What's new

Muslims safer in India than anywhere else in world: Yogi Adityanath

It happens both ways brother, the rioters are not restricted to one community only.

Okay if that is the case then your society needs to revisit why they don't spare children, women, pregnant women during their riots. I may have enmity with you but there is no bravery in harming your family and children.
 
Give me stats to prove that...

I can think of dozens of nations which had less people killed in religious violence during the last decades than India.

You dont need stats for that. Just quick round up of international news is enough. Muslims are killing are being killed everywhere
 
I'm sure the victims of the 2002 Gujarati riot agree with the title of this thread.
Myth 1: 2,000 Muslims were killed in the Gujarat riots
Posted on May 22, 2008 - Filed Under 12-Concocted Lies and Myths by the media | 678 Comments
Fact: As per figures given by the then Union Minister of State for Home Shriprakash Jaiswal, who belongs to the Congress Party, in Parliament on 11 May 2005, 790 Muslims and 254 Hindus were killed in the riots, 2548 people were injured and 223 people were missing. This was in a WRITTEN REPLY to a question asked by a Congress member on the religion wise casualties in Gujarat after Godhra. The report placed the number of riot-affected widows at 919 and the number of children orphaned at 606. The UPA government gives these figures, and hence they themselves may be inflated. To read the Rajya Sabha records click:

http://164.100.47.5/EDAILYQUESTIONS/sessionno/204/uq11052005.pdf

'Post-Godhra toll: 254 Hindus, 790 Muslims' - Express India or

http://news.indiainfo.com/2005/05/11/1105godhra-rs.html

Even Indian Muslims’ English newspaper Milli Gazette also reported this

790 Muslims, 254 Hindus perished in post-Godhra, The Milli Gazette, Vol.6No.11, MG129 (1-15 June 05)

BBC too reported the same.

BBC NEWS | South Asia | Gujarat riot death toll revealed
Total 900 killed not 2000.
 
Both Hindus and Muslims were victims in the hands of the rioters of the 2002 Gujrat riot, since none of them tried to leave the country after the riot proves that they agree with the statement.



I mean disservice to mankind by wasting your time in pdf. :P



I partially support the following:

* Haj Subsidy to be scrapped: In my opinion all religious subsidies for all communities should be scrapped, that's not the state's business.
- FULLY AGREE.


* Bhagat Singh photos on currency notes: Add Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose's photo also, they also deserve a place there along with Gandhiji.
- There are so many currency denominations available. Can be done but I fear it might give rise to further bout of politics regarding which photos should be used.

*Make them sing Saraswati Vandana: It should be our national anthem.
- Non-Hindus wont accept it. Saraswati is a Hindu Godess.

* Btw, Sanskrit is the mother language of all Indian languages, including the ones Muslims speak. It's not bad to learn some basics of it for 2-3 years in school.
- Fully agree on it. In convent schools its essential subject till Class VIII
 
You dont need stats for that. Just quick round up of international news is enough. Muslims are killing are being killed everywhere
So you still saying that India is the safest place for Muslims?

How many Muslims were killed in riots here in the last 10 years? How many were killed in Switzerland? Germany? etc etc
 
So you still saying that India is the safest place for Muslims?

How many Muslims were killed in riots here in the last 10 years? How many were killed in Switzerland? Germany? etc etc

Not necessarily killed. But to say that Muslims are safer in these countries than India, would be an overstatement

Anti-Muslim march planned in Switzerland following ones in Germany | i24news - See beyond

German anti-Islam rally hits record numbers - Al Jazeera English

Muslim stabbed to death in Dresden where thousands gathered for rallies | Daily Mail Online
 

Overstating? :lol: Stop kidding me... everyone knows about the communal tensions in India due to religion... just looks at the deaths, the property damage, etc etc etc...

If people who get butchered by mobs does not define the lack of safety THEN WHAT ON EARTH DOES?!


1.) +2.) People are just making use of their right to protest. They are not hunting Muslims nor is the real issue the influence of Islam but the dissatisfaction of many people with the political parties.

3.) One person who get killed is all you have to prove that ridiculous statement? Has your blind BJP fanboyism brought you really THAT LOW?! :lol:

Oh and besides, the man was killed by a fellow refugee over some personal matter..... Or does that also count for you?
 
Just one part of the story
Now try this...another muslim (Note how secular he is, I hope you can read the posts on his profile)

I am sure there are lots of Muslims who are doing well in India and hence like India, but my question is in reference to the thread title, that what about those who lost their loved ones in Gujarat Genocide (which was not some random act of violence/terrorism) but rather state sponsored? Do you think they would agree with the statement 'Muslims safer in India than anywhere else in the world?'

Answer:
1-Yes
2-No

What do you say, Levina?
 
I mean disservice to mankind by wasting your time in pdf. :P

i have reduced my time on pdf in the last two months. :-) though pdf provides me a platform to spread commie propaganda, especially among the ladies. :D

Haj Subsidy to be scrapped: In my opinion all religious subsidies for all communities should be scrapped, that's not the state's business.

agreement.

Bhagat Singh photos on currency notes:

disagree... bhagat singh was socialist... it would be insult to him for him to appear on money within a capitalist set up.

Make them sing Saraswati Vandana: It should be our national anthem.

as if i will sing. :D

Btw, Sanskrit is the mother language of all Indian languages, including the ones Muslims speak. It's not bad to learn some basics of it for 2-3 years in school. :)

sanskrit ( via hindi ) is just one of the components of urdu language... the others being arabi, farsi and turkic... and urdu is not the language of muslims only.
 
Overstating? :lol: Stop kidding me... everyone knows about the communal tensions in India due to religion... just looks at the deaths, the property damage, etc etc etc...

If people who get butchered by mobs does not define the lack of safety THEN WHAT ON EARTH DOES?!



1.) +2.) People are just making use of their right to protest. They are not hunting Muslims nor is the real issue the influence of Islam but the dissatisfaction of many people with the political parties.

3.) One person who get killed is all you have to prove that ridiculous statement? Has your blind BJP fanboyism brought you really THAT LOW?! :lol:

Oh and besides, the man was killed by a fellow refugee over some personal matter..... Or does that also count for you?

I am not a blind BJP fanboy :angry:
So who is hunting Muslims in India ? Hindus??
Right to protest is OK in Europe. Then why make a hue and cry over voluntary reconversions in India? Both are democratic.
 
what about those who lost their loved ones in Gujarat Genocide (which was not some random act of violence/terrorism) but rather state sponsored?
Why do you think that after the Gujarat riots no more "state sponsored" acts of violence (against muslims) 've occurred in India???
And how do you plan to prove that it was state sponsored?


Do you think they would agree with the statement 'Muslims safer in India than anywhere else in the world?'
Answer:
1-Yes
2-No
What do you say, Levina?
The fact that we 've a mini Pakistan within India or that India has the 2nd largest muslim population in the world proves it beyond doubt that muslims 're safe in India. The first two positions 're occupied by Islamic countries.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom