You Have Families Too, Cops Warn Terrorists In Kashmir In Retaliation

[M. Sarmad]

Yeah like you are ?? As per UNSC resolution 47 Pakistan is aggresor in Kashmir

A little correction. India tried its best but the UN did not declare Pakistan an aggressor state. India rejected the UNCIP proposals in 1948 on the basis of the argument that the proposal did not opportune any blame on Pakistan-which India considered as the aggressor in Kashmir.

 

[JOEY TRIBIANI]

Ya... we did see a sudden stop of the protest in the valley right after the demonetization...

We don't care... India doesn't need anyone's love.. the question is who is the real reason for their Struggle...??? You invaded the peacfull Kashmir in 48... its on your head, no matter how much u like to act as a savior... all the kashmiris blood is on you pakistan

Ohh if we are so evil . why dont lets just have a referendum in whole Kashmir?

lol no one is asking you for space that you are making judgement. You are not even party here.

Ok . but but but there are more Pakistani flags waving in iok then indian .

 

[Sheikh Rauf]

Comprehension problem! ???? He said most of them not all of them

What is ur army doing on border with fence drone snipers sniffer dogs.
It's all local or Indian cudnt handle few Mujahideen. It's no Pak policy. Control ur occupied Kashmir don't blame us.
Rondi buthiyan.

 

[NKVD]

A little correction. India tried its best but the UN did not declare Pakistan an aggressor state. India rejected the UNCIP proposals in 1948 on the basis of the argument that the proposal did not opportune any blame on Pakistan-which India considered as the aggressor in Kashmir.

Go read first clause of the UNSC resolution 47 that come and debate

I have the resolution saved stop it before you will bet embarrassed

 

[$@rJen]

Ohh if we are so evil . why dont lets just have a referendum in whole Kashmir?


Ok . but but but there are more Pakistani flags waving in iok then indian .

You need to learn the basics of referendum. First fullfill the UN requirements then only referendum can take place..
1.pakistan has to vocate ots forces since pakistan was the aggressor in 48.
2. If 1st step is full filled then india has to remove its forces and keep minimum no of forces to defend itself and held a peaceful referendum...
These are the 2 rules of 4 put up by UN after 48 war.... but Pakistan refused to pull its forces..... i bet they don't teach you the real hostory in pakistn

 

[M. Sarmad]

Go read first clause of the UNSC resolution 47 that come and debate

I have the resolution saved stop it before you will bet embarrassed

Please stop talking about things you don't know about/understand ...


For beginners like yourself:

The Security Council refrained from taking sides in the dispute. It did not condemn Pakistan as the aggressor, as India had requested.......

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_47

 

[Rajaraja Chola]

it is the slave police who targeted the families of the fighters. first and the fighters just warned the police that polic also have families so how it feels if they were targeted. and BTW it is not between police and fighters.it is between Indian Army and Kashmiris. the police dogs should stay away

Lol. Kashmir Police is the most experienced force apart from Punjab Police in dealing terrorism and there is a reason behind it. They have been ruthless. And most of the time even Police Encounters get reported as Army ones in Pakistani and even Indian media. So get your facts right.

Secondly Police force are mainly Kashmiris. No one can complain jack

The day India targets families of freedom fighter is they day Kashmir w/o be lost. Just do it

We have been losing Kashmir from 1948, according to Pakistanis, of course. Any more needless adventuranism will result in losage of another part of Pakistan. When Pakistan was not able to do in 60's, there is no way it can do in future when economy will be bright and so will be its defence, and so will be standard of Kashmiri living.

 

[M. Sarmad]

You need to learn the basics of referendum. First fullfill the UN requirements then only referendum can take place..
1.pakistan has to vocate ots forces since pakistan was the aggressor in 48.
2. If 1st step is full filled then india has to remove its forces and keep minimum no of forces to defend itself and held a peaceful referendum...
These are the 2 rules of 4 put up by UN after 48 war.... but Pakistan refused to pull its forces..... i bet they don't teach you the real hostory in pakistn

It's YOU who needs to learn the basics first, my friend

1) The UN did not declare Pakistan an aggressor state, and Pakistan was under no obligation to unilaterally withdraw its troops from Kashmir

2) Pakistan never refused to withdraw its troops. India refused to accept terms and conditions of withdrawal of troops (proposed by the UN) ... There is a reason that the UN appointed official mediator and International Press blamed India (and not Pakistan) for halting the referendum process

 

[Levina]

Kashmiri Freedom Fighters are not terrorists ... Their resistance/insurgency against the worst kind of oppression being carried out by alien occupying forces is indeed legitimate ....

