't this lesson from UAE.

And that has transformed what was once a glorified shopping mall into the most dynamic economy of the Arab world.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

Controversial statement came from Dr Ahmad Al Banna, the UAE ambassador to India while Dr Anwar Mohammed Gargash had the neutral stance like anyone else. Furthermore Mr. Gargash is leading UAE foreign office and his statement is OK per situation.

I do agree with Oscar on the point that Ambassador has to make some pro-host remarks due to the nature of responsibilities.

We can make it even if UAE ambassador to Pakistan does a bit of favour for Kashmir in personal capacity. This debate will pretty much conclude.

The problem my dear friend is you can window dress this as much as you want. But. but it won't alter one fact. sometimes being neutral is not being neutral. If my friend had a argumant with another person my involvement would not be neutral. It would be biased. Next time israel thumps the Palestinians do you think a neutral statement by Pak FM would be acceptable? Like "Pakistan implores both Israel and Palestinians to show restraint and has full confidence both sides will resolve the matter"?

Yes, you can say that UAE is looking through the prism of profit/loss and becaudse of that it has to be wary that it does not offend India. That would be fine. At least there would be non of this intoxicated rubbish about "brotherhood" flying around. Thus far only China has been forthright in it's statement. Followed by Turkey. This should teach everybody the misplaced idea of ummah. As people can see there is no correlation between Muslim countries and support on Kashmir. As I already stated thus far the athiests in Beijing have been the most robust in support of Kashmir.

All this exposes threadbare how geo-politics works. Self interest. Profit/loss. Not religions.