SBD-3
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2008
- Messages
- 15,120
- Reaction score
- -9
- Country
- Location
Well the problem is that that Puppet was elected by yameni people, So if Hauties want a political role, why not come through elections? But looking at the history of Iranian proxies, Iran usually first creates a safe heaven area for her proxies to create a space. The GCC attempts to match the Iranian philosophy is gone bad and played right into the hands of Asad in Syria at least. But anyways, Shias call them Takfiris, they call Shias as Kafirs so both are extremists in their own point of view. Like I said, Pakistan has more interests with GCC than Tehran and Tehran has hardly tried to get involved with Islamabad. Rest, Tehran has probably taken the game so far. Now hardly finds anyone siding with her. Wrong policy of Mullah's had forced this move. Tehran should know that even the dirty games have some limits.There was no ISIS when GCC started sending and funding people to topple the Syrian government.
Sure, everything is driven by interests. So, at-least you should agree that by giving narrative "call of duty to protect holy land", Pakistani govt. again played the religious card. So, we are going on holy mission to protect holy land from whom? Kafar Shias or Shia Iran backed rebels? Haven't we learned any lesson from blunder after blunder yet? There is simply nothing holy in this war nor rag tag tribal are going to capture Makkah and Madina, So what's the need of fooling people and playing with their sentiments and put own house on fire. Why don't the government have courage to tell the truth that GCC want their puppet in Yemen, and Iran is backing people who are pro Iran and anti Saudi puppet? And also tell that it's probably revenge of Syria where Saudis tried to topple Iranian ally and in result ISIS was created, and what's happening in Iraq is also power struggle between Iran and Arabs?
1- Palistinians have themselves hurt their cause more than others. Their ambitions were more focused at cheating arabs than dealing with Israel.As you acknowledged that everything is driven by interests, so was the support of Arabs, and this support had nothing to do with deeper ties, brotherhood bullsh!t - whatever they did was for their own interests, they needed an underdog ready to offer his head for them and Pakistan fits the bill best. It's not that Pakistan haven't done anything in return, we have been supporting their interests for decades and sometime even on expense of our own interests but same thing can't be said about GCC, heck we even went to brutally kick the same Palestinian for whom now we shed crocodile tears and curse Israel. Why you are toeing line of Arabs of blackmail by holding 3 million Pakistani hostage? How many time India have said yes sir to Arabs? There are more Indians than Pakistanis in GCC, have they ever threatened to kick the Indians out just because their govt. didn't acted like pet dog and remained neutral or sometime even against them? Is our so called "deep strategic partnership" about which we kept fooling people is that much fragile that just not following exact orders once will seal the fate of 3 million Pakistanis? Isn't the Kafar west far better than so called brothers and strategic partners as at-least they don't threaten to take revenge of Pakistanis settled there, infect give citizenship, and treat them as human and equal citizen?
2- Well Indian dominance owes to a)Their greater population size b)Their accommodation behavior towards their countrymen. Its been jokingly said that once an Indian makes way into an organization, 5 years down the road the organization is filled with Indians. When a Pakistan joins an organization, 5 years down the road, the organization doesn't have any Pakistani except him.In addition, Indians have more focus on white collar jobs than Pakistanis who have been more interested in low-paid blue collar jobs.
3-The arabs don't give nationality to anyone, This is natural because there are more expats in ME states than the locals. So be it Indian, Filipino, Chinese, Westerner, they have the same policy for everyone.
4-I think Modi calling Salman was also noteworthy as India which has been more closer to Tehran has also side stepped quietly rather than lending any support to Tehran.
The UAE only came in as the WHO refused to fWest have provided lot more funds for vaccination than UAE, and over all Aid we took from western countries dwarf what GCC gave, so why not ask US to consider us 51st state, and start ruling us- they have lot more to offer to Pakistan or become under rule of PRC, she have deep pockets and can kick start massive development and industrial projects to accommodate 3 million Pakistanis which are held hostage? Or it's that Pakistani should continue to serve Arabs while you living quality life in Canada?