The same forces weren't there till 1988.
Kashmir was a peaceful and prosperous state of India.
Dal lake was place visited by tourists from world over.

But what changed 40 years after independence?
Why did India have to send forces to Kashmir?
What's caused the exodus of Kashmiri pandits?


If these questions don't put you in introspection mode then nothing will.

Btw this is just a small part of Kashmir which is where such incidents happen.
Rest of Kashmir is still peaceful and ergo prosperous.

 

[Shamayl]

The same forces weren't there till 1988.
Kashmir was a peaceful and prosperous state of India.
Dal lake was place visited by tourists from world over.

But what changed 40 years after independence?
Why did India have to send forces to Kashmir?
What's caused the exodus of Kashmiri pandits?


If these questions don't put you in introspection mode then nothing will.

Btw this is just a small part of Kashmir which is where such incidents happen.
Rest of Kashmir is still peaceful and ergo prosperous.

Things changed after 84 elections where NC in collusion with Congress made mockery of election

 

[NKVD]

Please stop talking about things you don't know about/understand ...


For beginners like yourself:


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_47

Yeah i have to learn this from Pakistani

Dude pakistan versions on kashmir has no recognition amoung international bodies

This the what you posted without reading it

The resolution recommended that in order to ensure the impartiality of the plebiscite Pakistan withdraw all tribesmen and nationals who entered the region for the purpose of fighting and that India leave only the minimum number of troops needed to keep civil order. The Commission was also to send as many observers into the region as it deemed necessary to ensure the provisions of the resolution were enacted. Pakistan ignored the UN mandate, did not withdraw its troops and claimed the withdrawal of Indian forces was a prerequisite as per this resolution.[6]Subsequently Pakistan refused to implement the plebiscite until India accedes to it and continued holding on to the portion of Kashmir under its control


So its evident now what UN version is on kashmir

 

[JOEY TRIBIANI]

You need to learn the basics of referendum. First fullfill the UN requirements then only referendum can take place..
1.pakistan has to vocate ots forces since pakistan was the aggressor in 48.
2. If 1st step is full filled then india has to remove its forces and keep minimum no of forces to defend itself and held a peaceful referendum...
These are the 2 rules of 4 put up by UN after 48 war.... but Pakistan refused to pull its forces..... i bet they don't teach you the real hostory in pakistn

Un dont recognized Pakistan as an aggressor . both countries have to vocate at same time.

 

[Trango Towers]

Lol. Kashmir Police is the most experienced force apart from Punjab Police in dealing terrorism and there is a reason behind it. They have been ruthless. And most of the time even Police Encounters get reported as Army ones in Pakistani and even Indian media. So get your facts right.

Secondly Police force are mainly Kashmiris. No one can complain jack



We have been losing Kashmir from 1948, according to Pakistanis, of course. Any more needless adventuranism will result in losage of another part of Pakistan. When Pakistan was not able to do in 60's, there is no way it can do in future when economy will be bright and so will be its defence, and so will be standard of Kashmiri living.

Azad Kashmir was taken from you by force. Now get your facts straight. Do you still want to drink a cup of chai at Lahore Gymkhana. That was the 60's you are talking about right

 

[Arsalan mehmud]

All Policemen are locals, their families stay there

Hahahahaha all police.. you mean jammu?

 

[Rajaraja Chola]

Azad Kashmir was taken from you by force. Now get your facts straight. Do you still want to drink a cup of chai at Lahore Gymkhana. That was the 60's you are talking about right

It was not taken from us dumbo. First you guys should learn history
Tribals invaded the estwhile princely state of Kashmir. They defeated Maharaja forces and was just 20km away from SriNagar. The moment IA landed rest is history.

If Nehru hadnt gone to the UN by himself, we wont have Kashmir issue today.